3) That is, IMHO, the precise approach Pres. Trump should---must---take to reclaim the 5% of people who wouldn't vote for him again based on "Warp Speed."
4) The first move is that the gubment will claim it innocently went ahead with poison injections cuz Big Pharma lied.
5) Here is the key battle folks: at that point, Big Pharma, seeing their immunity threatened, will expose the gubment actors like Dr. Fallacy.
6) Either way, once fraud is proven anywhere, the immunity is gone and it's open season.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Paul Johnson was simply, to me, the best historian in the world. He could research vast galaxies of documents and tell a powerful, compelling story. nytimes.com/2023/01/12/boo…
2) Johnson had a scope that even people such as Stephen Ambrose of David McCullough or David Fischer didn't have.
3) His "Modern Times: A History of the World from the Twenties to the Nineties" is a must read for everyone. EVERYONE.
4) He was my inspiration for writing "A Patriot's History of the Modern World."
5) His "Intellectuals" is a fantastic look at these hypocritical pusguzzlers who try to tell the rest of us how to live.
6) He could be long winded: "Birth of the Modern" is nearly 1000 pp . . .
1) Time for a refresher on Rutabaga & the documents drop.
2) People are suggesting this is the way the DemoKKKrats "get rid of Biteme." Wrong.
3) No one---nobody in the DNC, nobody anywhere---wants the Laughing Hyena Kampuchea Harris as Pres.
4) They will not---cannot---take him out til they remove her.
5) However, they missed their window. The veep must be confirmed by BOTH houses. So prior to a few days ago, they could have put in whomever they wanted. (I maintain they REALLY want Buttplugs).
6) But by not forcing Harris out before the GOP took over, they are pretty much stuck with her barring extreme measures. I don't think they want her out that bad.
7) Which means they are stuck with Rutabaga.
8) Don't forget, the DemoKKKrats just finished restructuring primaries
2) First, very good sounds coming from McCarthy. He clearly knows he must appease MORE than 20, that he had a good 100 who voted for him but inwardly were siding with the 20.
2) Second, time and energy is limited. Don't forget the DemoKKKrats . . .
2) contd . . . did NOTHING for over a year except Patriot Day (J6) terrorism. Nothing.
3) I am completely convinced McCarthy & Rs WILL hold hearings, subpoena people, expose tons. They may send criminal referrals to the Department of InJustic . . . but those will go nowhere.
4) You all knew this. Just don't freak out when it happens. We have 1 and 1/2 of 2/3 of the gubment.
5) So: When it comes to "defund the entire DoInJustice," you know, right, they can't do that? I believe they can make very serious inroads on defunding the 87,00;
1) SPEAKER: Here is what I just got from a very conservative, pro-MAGA congressman re the situation. 2) The claim was that, for want of a better term, the "rebels" wanted rules changes. 3) According to Cong. X, McCarthy agreed to take the # of a motion to vacate down to one;
4) already agreed to limiting any role in primaries; 5) agreed to put them on the rules committee 6) Agreed to 36 rule changes in total. "A lot of things all of us agreed on. This is literally everything they've asked for. You ask them what more then want & they literally . . .
6) contd . . . cannot name any more." 7) X thinks this comes down to "people who have a real beef with McCarthy and are never going to support him." 8) (ME) IMPORTANT to understand who the Speaker is and what he does.
1) Since I mentioned it I might as well tell it:
In Feb 2017 Cruz was my guy. I met him at a Young America's event in NH.
Little things tell me a lot. I gave him a copy of "Patriot's History." Normally the response is "This is a great book" or "I've got 2 copies of this" . . .
2) Cruz's response, without looking at it (telling me he didn't know the book) was to hand it to his wife & hustle me in front of the camera. (I had the same experience with the Newtster).
3) Later we were right next to each other in the little NH airport. In his speech . . .
3) contd . . . he had mentioned "Medical Savings Accounts" (remember, Obamacare was still a big deal back then).
4) He was sitting at a table and I said, "Senator, good speech. Could I make a small suggestion?" (he nodded) I said, "I favor MSAs in principle. But . . .