America began its rise as a great power in the 1880s
India's ascent to great power status will play out in the 2020s
3 revolutions allowed ๐บ๐ธ to transform into a global pwr
Are those revolutions playing out in ๐ฎ๐ณ?
๐งตon parallel trends & the one thing holding ๐ฎ๐ณ back ๐(1/21)
(2/21)
๐บ๐ธ's rise took place after the 1880s, also known as the "Gilded Age"
The Gilded Age was characterised by
- an exploding domestic economy
- social problems like inequality
- growing military pwr
- weak presidents
- rising expectations & disappointing performance
(3/21)
Prior to this, ๐บ๐ธ's focus had been almost totally domestic
- Economic Revolution
- Government & Military Revolution
- Ideological Revolution
Each of these transformed ๐บ๐ธ & set it on the path to great power status
(4/21)
Revolution 1: Economics
๐บ๐ธ's economy grew at breakneck speed during the Gilded Age
New infrastructure like railroads allowed heavy industry to take off
- Real wage growth of 60%
- Millions pulled out of poverty
- Massive innovation (Edison, Westinghouse etc)
(5/21)
Despite massive econ inequality, poverty & abuses of labour rights, ๐บ๐ธ's econ growth was real & Americans grew richer
By start of 20th century, ๐บ๐ธ led world in industrial production
This meant ๐บ๐ธ had a crucial tool it had lacked before: nat'l wealth
(6/21)
Revolution 2: Government & Military
In 1881, Chile threatened to sink ๐บ๐ธ's Pacific naval squadron
Chile may have succeeded since the US Navy was in terrible shape w. little investment
20 yrs later, Teddy Roosevelt could send the Great White Fleet to project ๐บ๐ธ pwr
Why?
(7/21)
๐บ๐ธ began to acquire state & military power by
- Reforming the corrupt civil service
- Changes to the tax code that allowed increased revenues
- Using natl. wealth to transform ๐บ๐ธ's wooden navy into a modern battle fleet
- Established institutions Naval War College
(8/21)
Revolution 3: Ideology
Ideology transformed ๐บ๐ธ's national wealth and govt reforms into great power status
Thinkers like Frederick Jackson Turner & Brooks Adams transformed ๐บ๐ธ's inward looking natl ideology
(9/21)
Post 1860s civil war, ๐บ๐ธ's focus was on healing the ctry
By the Gilded Age, that goal was achieved & econ growth increased
However, social unrest & repeated econ recession caused tensions domestically
Turner, Adams & others believed only foreign expansion could save ๐บ๐ธ
(10/21)
They convinced Americans that
- ๐บ๐ธ had to secure new overseas markets
- ๐บ๐ธ had a moral duty abroad due to racial & religious superiority
- ๐บ๐ธ people were "the most capable of bringing civilization, commerce, and peaceful interdependence to the world."
(11/21)
๐บ๐ธ ideology allowed politicians like Cleveland & Roosevelt to:
-Begin transformation from ๐บ๐ธ's inward to global vision
-Gain public support for funding expensive programs like modernization of US Navy
-Rally citizens behind wars against foreign pwrs (Spain)
(12/21)
๐ฎ๐ณ's post-1991 story has interesting parallels to ๐บ๐ธ's Gilded Age
Similarity 1: The social setting
-Weak national governments (until 2014, no single party won a majority)
-Rapid economic growth w. inequality
-Increased military power (2022 defence budget is 10x 1991)
(13/21)
-Widespread corruption & disappointing governance performance
-Power in hands of massive business houses (๐บ๐ธ had Standard Oil, ๐ฎ๐ณ has Reliance & Adani)
For more on how we're living in a Gilded Age with ๐ฎ๐ณ characteristics, check out @jamescrabtree's "Billionaire Raj" ๐
(14/21)
Similarity 2: Economic Revolution
Like ๐บ๐ธ, ๐ฎ๐ณ has seen impressive econ. growth since '91:
- Nominal GDP 2022 ๐ 12 times
- Per capita income๐6 fold
- Major poverty relief
Like 1880s ๐บ๐ธ, massive poverty & inequality remain
However, this wealth has allowed๐in natl. pwr
(15/21)
Similarity 3: Govt. & Military Revolution
๐ฎ๐ณ has made reforms to๐institutional pwr:
- Econ. reforms like GST๐state ability to collect revenue & fund natl. development
- Military reforms like Chief of Defence Staff (institutional) & major inductions (aircraft carrier)
(16/21)
But there's a key difference: Ideology
๐บ๐ธ's ideology in 1880s
-๐global US presence was solution to domestic crises
- foreign markets will absorb ๐บ๐ธ's econ. potential
