Dr. Simon Goddek Profile picture
Jan 8, 2023 β€’ 40 tweets β€’ 90 min read β€’ Read on X
1/ 𝗧𝗛π—₯π—˜π—”π——: My name is Dr. Simon Goddek, I am a biotechnologist, and only recently @elonmusk reinstated my account after being permabanned for 1.5 years. In 2021, I took Twitter to court and curiously lost the lawsuit. #FollowTheSilenced

This is my story. Image
2/ While I was still cautious at the beginning of 2020 because of the pictures in Bergamo, I had wondered more and more why people were forced to wear masks and no "expert" was talking about vitamin D.
3/ In good faith with science, I wrote a scientific paper on vitamin D in mid-2020 to demonstrate (by illustrating metabolic pathways) that giving "high doses" could treat covid and other health-related problems. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32768697/
4/ It didn't take long for my former employer @wur to receive the first emails. They stated that I was a pseudoscientist and corona denier. My "unscientific publication" had to be retracted immediately, was the demand of these people, who were members of the "skeptical movement".
5/ I consequently became active on @twitter end of 2020. I had never been a social media person but I felt that I could no longer be silent, given the fact that I was working at a Dutch university and being an editor of a Q1 journal at that time. This is when it all started...
6/ Via @waukema, I learned that the German State Virologist and fearmonger, @c_drosten, got his publication on the Covid PCR test through peer review at record time. Without this specific PCR test, we would probably never have noticed this "coronavirus".
7/ I started to analyse what happened and came to the conclusion that the peer-review process was rigged as the chronology of the events shows. I consequently wrote my first Twitter thread that went viral.
8/ These are the questions I raised:
β–ΆοΈŽ How did Drosten's paper make it through the peer review process within 24h?
β–ΆοΈŽ How does he even publish there while being part of the journal's editorial board?
β–ΆοΈŽ Why does the journal refuse to publish anonymous peer-review reports?
9/ Overnight I gained thousands of followers and was heavily attacked by virologists from @UniUtrecht and @erasmusuni. They tried everything to get me to take my thread (see substack link) offline. This was my first contact with the cancel culture movement.drsimon.substack.com/publish/post/7…
10/ I did some more digging and also learned that @c_drosten…
β–ΆοΈŽ Created that specific PCR test most likely even before the outbreak of the pandemic
β–ΆοΈŽ Denied viral seasonality (t.me/goddek/1295)
β–ΆοΈŽ Made contradictory statements about masks (t.me/goddek/563)
11/ …and…
β–ΆοΈŽ Predicted piles of corpses on African streets (bit.ly/3ictjy4)
β–ΆοΈŽ Called renowned dissidents "pseudoscientists" (bit.ly/36ngzle)
β–ΆοΈŽ Got funds from the @gatesfoundation and had his professorship sponsored by Nazi-money (Quandt Family)
12/ Questions upon questions and still no answers. My account grew. I began to post more studies, for example, about the efficacy of masks, the implementation of arbitrary measures and their effects on public health, the potential of vitamin D, etc.
13/ The more I wrote, the more "fan mail" my then-employer @wur got. My research funding expired in March 2021, but I had written an EU-funding proposal in 2020 (in my spare time) to prolong my employment. The chance to win was 1% and guess what - I won. πŸ₯³
14/ Even though @wur backed me and I personally raised a large amount of funding for them, I was told by phone that I would be dismissed from my position because of my tweets. They would use the money I generated to hire someone less critical. Overnight, I was out of a job.
15/ Since life in πŸ‡³πŸ‡± was too expensive for an unemployed person, I decided to move to πŸ‡§πŸ‡· to live with my partner. There I bought a few hectares of land in the jungle to escape the madness. I had to leave my family and friends behind. It hurt, but I did not have much of a choice.
