In #JPM2023 news, $ILMN Illumina also presented on Monday 9th January 2023. They have a warning note on the @GrailBio acquisition on slide 1, who knows how this saga is going to end.
Illumina sees an addressable market of $120B by 2027, of which they are only at 7% penetration. If they think GrailBio's Galleri assays can address the cancer screening market, then Guardant's estimate alone for it is $100B already. Big big numbers, lots of growth opportunities.
Their install-base has reached 23,000 instruments, although many of these will be underutilised or awaiting an upgrade. They now see an almost 50/50% split between RUO and Clinical markets.
A more relevant number on install-base is shown in this slide, including pull-through. A NovaSeq 6000 has a >$1M annual pull-through. I wonder if Illumina will become more aggressive with instrument placing given recent announcements by MGI/Complete Genomics.
A slide highlighting the biggest announcement as of late, the NovaSeq X instrument. Possibly the biggest announcement for SBS short-read technology of the last 5-6 years.
Already 140 orders, 40-50 of those expected to ship in 2023 Q1, and an expected total of >300 in 2023. Those 140 instruments alone signify an increase of ~6% in total throughput versus the current NovaSeq 6000 install-base with the 10B flowcells. About 20% with 25B flowcells.
So by the time Illumina has installed 300 NovaSeq X Plus instruments and has the 25B flowcells available, they would have a Max theoretical total output of 2,400,000 Gb per day, or 40% of the ~1820 NovaSeq 6000 install-base. Thus 819 NovaSeq X Plus instruments will have the same
throughput as all the NovaSeq 6000 instruments currently out there. Customers want to sequence more to driver greater discoveries and new applications. Multiomics such as Olink or Somalogic alone could be a driver for growth.
And the diagnostics customers want 3.0x to 4.0x more data, e.g. Guardant, Caris, Foundation Medicine or Tempus.
And if those customers feel safe that Illumina won't go after their market, they just need to continue reading the slide deck for Illumina to show them their intentions in the Clinical Genomics market. A $44B 2027 TAM for Early Detection alone.
Galleri and a planned MRD launch in 2023 from their current GrailBio unit. Will they be able to keep it under the Illumina fold? The regulators don't think so.
In #JPM2023 news, $GH Guardant Health also presented on Monday, and here are some highlights of their presentation, which is available on their website. They value the cancer screening market at $100B, which is the first time I see the estimate breaking the three-digit-B mark.
One of their slides is entirely focussed on convincing the remaining doubters that power of epigenomics can be unlocked with Liquid Biopsy assays. I saw more people mentioning this in their social media as of late, but it's great to see such detail in $GH Guardant Health slides.
In this slide they show how the technology that Guardant calls 'Smart Liquid Biopsy' will also be applied to MRD apart from their screening assays.
Some initial results from the #CASP15 competition and we see that #Alphafold2 has become a fertile ground for experimentation by several research groups around the world. Facebook's ESM protein language models (pLMs) are the top non-MSA based methods.
Another slide showing some of the experimentation taking place: increase the number of models, recycles, get more diversity using dropout (how would that work?), subsample MSAs.
A slide showing the amount of #GPU hours used for computing the structures in the #CASP15 dataset.
In #NextGenerationSequencing news, we look at the clinical uptake of different NGS technologies after the recent updates announced in the last few months:
NGS has been dominated by Illumina with their SBS short-reads technology, with reads of up to 2x150 base pairs available in most configurations, although 2x300 are also possible at a higher cost per Gb.
If we could roll back time in the last 15-20 years of NGS history, we would ideally have had a long-reads technology, or better yet, a length agnostic technology, be the dominant player, as most applications, both in Life Sciences Research and Clinical, would have benefited
In Next-Generation sequencing news, we have been digesting the Chemistry X and $200/genome announcement by $ILMN Illumina for a few weeks now, and next in line are $PACB PacBio, MGI Tech and $ONT.L Oxford @nanopore to give updates between now and the year end.
The $200/genome announcement by Illumina puts pressure on the other short-read high CAPEX instrument companies, which at the moment would be MGI Tech and Ultima Genomics. Both will have to deliver on their promises of a $100/genome, which they both have made recently.
In terms of the long-read market, the $200/genome is a still a short-read play, and thus should not put pressure on PacBio and Oxford Nanopore in that regard. Illumina had to concede that long reads are important, and their Infinity technology strategy is a demonstration of the
Some back of the envelope calculations on the recent announcements by $ILMN Illumina make me think there may have been two lines of pricing being considered when launching the NovaSeq X Plus instrument line. The "conservative pricing" could have placed the 25B flowcell at $3/Gb.
Then placing the 10B flowcell somewhere in between the $3/Gb and the $6/Gb on the NovaSeq 6000 instrument, maybe at $4.5/Gb.
This would probably have matched MGI Tech's unofficial pricing of $6/Gb on the mid-throughput sequencer, where Element Bio @ElemBio is also priced.
And their DNBSEQ T7 equivalent to the NovaSeq 6000 at $4.5/Gb, maybe better? Their DNBSEQ T10x4 could already be at $1/Gb, but it's a larger installation and commitment than the NovaSeq X Plus 25B flowcell (H2 2023), and pricing isn't clear on it yet.