Utah has a draft plan to address homelessness. Comments are due today, Jan. 8. We think that the plan misses a huge part of the issue. See the @sltrib story for more. 1/ sltrib.com/news/politics/…
@sltrib One of the main causes of homelessness is lack of money to pay rent. Yet this is not mentioned in the plan nor is it mentioned typically in public discussions. Some steps to increase income to prevent homelessness: 1. Increase affordable transportation. cyclingutah.com/columns/editor…
This would add more money to people's pockets and thus increase the ability for people to pay rent. Denver, California, and many other locations have had great success with ebike rebate programs. The @bicycollective is a key NGO in providing bikes to low income people.
@bicycollective Free fares on UTA and other transit systems helps too. The cost for Utah is about $25-35 million. or about $12 to $15 in taxes per person on the Wasatch Front.
2. Get rid of the tax on food. This is the most regressive tax we have in Utah that hurts low income people the most. Going without food is not an option so people must choose between food and rent. We proposed a plan years ago. #utpolarchive.sltrib.com/article.php?id…
3. Increase Utah's minimum wage to $15/hour, and especially increase minimum wage for tipped workers which is $2.13/hour. This seems like an obvious way to put more money in the pockets of those on the brink of homelessness. Yet, we have not political will to do so. #utpol
While the Utah draft plan has some good ideas, it completely misses the boat in that it doesn't address the lack of rent money issue. You can comment on the plan (due January 8). Comment link in next tweet. utah.gov/pmn/files/9235…
2100 S in Sugar House is a street reconstruction. It is thus a Complete Streets Ordinance mandate that @slcmoves@stretchtraffic add bike lanes to the street. Their survey was disingenous in that it gave 'Do Nothing' as an option. This muddles the issue. #saltlakecity 1/
@slcmoves@stretchtraffic Some residents that answered 'do nothing' (same as Leave as is) will be confused if bike lanes are added as required by SLC Code. Unfortunately, @slcmayor and @slcmoves have shown that they don't understand and won't follow their own law. See 100 S for example.
@slcmoves@stretchtraffic@slcmayor SLC continues to have this offensive language on their website: "A common misconception of the City’s Complete Streets Ordinance (and complete streets in general) is that it requires bike lanes to be included in every street the City builds or reconstructs."
Just one more gondola will fix it!
UDOT hasn’t learned the principle of induced demand. That is, the more capacity a transportation system has, the more people will use it. 🧵 1/
The gondola at best has the ability to absorb about 15% of trips, but that’s not going to reduce canyon crowds. It will have opposite effect and will deliver 15% more people to the resorts.
Is that what is needed? Lift lines will be 15% longer, the powder will be gone by 9:35 instead of 10. And the red snake will still be there to bite you. And resort owners will be 15% richer. And gondola builders will be $250 million richer.