On the second anniversary of an unprecedented, violent assault on democratic self-government, America doesn’t have much time for commemoration or reflection, because the same anti-democratic, anti-government forces are usurping the House from within. It’s terrifying. #January6th
Let it serve as a reminder that the problem is not just Trump, not even primarily Trump: It’s the party that elevated him in the first place, the party that embraces and elevates far-right extremists like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.
The problem is the party that has been completely taken over by the far-right “populist” energies that conservative elites have been fueling for decades, always believing they could harness and control them in their quest to entrench traditional hierarchies, but never succeeding.
The problem is the party that is dominated by people who are not just skeptical of “big government,” but hostile to government itself - who reject functional governance and are entirely uninterested in any kind of constructive public policy.
The problem is the party that doesn’t care about majoritarian principles, democratic self-government, or the rule of law because it is comprised of people who consider white conservatives the sole proponents of “real America” and therefore entitled to rule.
The problem is the party whose anti-democratic radicalization has outpaced what even most critical observers imagined, the party serving as the political arm of an escalating reactionary counter-mobilization that would rather tear the whole system down than accept pluralism.
The problem is the party ruled by people who have long given themselves permission to cross any line, to embrace any extremists, in that defining struggle against what they constantly play up as a totalitarian threat from “the Left” to the essence of the nation.
The problem is the party full of people who absolutely will go *that far* - because they have convinced themselves and their radicalizing base that the other side has already gone *much further* and will stop at nothing.
In a healthy democratic system and political culture, anyone associated with the deranged extremism of people like Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene would be shunned and ostracized, and the party that elevates such forces would no longer be considered a viable option.
Instead, enabled by the many anti-democratic distortions in the constitution and the political system, the door has been left wide open for that party and the extremist forces that control it - they have been put in a position to undermine and subvert democracy on all levels.
On the second anniversary of an unprecedented, violent assault on democratic self-government, the same anti-democratic, anti-government forces managed to capture the House from within.

The insurrection ended in triumph.
There is a real danger that the January 6 attack will go down in history not as a failure, but as a catalyst for the GOP’s radicalization, a rallying cry for the Far Right, and a milestone on the path towards democracy’s downfall.

Last night brought us closer to that scenario.
All that talk about Trump being so weak? Last night was a good night for Trump. Or, at least: It was a good night for Trumpism. Which is really just party orthodoxy at this point. The forces that led to Trump’s rise rose with him and keep rising with or without him.
There is not going to be a return to “normalcy” now that the spectacle is over. At least not in the sense of moderation and a focus on constructive governance. Because this *is* the new normal in the Republican Party, it’s all there is: Pure White reactionary grievance politics.
One of the most “If they tell you who they really are, believe them” moments you’ll ever encounter.

What’s shocking (though not surprising) about this is the level of shamelessness: Exactly two years after #January6th, he’s basically saying: “Donald, look, we finally did it!”
McCarthy represents the Republican establishment. That doesn’t mean he’s a “moderate.” It means the GOP establishment is fully embracing the extremism as the party has moved so far to the right that yesterday’s radical fringe is now firmly in the center of conservative politics.
If you are looking for an extended discussion of what just happened in the House, here is our attempt to explain what the fault lines were and why the “moderates vs radicals” framework only obscures the full extent of the Republican embrace of extremism: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/9-c…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Jan 6
A reminder, as we are entering Day 4 of this mess: The new @USDemocracyPod is out, with a deep dive into the Republican chaos in the House - the background, the historical context, the implications for the GOP and the country going forward. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/9-c…
We must now go back to the 1830s to 1850s to find precedent for the number of failed votes. As I said on the pod, this doesn’t mean the situation is *just like* right before the Civil War, as there is no such thing as “just like” in history. But things certainly aren’t great.
We recorded in-between failed vote 3 and 4 - but I believe everything we say very much holds up: How to explain it, what the fault lines are, why it’s misleading to present the #McCarthy camp as “moderates” and only the rebels as “extremists.”
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6
Please read the piece and tell me: Who is arguing “You must never criticize, must always defer to progressive activists”? I am sure there are some people on the internet who say such things. But anyone of consequence? Anyone named in the piece? This is so disingenuous.
As a reminder, I am among a group of “left-wing commentators” who Chait attacks in the piece because our “ideology” is supposedly “organized around preventing thought.” You know, typical leftwing “cancel culture,” what else.
Where is the actual evidence for such maximalist claims of quasi-totalitarian “thought-prevention” and illiberal suppression of investigation and critical inquiry? Where is the empirical basis for such devastating accusations? Because it’s certainly not in the piece.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 5
Faces of Extremism.

Always remember: There is no law of nature that says democracy can’t be brought down by a bunch of clowns and grifters with enough support from people, parties, and institutions who enable them. It’s just a farce - until these goons and buffoons are in power.
I wrote this long piece back in April, about why, unfortunately, we can’t simply ignore these people – because their extremism is increasingly that of the Republican Party itself. And the Republican assault on democracy and government only keeps escalating.
There certainly is a calculating quality to such stunts – people like Gaetz and Greene clearly enjoy the attention. And if what’s on display here were just the extremist polemics of fringe figures, it would indeed be best to simply ignore them. But it’s actually much worse.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 5
🚨 New episode of @USDemocracyPod just dropped a day early: Chaos in the House!
 
Also: How can we explain the radicalization of formerly “moderate” Republicans? And finally: What we expect for democracy in 2023. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/9-c…
We are witnessing a historic spectacle in the House. Join us for a deep dive into the Republican inability to elect a speaker: How to explain it, what the fault lines are, why it’s misleading to present the #McCarthy camp as “moderates” and only the rebels as “extremists.”
Also: Whatever happened to “moderate” Republicans? We look at the case of Elise Stefanik and reflect on the lure of Trumpism, the relationship between opportunism and ideology, and the personal dynamics of a radicalization that is shifting the GOP ever further to the right.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 4
I am criticized in this piece - alongside other “left-wing commentators” - as someone “whose ideology is organized around preventing thought.” Because, obviously, everything has to be presented as part of leftwing cancel culture. What else could possibly be going on.
You should really listen to the discussion about (reactionary) centrism we had on @USDemocracyPod – Chait quotes it briefly, but, interestingly, doesn’t name the podcast and provides no link (a direct quote without a link: hm, that seems… not ok). Here it is:
By the way, the other thought-preventing “left-wing commentators” who are mentioned in this piece are @aaronhuertas, @RottenInDenmark, and @HeerJeet. Pretty decent company, if you ask me – especially compared to the crowd Chait claims we are so unfairly trying to silence.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 2
This “Democracy didn’t end on Nov. 8 - which proves there never was any threat to democracy to begin with” stuff is so asinine and dangerous. Hamid is one of the most consistently misleading/misled pundits in America. This is actively undermining the democratic defense. 1/
Remember John Roberts’ logic for gutting the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder, which Ruth Bader Ginsburg compared to “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet”? This is very much like that. 2/
Many people in blue and purple states were convinced that American democracy was acutely threatened, made its defense their overriding concern in the 2022 midterms – and it was *just* enough to fight off the assault on the political system and democratic self-government. 3/
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(