Rose Abramoff (@ultracricket) and I jumped up on a stage at a climate science conference begging our colleagues to speak out. Rose was fired for it.
We are doing everything we can to urge society to address Earth breakdown and we are being censured for it nytimes.com/2023/01/10/opi…
This was at #AGU22 in Chicago in December. For two weeks after the action, I thought I might get fired as well. "I knew that I could face retaliation. But inaction during this critical time will have far greater consequences."
This is part of why I haven't been on social media a lot lately. I sought solace in simply doing my work. Just got some very important results, I think, on extreme humid heat. If I do get fired, for me the greatest loss would be getting cut off from continuing that critical work.
I do feel like Rose and I (and others) are fighting for the survival of a society that doesn't want us to fight for it, and even wants to punish us for it. And that sucks. But I'll keep fighting until the end, until I can't, because for me it's simply the far better option.
I've got so much more to say on all of this. But saying it is also challenging and time consuming. This action, and also the last time we got arrested (at the Charlotte private jet terminal) were barely noticed by anyone. I'd honestly much rather just do science. but... my kids
Here is my comment on Rose's op ed, fwiw.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The reasons I expected it to be a failure: 1. They once again let in the fossil fuel industry in a massive way. 2. COP26 was not widely recognized as the failure it was. 3. There were no significant changes from COP26. Maybe due to #2. Lessons were not learned. (See #1).
Once there is a firewall in place excluding the fossil fuel industry and corporate sponsorship, and once there is some mechanism for ignoring fossil fuel industry states (Saudi Arabia) then we can expect success. And we SHOULD be expecting MUCH more from the COP process.
So far, it seems that #COP27 is an even bigger failure than COP26:
💀 25% more fossil fuel lobbyists than COP26 - the largest delegate group
💀 best outcome might be avoiding backslide from COP26
💀 even weaker language on ending fossil fuel subsidies
💀 sponsored by Coca Cola
These people need a firewall against the fossil fuel industry and they need to bring in climate activists especially youth and Global South activists. Otherwise it will remain a farce.
What kind of a climate meeting makes no attempt to phase out oil and fossil gas, when fossil fuels in general are the main cause of the crisis? And loss and damage numbers are inching up toward $100 million - 0.01% what US spends on military in a year
I don't think there should be any temperature target. People are already dying and the fossil fuel industry has already caused severe, irreversible damage. I think the goal should be to end the fossil fuel industry in the Global North by 2030 or faster, on a binding schedule
This is what we should be doing if we want to maximize the odds of avoiding civilizational collapse. Because Earth breakdown is already having deeper impacts to our civilization than we expected. Uncertainty is NOT our friend here.
Furthermore, the social dynamic of distant-seeming goals coupled with international non-coordination, media failure, and fossil fuel industry bad faith is a recipe for continued non-action.
Today I was arrested for the second time trying to increase public urgency about Earth breakdown along with about 80 other scientists and many others. I was released and I’m fine, but tired. We worked very hard for weeks.
We’re on the right side of history, but it feels like we’re losing badly. We need reinforcements. Civil disobedients and others.
Meanwhile it doesn’t take a scientist to know that every summer will be hotter than the last and lots of things will break as a result. Planet-scaled things. The disregard in our society for this fundamental fact is still stunning to me.
All right, I supect this account has been shadow-banned due to today's tweets getting about a fifth the engagement of normal. Maybe due to having a Mastodon handle in my name for a few days. Is anyone else clearly experiencing this?
This is part of what I mean when I say I'll stay active on twitter until I feel it is no longer tenable.
The effect is quite pronounced, because I have developed a very good sense concerning how certain tweets will perform, and we're talking about a factor of about 5. But at the same time you can't be totally sure.
Some thoughts (and questions) on #COP27.
First, if no plan for quickly ramping down the fossil fuel industry comes out of the meeting, it's a failure. That's the bottom line. Fossil fuels are the cause. Ramping down that industry MUST be the very core of any solutions package.
Roughly 75% or 80% of global heating is from the fossil fuel industry while roughly 15% is from animal agriculture. These industries must be ramped down to stem the irreversible planetary damage. But they will fight - they are very rich and they give "donations" to politicians.
So there needs to be a clear step-by-step plan for ramping down the fossil fuel and animal ag industries. This conclusion is inescapable. And the rich countries of the Global North need to go faster than the poor countries of the Global South, for moral and practical reasons