Turkey looked to be heading toward trouble in the summer of 2022: it was selling reserves to cover a growing current account deficit.
But Erdogan pulled a rabbit or two out of the hat in the H2 2022; reserves are now rising even with the persistent external deficit.
1/x
To be sure, Turkey's balance of payments doesn't look healthy --
There hasn't been any real demand for Turkey's government debt for a while (especially the TL bonds, but recent FX issue largely offset earlier maturities)
2/
And the banks understandable don't want to rollover costly long-term (often 1 year + 1 day) loans -- they have more domestic deposits than they need in any case.
3/
So the current account deficit hasn't been financed by relatively more stable long-term flows --
4/
Rather the bulk of the inflow -- setting "errors" aside -- has come from potentially risky short-term deposits (and a reduction in the banks' external liquidity buffer, which is part of the "net" deposit flow)
5/
Zooming in a bit, the recent rebound in reserves has mostly come from:
-- the Rosatom loan (the yellow bar)
-- CBRT swaps + cross border deposits (from geopolitical friends of Turkey)
-- renewed Eurobond issuance (some likely to Turkish banks)
6/
But the CBRT's reserves have been increasing faster than its external debt -- there isn't any imminent risk that Turkey is going to run out.
(of course, having $70b in reserves/ $20b in illiquid currencies isn't great if you have $30b or so in external debt)
7/
The November reverse increase though was a bit bigger than can be explained by the eurobond issue.
As this chart illustrates Turkey's banks also ran down their stock of offshore deposits (more than covering external debt repayment)
(Chart sums flows to infer stocks)
8/
Turkey still isn't in a great place. I wouldn't want to manage an economy when the central banks net fx position is negative by any measure. And the end December reserves dipped a bit.
But Ergogan's geo-financial strategy has bought Turkey a bit of time.
9/9
p.s. the chart above nets out illiquid reserves from the swaps with Qatar and the UAE to try to estimate liquid reserve assets. I also netted out the PBOC swap as I am not sure that the CBRT's CNY are usable, but I don't have a strong view on that specific adjustment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sometimes you just have to admire how strange the world can be -- Korea's May current account surplus was over $38 billion or $450 billion annualized
Absolutely massive number, the trailing 12m sum hasn't yet caught up
1/
What's more, the massive surplus was offset by massive equity outflows. Primarily foreigners selling Korean equities (presumably to avoid concentration limits ...)
2/
I never expected this kind of surplus (Korea and Taiwan are on a trajectory where they could post a surplus the size of China's reported surplus, i.e ~ $700b, this year) could be balanced by equally large net equity flows --
The most important thing to know about the international financial system right now is that the dollar's share of a global equity market index is higher than the dollar's share of official fx reserves
One manifestation of the "profit dollar" and a global financial system built around the hope that US will deliver exceptional returns (not safety or necessarily liquidity): an unusual share of the US external deficit has been funded by return seeking flows
2/
state asset accumulation hasn't disappeared -- I estimate $600b in flows from reserve managers/ Chinese state banks and global SWFs into dollar assets.
But most of the flow is into institutions that seek return not just safety and liquidity
"This economic logic is flawed—China is suffering a property bust similar to Japan’s all on its own, without Plaza-like constraints"
1/
Despite the protests from the Global Times and its echo chamber on this and other sites, I am a bit more optimistic about the possibility that China may agree to allow the CNY to appreciate than the Economist
China won't agree to a "Plaza" deal (any deal will certainly have a different name) but it has allowed its currency to appreciate in the past. The CNY depreciation from 01 to 06 was a big reason for the first China shock & its 07 to 13 appreciation a big part of the solution
Adam Tooze has highlighted work from the CF40 that attributes the shift in China's trade balance with Germany entirely to autos. Using the Chinese data I get a different result (autos are big, but only ~ 1/3 the change)
1/
The detailed data shows that most of China's surplus categories (let by electronics -- a broad category that includes phones and car batteries and chips) are growing, while most of Germany's surplus categories are shrinking. Machinery flipped into a deficit last year
2/
For the EU as a whole, autos are a bit more than a third of the swing (Germany imports relatively few autos from China, so for Germany it is mostly an export swing) and transportation equipment is about half the swing
The first error is that it is an unreasonable ask from uncompetitive economies. That uncompetitiveness is a function in part of price, and China is the one actively intervening in the market to hold the yuan down. the settlement numbers should this clearly
2/
nominal and real appreciation was also part of the solution to the first China shock -- if China doesn't want a negotiated deal, fine ... the PBoC already knows how to manage the yuan stronger on its own and China doesn't need big surpluses to generate fx reserves these days
Trade diplomats the world over tend not to be the best macroeconomist --
"It [Chinese state media] said Chinese companies were no longer as concerned about the European market because they now had options such as south-east Asia or the Middle East."
1/
As the FT notes, China's surplus with SE Asia is a derivative of US tariffs/ low cost assembly of components in SE Asia ... basically it is a reflection of US demand
2/
in the Chinese data, the US, ASEAN and the EU general bilateral surpluses equal to about three quarters of China's global surplus (with some Asian netting of HK)
-- So the real statement is that the US market is still an alternative to the EU market right now