16/ These were difficult months for me. The feeling of being treated unfairly and cancelled was suffocating. I just couldn't sit on it. I decided to take Twitter to court. "Justice will prevail", I thought. A naive thought, as it would later turn out.
17/ My posts must have consistently been a thorn in the side of the woke fact-checkers from Twitter's Ministry of Truth, and I've regularly been temporarily banned from Twitter for statements that are mainstream these days. Here are a few examples. #cringealert
18/ π—˜π—«π—”π— π—£π—Ÿπ—˜ π—’π—‘π—˜: I referred to this publication (mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8…), which has been peer-reviewed. Twitter banned me for doing so for one week for "Violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.".
19/ π—˜π—«π—”π— π—£π—Ÿπ—˜ 𝗧π—ͺ𝗒: I cited (!!!) a scientist from an official Texas Senate hearing and posted the corresponding video. See:
20/ π—˜π—«π—”π— π—£π—Ÿπ—˜ 𝗧𝗛π—₯π—˜π—˜: Here, I referred to meta-analyses that are available on vdmeta.com and c19ivm.org. Fun fact: the scientists that are running these websites have been banned from @twitter, too.
21/ π—˜π—«π—”π— π—£π—Ÿπ—˜ 𝗙𝗒𝗨π—₯: In June 2021, I was banned for asking questions. The @gatesfoundation really invested that much into BioNTech (endpts.com/biontech-partn…). Why was it prohibited to ask questions?
22/ One day later, my account got permabanned. My impact was probably too big (400 new followers per day and 3K likes on average) that Twitter pulled the ripcord. My account was banned for "targeted harassment" without Twitter providing me with a specific explanation.
23/ Even after requesting further information about permanently locking my account, Twitter refused to give me the actual or specific reason for the suspension. Since I had moved to Brazil in the meantime, I took Twitter to court here.
24/ I contracted one of the best lawyers for media law in Brazil, who informed me in beforehand that Twitter is the worst social medium and that they usually do not care about free speech. He told me that there is a high likelihood that they’d have to reinstate my account.
25/ However, due to the "pandemic," the hearing could not take place in person. Instead, we had a Zoom Call. Present were the judge, my lawyer, me and six (!!!) lawyers for Twitter.
26/ The Brazilian armada of Twitter lawyers explained during the trial that I was not banned for "targeted harassment" but for spreading dangerous medical falsehoods (i.e. Twitter initially lied). Nevertheless, I was also presented with the tweet that led to my final suspension.
27/ The second hearing was in writing only. The judge's decision was then made in March 2022. It was argued that it did not matter whether my statements were correct or not. According to the judge, Twitter has digital domiciliary rights in Brazil.
28/ The Twitter chapter was therefore closed for me. My permaban was politically motivated and there was nothing I could do about it. So I put my energy into my Telegram channel (t.me/goddek) and my new permacultural life in the Brazilian wilderness.
29/ In the meantime I have found a new job and my Twitter account has been reinstated thanks to @elonmusk. What remains is that we have been insulted, cancelled, ridiculed, and publicly discredited for speaking out against irrational measures.
@elonmusk 30/ My story is one of millions. Many of you have surely suffered a similar, if not worse, fate. That is precisely why we must stick together and support each other. My PMs are open and on @telegram I read every single one of your comments. It's wonderful that you all exist!
@elonmusk @telegram 31/ We who have been cancelled must finally be heard again. Hence #FollowTheSilenced instead of #FollowTheScience. My story was just one of many. Many like-minded people share a similar fate with me. Some of them are...

