In October of 2022 it was reported that there was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter, but it would be up to U.S. Attorney David Weiss who was overseeing the case.
They also mention the probe was focused on Hunter's dealings in China and Ukraine.
Exception 1: David Weiss - "overseeing the tax probe of Hunter Biden."
Exception 2: John Lausch
We don't know exactly what "sensitive" investigation Lausch was conducting in 2021, but we do know that on 11/14/22, AG Garland assigned Lausch to conduct the initial investigation on whether a Special Counsel was needed regarding Joe Biden's handling of Classified Docs.
If Sperry's tweet is true, then the only 2 Trump-appointed attorneys that were not asked to resign by Biden's DOJ are both connected to Biden's handling of Classified docs.
If Sperry's tweet is true, then the Weiss investigation into Hunter's overseas business dealings has not only evolved to include Joe Biden, but it has no doubt become a National Security matter.
Think about it logically.
How did an investigation that started with Hunter's business dealings result in a special counsel investigating Joe Biden's handling of classified docs...
If Sperry's tweet is true, then not only has Weiss discovered Joe Biden's involvement in Hunter's business dealings (10% for the big guy) but he has also discovered the existence of the then VP disclosing classified information in the process of those business dealings.
Remember that Weiss supposedly has enough evidence to charge Hunter. If it's true that he was the reason for this Special Counsel on Joe Biden, it's not much of a leap to think Weiss could have enough to charge Joe as well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump's Motion to Compel Discovery for his J6 case.
I will cover the highlights in this thread and add to it when I have the time. Including exhibits, it's 325 pages long.
We will be discussing this in detail on tomorrow night's show.
In this filing are many things I have written about in my series:
- Foreign interference in our elections
- EO 13848
- CISA
- Solar Winds Hack
- Minority view from the election ICA
- DNI Ratcliffe's disagreement
- J6 and the J6 committee
- Trump's response to foreign efforts
The central focus here is the 2020 Election. Jack Smith is trying to paint a picture that Trump was knowingly spreading "the Big Lie" that the election was stolen. Trump is contending that there exists evidence proving the opposite.
IRS Whistleblower testimony is leading me to believe there is an active investigation into Joe Biden - either part of the Robert Hur SCO or something else.
By now I'm sure most people have seen this "Whatsapp" message.
Damning.
But there is more...
As I posted earlier, testimony from the 2nd whistleblower confirmed there are ongoing investigations that are "spin-offs" of the Hunter Biden Investigation.
The whistleblower stated he would strive to protect those investigations.
Recently released communications between the Office of AG Barr and Durham reveal another individual who appeared to be jointly working with Durham at the onset of the Russia Collusion Hoax Probe.
Thread👇
Communications between former AG Bill Barr's aide, Seth Ducharme, and John Durham at the onset of Durham's probe into the origins of the Russia Collusion Hoax reveal that John appeared to be working with another individual to run the investigation.
"John and [redacted]"
An email exchange titled "Logistics for new project" show multiple occasions of Ducharme referring to two individuals, one of which is still redacted.
Ducharme even asked if a meeting time "works for you both" to which the response was "we will call you at 9am..."