Turkey looked to be heading toward trouble in the summer of 2022: it was selling reserves to cover a growing current account deficit.
But Erdogan pulled a rabbit or two out of the hat in the H2 2022; reserves are now rising even with the persistent external deficit.
1/x
To be sure, Turkey's balance of payments doesn't look healthy --
There hasn't been any real demand for Turkey's government debt for a while (especially the TL bonds, but recent FX issue largely offset earlier maturities)
2/
And the banks understandable don't want to rollover costly long-term (often 1 year + 1 day) loans -- they have more domestic deposits than they need in any case.
3/
So the current account deficit hasn't been financed by relatively more stable long-term flows --
4/
Rather the bulk of the inflow -- setting "errors" aside -- has come from potentially risky short-term deposits (and a reduction in the banks' external liquidity buffer, which is part of the "net" deposit flow)
5/
Zooming in a bit, the recent rebound in reserves has mostly come from:
-- the Rosatom loan (the yellow bar)
-- CBRT swaps + cross border deposits (from geopolitical friends of Turkey)
-- renewed Eurobond issuance (some likely to Turkish banks)
6/
But the CBRT's reserves have been increasing faster than its external debt -- there isn't any imminent risk that Turkey is going to run out.
(of course, having $70b in reserves/ $20b in illiquid currencies isn't great if you have $30b or so in external debt)
7/
The November reverse increase though was a bit bigger than can be explained by the eurobond issue.
As this chart illustrates Turkey's banks also ran down their stock of offshore deposits (more than covering external debt repayment)
(Chart sums flows to infer stocks)
8/
Turkey still isn't in a great place. I wouldn't want to manage an economy when the central banks net fx position is negative by any measure. And the end December reserves dipped a bit.
But Ergogan's geo-financial strategy has bought Turkey a bit of time.
9/9
p.s. the chart above nets out illiquid reserves from the swaps with Qatar and the UAE to try to estimate liquid reserve assets. I also netted out the PBOC swap as I am not sure that the CBRT's CNY are usable, but I don't have a strong view on that specific adjustment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Official demand has been extremely flat the last two years -- with Chinese sales offset by other countries purchases. China is adjusted for Euroclear -- and Chinese sales were stronger in 23 and early 24 than in recent months ...
2/
And unlike in 22 and 23, China is letting its Agency book roll off -- so on net it looks to be reducing its US bond holdings in the US data (subject to the caveat that it may be using custodians other than Euroclear more intensively)
China doesn't have one industrial policy; it has 30!
Just a portion of the insights in Bloomberg's big take on where China's economy now stands.
1/many
As this chart shows, China has not yet reversed the fall in the consumption share of its economy that occurred after Zhu Rongji's reforms, & coincided with WTO entry. In my NYT piece, I argued that this is China's original sin: it created a structurally unbalanced economy
2/
Bloomberg notes -- I would argue correctly -- that "a more decisive shift toward domestic consumption is needed to meet the country’s long-term goals" and also highlights the impediments to such a shift
A chart showing imports in some the sectors where the Trump Administration is likely considering sectoral 232 tariffs --
The US imports almost as many pharmaceuticals as it does finished cars (and pharma imports from Ireland are about equal to vehicle imports from Mexico)
1/
And a chart showing why tariffs on semiconductors (imports of around $60b) are no substitute for a "CHIPS act" -- imports of semiconductors are only 1/5th of imports of products that use semiconductors
2/
Tariff semiconductors but not circuit boards and the US will import circuit boards; tariff chips but not computers, routers and phones and the US will import computers, routers and phones
3/
I understand the political logic of an IMF/ Milei alliance -- it highlights the IMF's utility to the new US administration.
But increased the IMF's net exposure to Argentina when the peso is enormously overvalued is a classic error --
1/
Argentina's fiscal looks better than the IMF expected pre-Milei (though the non transferable USD bills held by the BCRA mask the true fiscal deficit/ true interest expense). The BoP tho looks bad -- the predictable result of an overvalued peso.
2/
The IMF's classic error in Argentina (imo) hasn't been financing bad fiscal -- it has been funding an overvalued exchange rate and the current account deficit (covering interest payments to IMF = CA financing!)
The tariffs on China (and on Apple, 20% of the $400 import price of an iphone is $80) have rightly been overshadowed by the tariffs on Canada/ Mexico.
But China has said it will retaliate, which means US agricultural exports to China will get a new moment in the sun
1/
One thing about agricultural exports is that they are, well, seasonal. The biggest US ag export to China by far is soybeans, and the '24 harvest has already shipped out ...
2/
Soybean exports to China are within shouting distance of their pre-trade war levels, but never quite recovered (this is clear in a chart of US v Brazilian exports). But they are high enough to make farmers nervous about a new ' bean embargo ...
3/