Thread by @CforWomenUK

1/5 "There is no symbol, word or sentence that should be beneath the legislator’s attention when it comes to the law."
To the @Conservatives who have signed this amendment, are you able to define your terms when talking about 'LGBTQ+"? 'LGB' is easy to define, but 'T' according

2/5 to Stonewall can include 'cross-dressers'; are we really legislating for cross-dressers? 'Q' can be 'queer', a word many gay men and lesbians find very offensive, or 'questioning'; questioning what exactly? As for '+', well anything goes there. In some corners of 'queer'

3/5 academic studies it includes 'furries', 'minor attracted persons' and heaven knows what else. Did you really put your names to this?
@aliciakearns @cj_dinenage @Tobias_Ellwood @William_Wragg @simonfell @ScottBentonMP @vickyford @JasonMcCartney @Mike_Fabricant @GarySambrook89

4/5 @CrispinBlunt @DSimmonds_RNP @Ben_Everitt @amandamilling @SarahAthertonMP @HeatherWheeler @DavidMundellDCT @LeeAndersonMP1 @JillMortimer4HP @ElliotColburn Holly Mumby-Croft, Mark Fletcher, Andrew Percy, Damien Moore

5/5 @specalot understands it; don't you? Please have a rethink!
#OnlineSafetyBill in HoC next week, 17th January
spectator.co.uk/article/the-pr…

The full list of MPs