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Dr. Simon Goddek

Dr. Simon Goddek Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @goddeketal

Mar 29
🧡THREAD: Let's start the day with something positive: it's not the mRNA vaccines that cause increasing cancer and heart attack rates.

Thanks to our dedicated investigative mainstream media journalists, the reasons for them have finally been revealed.

Here are my TOP 20. πŸΏβ¬‡οΈImage
#1 DRUGS – The German newspaper @bzberlin is onto something very hot. The reason for the more than doubled heart problems among young Berliners is drug use, even though it has been continuously declining since the year 2000.Image
#2 GARDENING – The British BBC journalist and former health reporter for @TheSun, @terria_williams, reported that gardening increases the risk of a 'killer heart disease'. With this trash article, she probably recommended herself for the BBC.Image
Read 22 tweets
Mar 23
🧡 THREAD: Meet @CaulfieldTim, a Canadian law professor, who continues to defend Big Pharma by claiming that Covid vaccines cannot cause cancer, labeling those who suggest otherwise as members of a "Death Cult."

However, @EthicalSkeptic demonstrates through his analyses that Caulfield's claims are incorrect. So, why does this man mislead in such an aggressive manner? FOLLOW THE MONEY, GUYS!

The evidence in the next tweet explains why he does so. In April 2020, Caulfield received $380,000 to fight Covid misinformation, and a year later, a whopping $1,750,000.

This professor isn't interested in the facts - he's a hired gun who would say anything for a price. ⬇️⬇️⬇️Image
#2 During Covid, Caulfield notably defamed anyone questioning Big Pharma. But should a "science communicator" act this way? Isn't the essence of science to challenge our own hypotheses and explore all possible options?

What Timothy Caulfield did was equate those distrusting Big Pharma with Holocaust deniers instead. This association was made both directly and indirectly, as he frequently used the term "denier" in numerous postsβ€”a term often linked with Holocaust denial. He also never questioned the 'vaccines' and public measures such as 'masks' and 'lockdowns'.

Under the hashtag #ScienceUpFirst, he cherry-picked data and discredited those with differing viewsβ€”all in the name of science. Timothy Caulfield has acted as a digital witch-hunter for the past four years, which I'll prove in subsequent tweets. I would strongly advise @UAlberta to consider initiating disciplinary proceedings against this "anti-science aggressor" (to borrow Caulfield's own phrasing). Otherwise, the institution may soon face scrutiny for its continued association with someone who appears to be an overtly unscientific propagandist.Image
#3 Half a year ago, on August 22nd, @CaulfieldTim made a post. He claimed that Ivermectin is ineffective, despite a meta-analysis of 99 studies indicating an 85% improvement in prophylaxis with Ivermectin. He also claimed that vaccines don't cause autism, even though there are numerous indications to the contrary, and no definitive statement can be made.

He also suggests that Covid 'vaccines' don't result in infertility. However, a video from Project Veritas captures a former Pfizer employee suggesting otherwise. Furthermore, data indicates a significant drop in fertility rates in many countries, with numerous women reporting missed periods post-vaccination. Such assertions from him appear highly unscientific and intentionally misleading.Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 30
🚨EXPOSED – Over the past four years, Prof. @devisridhar, an asset of the WEF and @gatesfoundation, has been strongly discriminating against the unvaccinated and spreading lies. Now, she's attempting to absolve herself of any blame, but that is not going to happen.

A THREADπŸ§΅β¬‡οΈ Image
#1 Devi Sridhar is a professor & chair of Global Public Health at the University of Edinburgh and has been one of the biggest WEF-shills. She has stated that "global events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change are making us all sicker", but rejects to blame the vaxx. Image
#2 Instead, she is now blaming the politicians for the policies she once demanded. The fact that she can do this in a newspaper funded by the @gatesfoundation says it all. That woman is connected to the WEF, GAVI, the Clintons, and Gates - and I have proof of it. Image
Read 15 tweets
Jan 28
🧡THREAD: Remember when they cancelled millions of cancer screening appointments, leading to a significant increase in avoidable cancer deaths, while they performed ridiculous dance routines instead?

Let me show you 25 more pieces of evidence proving that Covid was a big hoax.⬇️
#1 Remember when being symptomless was considered one of the symptoms? The lie that one could be asymptotically ill, along with fraudulent PCR tests, only made this plandemic possible. Either you are sick, or you aren't; being healthy was not a symptom of illness until 2020. Image
#2 Remember when the CCP πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ released CCTV recordings showing people collapsing on the street like sacks of rice, catching themselves with their hands just before impact, and then shaking spasmodically? They said it was one of the Covid symptoms and nobody ever questioned it.
Read 26 tweets
Jan 27
🧡THREAD: Today, I am going to red-pill you about vegetable oils because they are toxic and will make you sick. Consequently, this is likely the most important thread you will read this week. Contrary to popular belief, the term 'vegetable oils' is somewhat misleading. These oils are named 'vegetable' not because they come from vegetables in the traditional sense, but because they are derived from plant sources. This includes seeds such as cottonseeds, soybeans, and sunflowers seeds.

These oils need to be refined to remove various toxins and natural impurities which can be harmful or affect the taste and stability of the oil. The refining process also helps in extending the shelf life of these oils.

However, this refining process leads to the formation of trans fats. These are a type of unsaturated fat that can be detrimental to our health, particularly when consumed in high amounts.

