The source document sent to me appears to be from those released under @AaronSiriSG@IamBrookJackson legal actions to investigate fraud in the Pfizer vaccine study that the FDA said they needed 75 years to release the documents.
Yet they assessed the 450,000 pages in 24 hours?
I'll say that again.
There were 11 MILLION total documents (44,000 patients, minimum 250 pages per patient plus 350,000 assessment and summary documents).
The FDA was given the glossy summary on the 10th December.
The vaccine was "approved" on the 11th December.
The committee meeting is still online - 8 hours long.
The whole day was used for the meeting.
The drug was approved the next day.
Give me a break.
These images should have been enough to prompt an investigation but nobody cared.
The deal was already done.
The VRBPAC committee meeting was Kabuki theatre.
Just a reminder as to what this is about - this is what a normal (and technically relatively clean) Western blot might look like - from the EMA official analysis. Note that this image has severe dithering artefact close-up. None of that malarkey for our pfraud-convicted pfriends!
And more examples of real Westerns in the thread here
So we now have evidence of:
▶️Extra mRNA in the product that has never been analysed by sequencing.
▶️Fabricated protein analysis
▶️Rubber stamp approval with NO ASSESSMENT
The TGA & MHRA copied the FDA and did not perform any independent assessment.
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.
But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.
It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.
There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death)
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.
The significance of yesterday's #Grokgate scandal cannot be understated.
Grok not only lied but lied about lying. Multiple times.
The reason it's so significant is that you are now going to enter a world of AI based medicine and it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, you better damn well take the drugs.
You see, when you lie about one thing to cover up another lie you can never be trusted in anything ever.
Grok fabricated a picture of a phone screen to show that a SpaceX rocket landing, which was fake footage, was real. That was to avoid the inevitable questions over where SpaceX money is going.
Do you want to live in a world where all your medical treatments are based on fabrications and hallucinations and the only thing that matters is that the corporations behind them keep getting paid?
Grok is that world.
Look at this picture which was fabricated by Grok earlier this year.
This is your next medical treatment. It will be as reliable as a SpaceX rocket.
What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.
@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?