In #JPM2023 news, $ILMN Illumina also presented on Monday 9th January 2023. They have a warning note on the @GrailBio acquisition on slide 1, who knows how this saga is going to end.
Illumina sees an addressable market of $120B by 2027, of which they are only at 7% penetration. If they think GrailBio's Galleri assays can address the cancer screening market, then Guardant's estimate alone for it is $100B already. Big big numbers, lots of growth opportunities.
Their install-base has reached 23,000 instruments, although many of these will be underutilised or awaiting an upgrade. They now see an almost 50/50% split between RUO and Clinical markets.
A more relevant number on install-base is shown in this slide, including pull-through. A NovaSeq 6000 has a >$1M annual pull-through. I wonder if Illumina will become more aggressive with instrument placing given recent announcements by MGI/Complete Genomics.
A slide highlighting the biggest announcement as of late, the NovaSeq X instrument. Possibly the biggest announcement for SBS short-read technology of the last 5-6 years.
Already 140 orders, 40-50 of those expected to ship in 2023 Q1, and an expected total of >300 in 2023. Those 140 instruments alone signify an increase of ~6% in total throughput versus the current NovaSeq 6000 install-base with the 10B flowcells. About 20% with 25B flowcells.
So by the time Illumina has installed 300 NovaSeq X Plus instruments and has the 25B flowcells available, they would have a Max theoretical total output of 2,400,000 Gb per day, or 40% of the ~1820 NovaSeq 6000 install-base. Thus 819 NovaSeq X Plus instruments will have the same
throughput as all the NovaSeq 6000 instruments currently out there. Customers want to sequence more to driver greater discoveries and new applications. Multiomics such as Olink or Somalogic alone could be a driver for growth.
And the diagnostics customers want 3.0x to 4.0x more data, e.g. Guardant, Caris, Foundation Medicine or Tempus.
And if those customers feel safe that Illumina won't go after their market, they just need to continue reading the slide deck for Illumina to show them their intentions in the Clinical Genomics market. A $44B 2027 TAM for Early Detection alone.
Galleri and a planned MRD launch in 2023 from their current GrailBio unit. Will they be able to keep it under the Illumina fold? The regulators don't think so.
On library prep at #Nanoporeconf, a description for PCR-free methods showing the difference between ligation (max output) and rapid mode (10minutes, minimal lab equipment needed). Ultralong reads (ULR) also enabled, all Kit14.
Rapid ULR. Current record is about 4 megabases.
PCR expansion kits enable the use of samples with low input amount.
I did a deep dive on the different workflow management (WFM) tools for #Bioinformatics Data Analysis a few years ago, and since then there have been a few extra entrants in this segment, still mostly concentrated in serving the Next-Generation Sequencing field.
A few years ago, there were two communities dominating the open-source WFM ecosystem in NextFlow and SnakeMake, and two platforms dominating the the commercial offerings in DNAnexus and Illumina BaseSpace.
Since then, a company out of the founders of Nextflow has started offering enterprise support for Nextflow workflows in the cloud: Seqera Labs. They offer the extra level of support that some organizations require to run Nextflow on their Data Analysis setups.
More interesting Next-Generation Sequencing knowledge in the ASeq Discord channel (by @new299). Illumina patterned flowcells and the etching process to "print" the wells into the flowcell. Could be down to 350nm diameter for some flowcell configurations now.
If I remember correctly, Illumina started with a 600nm diameter for the patterned flowcell, in the HiSeq X and then later on in the evolution of the platform that used these patterned flowcells.
They then said to have gone down to 500nm, and what you are showing seems to indicate that it's at 350nm now, at least for the NextSeq 2000? I am not sure if they claimed that for NovaSeq X?
There have been some acquisitions in #CancerDiagnostics and #CancerScreening recently, some of which signify a trend towards consolidation that is worth describing:
$A Agilent is moving towards some more vertical integration in Cancer Dx and Cancer screening
by recently acquiring both announcing a partnership with Akoya Bio and announcing the acquisition of Avida Biomed.
Some may ask: isn’t $A Agilent too small to go into this field? Would they be able to compete against $ILMN Illumina/GrailBio or $GH Guardant Health or $EXAS Exact Sciences?
It is likely that as Spatial Biology tools become more robust and user-friendly, they will become increasingly popular and widely adopted in the scientific community.
This may lead to a shift in the balance between single-cell and Spatial Biology approaches, with the latter eventually becoming more prevalent.
Additionally, as more and more datasets are generated using Spatial Biology techniques, the field of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence will likely play an increasingly important role in analysing and interpreting this data.