America began its rise as a great power in the 1880s

India's ascent to great power status will play out in the 2020s

3 revolutions allowed ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ to transform into a global pwr

Are those revolutions playing out in ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ?

๐Ÿงตon parallel trends & the one thing holding ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ back ๐Ÿ‘‡(1/21)
(2/21)
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's rise took place after the 1880s, also known as the "Gilded Age"

The Gilded Age was characterised by
- an exploding domestic economy
- social problems like inequality
- growing military pwr
- weak presidents
- rising expectations & disappointing performance
(3/21)
Prior to this, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's focus had been almost totally domestic

@DrMichaelJGreen argues 3 revolutions changed everything:

- Economic Revolution
- Government & Military Revolution
- Ideological Revolution

Each of these transformed ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ & set it on the path to great power status
(4/21)

Revolution 1: Economics

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's economy grew at breakneck speed during the Gilded Age

New infrastructure like railroads allowed heavy industry to take off

- Real wage growth of 60%
- Millions pulled out of poverty
- Massive innovation (Edison, Westinghouse etc)
(5/21)

Despite massive econ inequality, poverty & abuses of labour rights, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's econ growth was real & Americans grew richer

By start of 20th century, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ led world in industrial production

This meant ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ had a crucial tool it had lacked before: nat'l wealth
(6/21)
Revolution 2: Government & Military

In 1881, Chile threatened to sink ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's Pacific naval squadron

Chile may have succeeded since the US Navy was in terrible shape w. little investment

20 yrs later, Teddy Roosevelt could send the Great White Fleet to project ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ pwr

Why?
(7/21)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ began to acquire state & military power by

- Reforming the corrupt civil service
- Changes to the tax code that allowed increased revenues
- Using natl. wealth to transform ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's wooden navy into a modern battle fleet
- Established institutions Naval War College
(8/21)

Revolution 3: Ideology

Ideology transformed ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's national wealth and govt reforms into great power status

Thinkers like Frederick Jackson Turner & Brooks Adams transformed ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's inward looking natl ideology
(9/21)
Post 1860s civil war, ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's focus was on healing the ctry

By the Gilded Age, that goal was achieved & econ growth increased

However, social unrest & repeated econ recession caused tensions domestically

Turner, Adams & others believed only foreign expansion could save ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
(10/21)

They convinced Americans that

- ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ had to secure new overseas markets
- ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ had a moral duty abroad due to racial & religious superiority
- ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ people were "the most capable of bringing civilization, commerce, and peaceful interdependence to the world."
(11/21)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ideology allowed politicians like Cleveland & Roosevelt to:

-Begin transformation from ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's inward to global vision
-Gain public support for funding expensive programs like modernization of US Navy
-Rally citizens behind wars against foreign pwrs (Spain)
(12/21)

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's post-1991 story has interesting parallels to ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's Gilded Age

Similarity 1: The social setting

-Weak national governments (until 2014, no single party won a majority)
-Rapid economic growth w. inequality
-Increased military power (2022 defence budget is 10x 1991)
(13/21)

-Widespread corruption & disappointing governance performance
-Power in hands of massive business houses (๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ had Standard Oil, ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ has Reliance & Adani)

For more on how we're living in a Gilded Age with ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ characteristics, check out @jamescrabtree's "Billionaire Raj" ๐Ÿ‘‡
(14/21)
Similarity 2: Economic Revolution

Like ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ has seen impressive econ. growth since '91:
- Nominal GDP 2022 ๐Ÿ“ˆ 12 times
- Per capita income๐Ÿ“ˆ6 fold
- Major poverty relief

Like 1880s ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, massive poverty & inequality remain

However, this wealth has allowed๐Ÿ“ˆin natl. pwr
(15/21)
Similarity 3: Govt. & Military Revolution

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ has made reforms to๐Ÿ“ˆinstitutional pwr:

- Econ. reforms like GST๐Ÿ“ˆstate ability to collect revenue & fund natl. development

- Military reforms like Chief of Defence Staff (institutional) & major inductions (aircraft carrier)
(16/21)

But there's a key difference: Ideology

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's ideology in 1880s
-๐Ÿ“ˆglobal US presence was solution to domestic crises
- foreign markets will absorb ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's econ. potential
- ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ has moral duty to "uplift" & "christianize" the world

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ doesn't have a comparable ideology
(17/21)

Disclaimer: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ideology was heavily tinged with cultural, racial & moral superiority towards other groups

Not suggesting for a moment that ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ should emulate this

My limited point is that ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's ideology resonated w. people & made moral & practical case for ๐Ÿ“ˆ global role
(18/21)

Closest thing ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ has to an outward facing nat'l ideology: idea of ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ as "Vishwaguru"

What this is
-Promotes ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's econ strength & vibrant democracy as example to world

But Vishwaguru has key weaknesses as a national ideology that promotes ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's rise as a great power
(19/21)

Vishwaguru's current weakness

- Doesn't make popular moral case for incrsd. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ global role (๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ wanted to spread democracy)
- Doesn't make strong practical case for ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's role (๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sought external markets)
- Little mass appeal as foreign affairs is seen as elite playground
(19/21)

-Isn't used to mobilise citizens for great causes

Result:
-Despite๐Ÿ“ˆdemands, ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's diplomatic budget is small
-Organisations like ICCR promoting ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ values underfunded
-Public largely focused on internal challenges w/o a sense of what ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ is trying to achieve in world
(20/21)

What needs to change:

- Make practical case to Indians for incr. global role (๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ needs foreign markets, must stop ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ)
- Make a coherent moral case (world needs ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ sober diplomatic style, democratic values)
- Bring foreign affairs to the people (๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ using G20 for this)
(21/21)

Essentially, Vishwaguru or any ideology needs more details, articulate practical and moral concerns better & expand beyond a slogan used by politicians to become a concept that all of ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ identifies with

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ can then fuse wealth, military pwr & ideology to cement rise
Disclaimer:

I'm not trying to make exact comparisons since we're talking about vastly different ctries rising in entirely different int'l environments.

