First, an evolutionary stress model would suggest that there is not a single "normal" response to stress, but rather that there is a wide range of responses that may be adaptive for different individuals or groups.
This perspective is consistent with the idea of neurodiversity, which recognizes that there is a wide range of variations in brain function and development that are normal and valuable.
Second, an evolutionary stress model would suggest that interventions for stress-related disorders should be tailored to an individual's unique genetic and environmental background.
This perspective also aligns with the idea and goals of #precisionmedicine, which aims to develop treatments that are tailored to an individual's unique characteristics and needs.
Third, an evolutionary stress model would consider trade-offs of adaptations, rather than pathologizing them, which aligns w the neurodiversity approach, which focuses on the strengths and potentials of people w different brain development, rather than deficits or disorders.
Lastly, an evolutionary stress model would suggest that interventions for stress-related conditions should focus on recalibration and balancing allostasis and homeostasis, not on curing to a norm, which aligns with both the principles of precision medicine and neurodiversity.
@UnrollHelper please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
