Turkey looked to be heading toward trouble in the summer of 2022: it was selling reserves to cover a growing current account deficit.
But Erdogan pulled a rabbit or two out of the hat in the H2 2022; reserves are now rising even with the persistent external deficit.
1/x
To be sure, Turkey's balance of payments doesn't look healthy --
There hasn't been any real demand for Turkey's government debt for a while (especially the TL bonds, but recent FX issue largely offset earlier maturities)
2/
And the banks understandable don't want to rollover costly long-term (often 1 year + 1 day) loans -- they have more domestic deposits than they need in any case.
3/
So the current account deficit hasn't been financed by relatively more stable long-term flows --
4/
Rather the bulk of the inflow -- setting "errors" aside -- has come from potentially risky short-term deposits (and a reduction in the banks' external liquidity buffer, which is part of the "net" deposit flow)
5/
Zooming in a bit, the recent rebound in reserves has mostly come from:
-- the Rosatom loan (the yellow bar)
-- CBRT swaps + cross border deposits (from geopolitical friends of Turkey)
-- renewed Eurobond issuance (some likely to Turkish banks)
6/
But the CBRT's reserves have been increasing faster than its external debt -- there isn't any imminent risk that Turkey is going to run out.
(of course, having $70b in reserves/ $20b in illiquid currencies isn't great if you have $30b or so in external debt)
7/
The November reverse increase though was a bit bigger than can be explained by the eurobond issue.
As this chart illustrates Turkey's banks also ran down their stock of offshore deposits (more than covering external debt repayment)
(Chart sums flows to infer stocks)
8/
Turkey still isn't in a great place. I wouldn't want to manage an economy when the central banks net fx position is negative by any measure. And the end December reserves dipped a bit.
But Ergogan's geo-financial strategy has bought Turkey a bit of time.
9/9
p.s. the chart above nets out illiquid reserves from the swaps with Qatar and the UAE to try to estimate liquid reserve assets. I also netted out the PBOC swap as I am not sure that the CBRT's CNY are usable, but I don't have a strong view on that specific adjustment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Jason Douglass and Jonathan Cheng in the WSJ -- the Trade War Didn't Change China.
In fact, China's economy is more unbalanced and more reliant on exports for the demand than it was when section 301 case first started
1/
Open trade failed, spectacularly, to liberalize China's political system.
More restricted trade if anything led China to double down on its manufacturing intensive, channel capital to industry model
2/
I think it is fair to say that China has weaponized the chokepoints generated by its control over the supply of critical inputs (rare earths, magnets, legacy chips, processing of chips) quite effectively --
China's goods and services data on a balance of payments basis is now effectively out for q3 (with the September monthly data) -- and on a balance of payments basis, exports jumped up a bit in q3
1/
The q2 surplus using China's (whacky) BoP methodology was well below the q2 customs surplus -- but the q3 BoP surplus is strong, and up v q2 (while the customs surplus is down)
2/
So my estimate for the q3 current account surplus is just over $200b ($800b annualized) -- or well above q2 ...
There needs to be a better consensus number for the tariff on China. The effective tariff rate (Tariff paid/ imports) was 37-38% in July and August. It should fall to under 30% with the recent deal.
As @EtraAlex notes, that is still higher than the effective tariff rate on most other countries (India is a bit of an outlier, but there should be a deal) -- the electronics exclusion lowers the effective tariff on SE Asia ...
2/
There of course is a lot of sectoral variability in the tariffs -- all sorts of 232s that knock out the reciprocal tariffs, and in some cases (electronics/ chips & pharma) that has really lowered the actual applied tariff (same for the USMCA exclusion)
3/
China's currency is objectively very weak, especially in inflation adjusted terms (it is down just under 20% from its 2021 high). And it is very tightly managed against the dollar --
But within that broad regime, there has been a tiny bit of appreciation over the last 6ms
1/ many
And to be sure, the movement is primarily against the dollar -- the yuan remains incredibly weak against the euro (contributing to the second China shock, China's rising share of the EU auto market & German automotive angst)
2/
There is something technically very strange about the yuan's appreciation -- it has come even though the onshore spot rate has remained weaker than the daily fix (in theory the mid point of the band). That is strange ...
China, the unexpected "winner" from Trump's second term trade war?
Bringing the Trump 2 tariff on China down to 20% (10% reciprocal, 10% fentanyl) is a huge win for China; it puts the new tariffs at the same level as the new tariffs on SE Asia
1/
The new tariffs on China would also only be 5 pp higher than the tariffs on US allies like Japan and Korea (and most European countries) ... massive shift away from the campaign proposal
There is a myth that the average tariff on China is now 55%
("it would bring the average tariff on most Chinese imports—currently around 55%—to about 45%. That would put China’s average tariff rate closer to those of other trading partners")
3/
Excellent piece by @AnaSwanson on the now expected Trump-Xi trade deal/ truce/ US walk back
Agree with Mr. Czin. The most remarkable thing about the current US trade agenda with China is all the things that aren't on it. I would include currency on that list of course
1/
The best argument for the limited US agenda is that the US lacks the leverage to get China to fundamentally change, so the best the US can hope for is selling some beans and getting export licenses for rare earths
As the FT notes in a very good leader, China's leaders just doubled down on a manufacturing led growth strategy )"there is no retreat from the manufacturing-led development pursued under the current five-year plan")