Post

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
Click again on or Share Via icon
Click on Copy Link to Tweet
Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
More info at Twitter Help

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

Jan 8, 2023 • 19 tweets • 8 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

It's Saturday night, so I know what you really want to do is read a magical (and I mean that) World Economic Forum article with me! They've discovered another "opportunity" and published it this week.
weforum.org/agenda/2023/01…

Some WEF Guru tells us "we cannot waste time be in disunity" about "climate change" and "sustainability." That is, this "global shaper" asshole wants us not to waste time thinking or debating; we need to just do what the WEF wants. No time to waste. It's a crisis; do something!

What we see here is that these assholes at the WEF are going to shape the discourses of the year toward "teamwork" on "climate action" and "sustainability." What this means is that we refuse every advance on those topics and demand substantive debate and NO action.

For those who don't yet realize, "sustainability" is the brand name for the tyranny of the 21st century. You'll be hearing a lot about this and the "Sustainable Development Goals" of the UN Agenda 2030 this year. It means technocratic tyranny.
newdiscourses.com/2021/10/sustai…

Much of the "sustainability" discourse will be framed in terms of your role as a "global citizen," which is a fabrication that will become your oppression if you accept it. Being a "global citizen" will require you to act sustainably and inclusively.
newdiscourses.com/tftw-global-ci…

The destabilization they've fear-mongered about regarding their proxy war is the backdrop these assholes set out for why they should get to seize more power. They think it will drive us toward "collective hope" for "holistic (Marxist) sustainable development." They're wrong.

Commercial break: LOL 🤡

Remember how "urgency" was "white supremacy culture" two years ago? Yeah, that was deflection by projection. They're going to force this, hard and fast, and that's good because it's going to redpill LOTS of people. No one trusts these goofy assholes anymore, and they know it.

We have to act even faster because of their proxy war. How convenient. And act faster for what? Achieving the United Nations Agenda 2030 "Sustainable Development Goals," which are "17 goals to transform (Marxism) our world." Does that follow? No. Not at all. It's pretext.

Some other asshole, singular, working for an outfit that's obviously a front ("resiliency center") said calamity awaits if we don't act according to his model (with graphic). Author asshole connects this to "non-cooperation" because they're Neo-Communists.

Ask yourself if this makes sense. (It doesn't.) Ecosystems are interconnected (maybe), so humans have to engage in "global cooperation" (Neo-Communism) to "avoid cataclysm." Efforts must only be toward their agenda.

These people are complete assholes. Actually, stupid assholes.

Same dumb shit again. None of the logic here squares up, just like in Marxism. Interconnectedness of "planetary thresholds" doesn't imply anything about a need for coordinated global action in the direction of their scam. Never forget that these people are just giant assholes.

Here, this giant weeping asshole isn't just trying to sound smart or like a Weinstein by invoking game theory. He's trying to trick you into thinking playing a negative-sum game is a positive-sum game (in which all ships rise). Redistribution and money pits never achieve that.

How does he pull a "positive-sum game" out of his ass, tho? See, the Sustainable Development Goals overlap, so working on some of them contributes to working on others at the same time. Nobody benefits. It's pure, unadulterated bullshit. He can't even say it WILL work; it MAY.

It's all about adopting an "international identity" ("global citizenship") that defines itself on their crooked terms like inclusivity and sustainability... unless you're China, amirite?

These assholes are just out to destroy the West. This is Neo-Communism.

What. An. Asshole.

"Environmental" Neo-Communism that requires "equalizing historical responsibilities towards climate action" (destroying the West, elevating China) with "unanimous global consensus towards sustainability" such that the "will of every individual" is bent to it.

"Global citizenship" is such a lie.
newdiscourses.com/2022/09/dialec…

When I'm right, I'm right. "Global citizenship" is going to be a huge push this year. It will be defined around achieving the United Nations Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and submitting your will to the WEF and its pro-China Neo-Communist global redistribution scam.

Live shot of me trashing this WEF asshole for you, photo credit to my lovely wife.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @ConceptualJames

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

May 8

Do you think this right-wing influencer is Woke Right?

This is a thread of new polls revisiting the same questions and same personalities from last August, so scroll down and RT the top post.