Trans fats, along with a high omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratio found in these oils, disrupt our body's metabolic processes. They contribute to inflammation and an imbalance in cytokine production, which are crucial in our body's immune response and healing processes.

Long-term consumption of these fats is linked to various health hazards, including increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and other chronic conditions.

To provide a comparison, I've included olive oil in the graphic. Unlike these refined oils, olive oil, especially extra virgin olive oil, is less processed and contains healthy fats. It has a more balanced omega-6 to omega-3 ratio and doesn't contain trans fats, making it a much better choice for your health.

In the posts below, I will tell you about the history of vegetable oils and explain the mechanisms that make these seed oils extremely harmful.Image
#2 Did you know that vegetable oils such as soybean, sunflower, and corn oil are commonly utilized in cooking and processed foods? These oils are high in omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). While omega-6 fats are necessary for our health, having too much of them, especially from processed vegetable oils, is problematic, to say the least.

When vegetable oils are processed and heated, such as during cooking or manufacturing, it can start a process called lipid peroxidation. This is where the fats in the oils react with oxygen. It's a bit like how iron rusts when it's exposed to air and moisture. In the case of these oils, lipid peroxidation leads to the creation of several byproducts, and one of them is this tricky compound called 4-HNE.

4-HNE is a problem because it's very reactive. It can easily interact with different parts of our cells, like proteins, DNA, and other fats. This can damage these cell parts, causing them to malfunction. Over time, this damage will most likely contribute to various diseases, such as heart disease, certain types of cancer, diabetes, and even brain-related diseases like Alzheimer's.

So, the connection here is that the processing of vegetable oils can lead to increased lipid peroxidation, resulting in higher levels of harmful compounds like 4-HNE in our body. That's why you should avoid vegetable oils at all cost. In the attached video clip, @TuckerGoodrich explains why the consumption of vegetable oils can lead to weight gain and negatively impact your health.
#3 The prevalence of vegetable oils in processed foods is staggering due to their cost-effectiveness. But how often do you take a moment to read the small print on the back of a product? Here's a simple rule: whenever you spot "vegetable oil" in the ingredients, RUN FOR YOUR LIFE.

πŸ’‘ Now, let's delve into the history of why vegetable oils became so prevalent a century ago. Back in 1900, an entirely different story was unfolding across the ocean. The German army was actively seeking a synthetic lubricant for diesel engines used in submarines. In 1902, the German chemist Wilhelm Normann achieved a groundbreaking milestone by successfully solidifying vegetable oils. At the same time, the United States was grappling with a surplus of cotton production, leading to a dilemma on how to utilize the waste streams, especially the seeds. Instead of discarding them, someone had the idea to extract oil from these seeds. However, there was a significant hurdle to overcome – the presence of a toxin called gossypol within the cotton seeds.

πŸ”₯ To rid the oil of toxins like gossypol found in cotton seeds, a similar refining process was employed, involving high heat, chemicals, and immense pressure. Yet, this process had its own set of problems. Exposure to high heat during refining made the oil prone to oxidation, leading to the accumulation of free radicals, which harm cells and contribute to illness and aging, as explained in a previous post.

πŸ•°οΈ Around 1920, this product was transformed into something you might recognize today as 'Crisco,' an abbreviation for Crystalized Cottonseed Oil. But eventually, soybean oil emerged as a cheaper alternative. Remember, in the world of business, profits often take precedence over people's health.

Watch the whole video about β€˜The $100 Billion Dollar Ingredient making your Food Toxic’ here:
Read 5 tweets
Dec 31, 2023
🧡There are accounts that seem to pop up everywhere, but did you know that many are silenced and shadowbanned by the algorithm?

Here are ten accounts they didn't want you to follow in 2023 but are essential to follow in 2024.⬇️⬇️⬇️ Image
#1 Neil Oliver (@thecoastguy) is a 'truth-teller' who is skeptical in all directions. I hardly ever see his tweets pop up and have to visit his profile regularly. This Scotsman is a must-follow for 2024 if you don't already do so. Image
#2 Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt) is a Canadian scientist who, despite all the pressure, has not allowed himself to be silenced. His analyses of excess mortality due to vaccines are remarkable. For this reason, he is probably also shadowbanned. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(