- ๐บ๐ธ has moral duty to "uplift" & "christianize" the world
๐ฎ๐ณ doesn't have a comparable ideology
(17/21)
Disclaimer: ๐บ๐ธ ideology was heavily tinged with cultural, racial & moral superiority towards other groups
Not suggesting for a moment that ๐ฎ๐ณ should emulate this
My limited point is that ๐บ๐ธ's ideology resonated w. people & made moral & practical case for ๐ global role
(18/21)
Closest thing ๐ฎ๐ณ has to an outward facing nat'l ideology: idea of ๐ฎ๐ณ as "Vishwaguru"
What this is
-Promotes ๐ฎ๐ณ's econ strength & vibrant democracy as example to world
But Vishwaguru has key weaknesses as a national ideology that promotes ๐ฎ๐ณ's rise as a great power
(19/21)
Vishwaguru's current weakness
- Doesn't make popular moral case for incrsd. ๐ฎ๐ณ global role (๐บ๐ธ wanted to spread democracy)
- Doesn't make strong practical case for ๐ฎ๐ณ's role (๐บ๐ธ sought external markets)
- Little mass appeal as foreign affairs is seen as elite playground
(19/21)
-Isn't used to mobilise citizens for great causes
Result:
-Despite๐demands, ๐ฎ๐ณ's diplomatic budget is small
-Organisations like ICCR promoting ๐ฎ๐ณ values underfunded
-Public largely focused on internal challenges w/o a sense of what ๐ฎ๐ณ is trying to achieve in world
(20/21)
What needs to change:
- Make practical case to Indians for incr. global role (๐ฎ๐ณ needs foreign markets, must stop ๐จ๐ณ)
- Make a coherent moral case (world needs ๐ฎ๐ณ sober diplomatic style, democratic values)
- Bring foreign affairs to the people (๐ฎ๐ณ using G20 for this)
(21/21)
Essentially, Vishwaguru or any ideology needs more details, articulate practical and moral concerns better & expand beyond a slogan used by politicians to become a concept that all of ๐ฎ๐ณ identifies with
๐ฎ๐ณ can then fuse wealth, military pwr & ideology to cement rise
Disclaimer:
I'm not trying to make exact comparisons since we're talking about vastly different ctries rising in entirely different int'l environments.
That said, the goal is to point to broad trends & curious similarities between the rise of ๐บ๐ธ & ๐ฎ๐ณ
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Despite ๐ฎ๐ณ's growing strength, it's held back acc. to Asia Power Index
-5th in diplomatic network (behind S.KOR)
-5th in multilateral pwr (<Indonesia)
-9th in foreign policy (<Taiwan)
๐งตon 5 upgrades ๐ฎ๐ณ needs๐(1/11)
(2/11)
Change 1: Double ๐ฎ๐ณ's diplomatic budget
Currently, MEA has a budget of 17,250 crore (just 0.44% of GDP)
That makes it one of ๐ฎ๐ณ's poorer Ministries
A/c to US General James Mattis: "if you don't fund the diplomatic service fully, buy me more ammo b'cuz I'll need it"
(3/11)
Parliament's Standing Committee on External Affairs on MEA's budget: "we do not find such an allocation in consonance with the country's rising aspirations and growing global stature"
P'ment Recommendation: more than double MEA's budget to 1% of GDP (~39k crore rupees)๐
Tactic 1: Win negotiations before they've even begun
How? 1. Do your homework: know everything abt. your opponent, what their position is, what they've said in the past 2. Psychological tricks help. For example, negotiating on home ground works for you
(3/15)
Example: ๐จ๐ณ outplayed ๐ฎ๐ณ in 1949 when diplomatic ties were established
- ๐จ๐ณdid its homework on ๐ฎ๐ณ leaders like Nehru & figured he was desperate to recognise ๐จ๐ณ's new govt for goodwill
-Knowing this, ๐จ๐ณ called ๐ฎ๐ณ's rep. to Beijing rather than go to Delhi as a power move
Everything is falling into place in India's quest to be a great pwr
- $3.5tn econ that will double by 2031
- 2.6 million+ strong military w. 3rd highest def. spending
-183 million+ demographic dividend
But IND's diplomats admitted there's one thing we're not doing right๐(1/11)
(2/11)Parliament and the MEA say IND's soft power strategy needs work
What soft pwr is: 'the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercionโ
Soft pwr works through attraction and by getting ppl. to want what you want
(3/11)Most interesting example of soft pwr: US used culture as Cold War weapon. It invited leaders, thinkers from many ctries to visit US & live the American life.
The goal: show them the pwr of the US system (free mkt, democracy) & get them to want the same things