1) Tucker Carlson

2) Ben Shapiro

3) Candace Owens

Read 35 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Dec 7, 2025

From my Woke Encyclopedia, an explanation of the "friend-enemy distinction" of Carl Schmitt, which is the Woke political logic. Link at the end!🧵

(1/13) The friend-enemy distinction refers to the cornerstone object of the political and judicial philosophy of a German theorist named Carl Schmitt, who wrote a number of works of right-wing political philosophy and thought before becoming such an enthusiastic Nazi in 1933, just after Adolf Hitler took power, that he earned the informal title “the Crown Jurist of the Third Reich.”

Though most of his significant political thinking was done both before and after he was a Nazi, during the years when he was a part of Hitler’s National Socialist movement and Party, he contributed strongly to the legal theory that justified the Nazi “total state,” including writing the 1933 piece that gets rendered in English as “The Legal Basis for the Total State,” which is significantly based upon the friend-enemy distinction.

Friend-enemy distinction:

(2/13) Schmitt’s thought is primarily of interest on the Woke Right, where he is a favored thinker and model political mind. He is vigorously forwarded for a handful of his political concepts, perhaps most visibly his “friend-enemy distinction” as the essential criterion of what makes politics political. This idea is first presented and developed in full detail in his 1927/32 book The Concept of the Political.

Friend-enemy distinction:

(3/13) For Schmitt, what makes the politics political is the distinction between (public) friend and (public) enemy, where enemies are defined as those who are interested in destroying one’s way of life and friends are defined as those who are willing to band together in its defense.

Schmitt specifically compares the essential nature of this distinction in politics to the distinction between good and evil in morality, beautiful and ugly in aesthetics, and profitable versus non-profitable in economics.

That is, politics is only political to the degree that it recognizes the possibility of factions that exist in mutual enmity underwritten by the potentially existential threat of violence. Of course, that means that Schmitt believes the essential criterion of politics is war, which he reveals also in part by making his point by completing the identity contained in von Clausewitz’s famous remark that “war is politics by other means.”

Read 13 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Nov 7, 2025

All radical movements find themselves in a pinch: they can only really advance when people don't know their true intentions, but they can only really advance by going public with what they're doing. It's an intrinsic dilemma that only rare figures in rare circumstances can win.

Mamdani is a good example of a rare figure (extremely good at presenting himself disingenuously while looking real) in rare circumstances (terrible primary opponent, then running against a terrible combination of Cuomo/Sliwa, then still not winning by huge margins).

The primary reason NYC got Mamdani isn't something to do with the electorate, the climate, or anything else. Mamdani, with tons of weird money, ran a very strong campaign (rare figure) in very weird circumstances, most of which were candidate-specific, not conditional.

Read 9 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Sep 25, 2025

The United Nations is a lot weirder than you think. A short thread of podcasts about it.
newdiscourses.com/2024/04/occult…

Like, it's really weird.
newdiscourses.com/2024/06/the-gl…

It's also evil.
newdiscourses.com/2023/07/exposi…

Read 10 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Jul 3, 2025

Fun fact: If you had a time machine and could go back in time to this day in 2019 but couldn't take any physical evidence with you, you could not convince almost anyone to take the Woke Left threat seriously and would get mocked and yelled at for trying, even by friends.

Your left-leaning friends (if you have any) would make fun of you for not getting it. Your right-leaning friends would laugh at you for making a mountain out of a molehill. No one really understood there was a serious problem with the Woke Left until after summer 2020.

The reason I know this is because I was there and doing this full time already by that point in my life.

Read 5 tweets

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames

Jun 26, 2025

Introducing to you two of the "intellectual" Woke Right's favorite contemporary thinkers: Patrick Deneen (left) and R.R. Reno. Here, they demonstrate their inability to see what is plainly in front of them—a Marxist insurgency through Leftist elitist capture—because of their preference for theories of cultural rot and decay.

These kinds of theories about why we are where we are aren't just dangerous misdiagnosed; they're also self-flattering humblebrags, saying in effect, "things got bad because everyone went to shit except people like us who are better than that." Typical Woke virtue signaling except in "modest" conservative form.