Turkey looked to be heading toward trouble in the summer of 2022: it was selling reserves to cover a growing current account deficit.
But Erdogan pulled a rabbit or two out of the hat in the H2 2022; reserves are now rising even with the persistent external deficit.
1/x
To be sure, Turkey's balance of payments doesn't look healthy --
There hasn't been any real demand for Turkey's government debt for a while (especially the TL bonds, but recent FX issue largely offset earlier maturities)
2/
And the banks understandable don't want to rollover costly long-term (often 1 year + 1 day) loans -- they have more domestic deposits than they need in any case.
3/
So the current account deficit hasn't been financed by relatively more stable long-term flows --
4/
Rather the bulk of the inflow -- setting "errors" aside -- has come from potentially risky short-term deposits (and a reduction in the banks' external liquidity buffer, which is part of the "net" deposit flow)
5/
Zooming in a bit, the recent rebound in reserves has mostly come from:
-- the Rosatom loan (the yellow bar)
-- CBRT swaps + cross border deposits (from geopolitical friends of Turkey)
-- renewed Eurobond issuance (some likely to Turkish banks)
6/
But the CBRT's reserves have been increasing faster than its external debt -- there isn't any imminent risk that Turkey is going to run out.
(of course, having $70b in reserves/ $20b in illiquid currencies isn't great if you have $30b or so in external debt)
7/
The November reverse increase though was a bit bigger than can be explained by the eurobond issue.
As this chart illustrates Turkey's banks also ran down their stock of offshore deposits (more than covering external debt repayment)
(Chart sums flows to infer stocks)
8/
Turkey still isn't in a great place. I wouldn't want to manage an economy when the central banks net fx position is negative by any measure. And the end December reserves dipped a bit.
But Ergogan's geo-financial strategy has bought Turkey a bit of time.
9/9
p.s. the chart above nets out illiquid reserves from the swaps with Qatar and the UAE to try to estimate liquid reserve assets. I also netted out the PBOC swap as I am not sure that the CBRT's CNY are usable, but I don't have a strong view on that specific adjustment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Secretary Bessent has a bit of work to do to convince Americans (and perhaps the market) that the bailout of Argentina (and direct peso purchases):
a) will work
b) is a good idea
1/
My former colleague Mark Sobel
“Were the United States to offer Argentina a longer-term support package to back an unsustainable exchange rate, that would be a major folly and waste of U.S. taxpayer resources"
2/
There is a pretty broad consensus that putting US money into Argentina to backstop the current exchange rate regime (i.e. the peso's current trading band) isn't a good use of taxpayer funds
The IMF needs to take a serious look at its methodology for forecasting the current account balance in key countries -- the current approach is yielding somewhat absurd outcomes that forecast real problems (notably China's surplus) away
1/
The WEO forecast for China's 2025 surplus is 3.3% of GDP (the h1 surplus) so an upward adjustment from the absurd $370b surplus in the ESR. That surplus is forecast to fall to 2.8% of GDP in 26, and then down to 2% of GDP in 2020. No problem here worth global concern ...
2/
The basis for the forecast seems to be Chinese policies that now support domestic demand ..
"China and Germany have recently announced and expanded spending measures to boost domestic demand, which will lower net savings and reduce external surpluses"
3/
Building out capacity (including refining capacity) for rare earths/ other critical minerals should indeed by a real priority now, and the risk of weaponization of this this and other supply chains should have been taken more seriously in the past. But it won't be easy
Just as an example of how far the political debate has come -- Bob Lighthizer (no China dove) excluded rare earths and permanent magnets from the 301 tariffs back in 18 and 19 ...
3/
Pharmaceuticals from China too (why raise the price of meds ... )
For rare earths and magnets there was essentially no US supply, so the tariffs just raised costs (absent a plant o build out capacity over time)
4/
China -- per the excellent reporting on the WSJ/ @Lingling_Wei -- appears to be pursuing a strategy of applying maximum pressure in pursuit of maximum concessions ... full tariff rollback, rollback of export controls, relaxation of nat'l security review on Chinese investment
1/
China though may have miscalculated -- Trump's "Truth" suggested real frustration. Betting on an even bigger (and more publicly visible TACO) has its own risks
China really has put its full economic toolkit on the table -- using its control of grain and oil seed imports (COFCO) to zero out orders for beans (having a bit of a stockpile helps), and rolling out an extraordinary set of export controls ...
3/
There are rumors -- based on material reported in the Argentine press -- that suggest the US lifeline to Argentina will be funded using Special Drawing Right certificates, and that the BCRA will on lend some funds to the MoF to do bond buybacks ...
1/
The logic of using the SDRs (The Treasury technically borrows dollars from the Fed using SDR certificates as collateral) is simple: the ESF has $173b of SDRs, and only ~ $23b of dollars ...
2/
So if the US is thinking that the $20b may not be enough (and if it is financing bond buybacks as well as a peso defense it may not be enough ... ) using SDRs opens a path to an even bigger program