That said, the goal is to point to broad trends & curious similarities between the rise of ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ & ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Shashank Mattoo ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

Shashank Mattoo ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MattooShashank

Jan 4
India has learned how to outplay China's diplomats

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ and ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ compete over:

-Disputed boundary and Line of Actual Control
-Influence in S. Asia
-Terrorism & ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ
-Indo-Pacific

3 diplomatic duels over 25 yrs show how ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ can outplay ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‘‡(1/18)

(From @VGokhale59's "The Long Game")
(2/18)

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ has some key negotiating tactics

1. Win negotiations before they begin (do your homework)

2. Use silence (buy time & delay)

3. Let someone else do the fighting (hide behind others & avoid unpopular stands)

4. Use "no" (frustrate opponents into compromise)
(3/18)

5. It ain't over till it's over (Delay defeat & extract compromises

6. Play your opponent (use flattery, anger, theatrics to achieve goals)

I've covered ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's tactics fully in this thread๐Ÿ‘‡

Read 18 tweets
Jan 2
India's foreign policy needs upgrades, says Parliament

Despite ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's growing strength, it's held back acc. to Asia Power Index

-5th in diplomatic network (behind S.KOR)

-5th in multilateral pwr (<Indonesia)

-9th in foreign policy (<Taiwan)

๐Ÿงตon 5 upgrades ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ needs๐Ÿ‘‡(1/11)
(2/11)

Change 1: Double ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's diplomatic budget

Currently, MEA has a budget of 17,250 crore (just 0.44% of GDP)

That makes it one of ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's poorer Ministries

A/c to US General James Mattis: "if you don't fund the diplomatic service fully, buy me more ammo b'cuz I'll need it"
(3/11)

Parliament's Standing Committee on External Affairs on MEA's budget: "we do not find such an allocation in consonance with the country's rising aspirations and growing global stature"

P'ment Recommendation: more than double MEA's budget to 1% of GDP (~39k crore rupees)๐Ÿ‘‡
Read 11 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
China's diplomats were once masters of negotiation

They honed their tactics over decades to:

-Face down great powers like ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ&๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ
-Take on ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ in Asia
-Hide๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's ambitions for power

A ๐Ÿงตon ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's most potent negotiating tactics๐Ÿ‘‡ (1/15)

(From @VGokhale59's "The Long Game")
(2/15)

Tactic 1: Win negotiations before they've even begun

How?
1. Do your homework: know everything abt. your opponent, what their position is, what they've said in the past
2. Psychological tricks help. For example, negotiating on home ground works for you
(3/15)

Example: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ outplayed ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ in 1949 when diplomatic ties were established

- ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณdid its homework on ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ leaders like Nehru & figured he was desperate to recognise ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ's new govt for goodwill

-Knowing this, ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ called ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's rep. to Beijing rather than go to Delhi as a power move
Read 15 tweets
Dec 16, 2022
China keeps making the same three mistakes dealing with India

These mistakes caused the 1962 war and the 2020 Galwan clashes

A ๐Ÿงตon how these errors created Asia's greatest rivalry๐Ÿ‘‡

Spoiler: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ doesn't, and never has, respected ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ as an independent power (1/12)
(2/12) Mistake 1: Misjudging ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ has misjudged ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ since the 1940's

Its mistake:๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ believes ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ isn't an independent pwr & doesn't treat it as an equal

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ is seen as a lackey dependent on major powers like ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ & ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ

This misjudgement has haunted every Chinese leader from Mao
(3/12) This view of ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ dates back to before 1947

Mao saw Nehru as an "American running dog" and a "collaborator" of imperialism

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ did not understand ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ's non-alignment neutrality

Rather than acknowledge ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ as independent decision maker, ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ saw New Delhi as US collaborator
Read 12 tweets
Dec 14, 2022
Everything is falling into place in India's quest to be a great pwr
- $3.5tn econ that will double by 2031
- 2.6 million+ strong military w. 3rd highest def. spending
-183 million+ demographic dividend

But IND's diplomats admitted there's one thing we're not doing right๐Ÿ‘‡(1/11)
(2/11)Parliament and the MEA say IND's soft power strategy needs work

What soft pwr is: 'the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercionโ€™

Soft pwr works through attraction and by getting ppl. to want what you want
(3/11)Most interesting example of soft pwr: US used culture as Cold War weapon. It invited leaders, thinkers from many ctries to visit US & live the American life.

The goal: show them the pwr of the US system (free mkt, democracy) & get them to want the same things
Read 11 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
There's one Western ally that envies India's independent stance on Ukraine

-$2 trillion economy
-3,000,000+ strong military
- 7th most powerful country in Asia (Lowy Inst.)

IND's UKR policy has come up repeatedly in my conversations with this ctry's diplomats

Find out๐Ÿ‘‡(1/9)
(2/9) That country is South Korea

It's a US military ally and a robust democracy that aligns with the West

S. Korea also sanctioned Russ. after its invasion of Ukraine

Despite that, the Korean diplomats and scholars I've spoken to envy India's UKR policy
(3/9) The reason: because Seoul was never keen to slap sanctions on Moscow.

S. Korea wanted good ties with Russ. because of its influence with the nuclear armed N.Korea. Moscow is also a market for Korean firms like Samsung

Like IND, Seoul was looking out for natl. interest
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(