Of course they weren't. How could they be if the AI used was not designed for that purpose and could not be fed with all the necessary input data?
The problem was that I didn't add a clear disclaimer at the beginning of the thread. Something like:
"Here's a half-hour NOT FORENSICALLY CORRECT experiment with MidJourney, to visually dream with the possibilities. No mummies suffered in the process. Come on in and enjoy!"
The fact is that, after spending a year non-stop experimenting with AI, sometimes I forget that not everyone who follows me understands that my intention is none other than to experiment with this technology in all possible ways and tell you all about it.
I enjoy it and many of those who follow me too. Fantasy or not.
Nevertheless. Could AI be used to generate scientifically correct reconstructions?
Of course yes, as in the rest of the fields, AI could also be applied here.
But not with #midjourney: it's not made for this. MJ already does many wonders, don't ask it that much.
We would need a specific AI, trained for this purpose, that could receive all the necessary data from the input. Among others: examinations of the skeletal remains (CT-scan or X-ray tomography), examinations of the preserved soft tissues, anatomical criteria, etc.
Disclaimer (just in case): I'm not an expert in forensic reconstructions, so I can't correctly list all the inputs that would be needed. You have to be careful on Twitter :)
The input data and the results of existing real works would be especially useful for training the model.
This could be done, so that it would be a significant sample to be able to feed the model, with blind tests: tests that are currently carried out in which input data is given to a professional (who does not see the photograph of the person trying to reconstruct )...
...but works with only the input data until it generates a 3d render or illustration. Finally, the result is compared with the real photograph of the person, to see if the process followed was correct or not.
It's not trivial, but a model trained on enough such examples, together perhaps with current diffusion models, could, hypothetically, do a very decent job of face reconstruction.
I don't think it's far away the day we see something like this.
And hey, I don't see anyone's work threatened: even with a great leap in automation and time savings, human supervision, touch-ups, adjustments, etc. will still be needed.
Well, let's go!
Now what I promised you: paint and color with @javilop!
Let's rebuild NON-FORENSICALLY reliable mummies!
The tool I used is midjourney.com. Interestingly, it is used from their Discord channel and/or by talking directly to their bot (if you upgrade to one of their paid plans).
For these "reconstructions" it is necessary to use an init image (the mummy). In this other thread I already explained how this could be done.
You will see that they all follow the same scheme.
1️⃣. Ramses II
Younger! Just change the age in the prompt, et voila!
2️⃣. The surfer guanche.
You were looking forward to it, I know.
By the way, in the professional reconstructions it seems that he actually had brown hair... although in the English Wikipedia they say: "including brown red hair"... so who knows.
3️⃣. Tollund Man.
Or at least, his head.
4️⃣ Lady Rai.
5️⃣. Menmaatre Seti I.
Tip: You can refine the image by using the image generated in the previous step as the input image. The prompt is the same, but in successive iterations it can acquire new nuances:
Utilicé la misma técnica para la segunda imagen de Lady Rai. Mi favorita de todo el hilo.
Thanks for reading!
Can't wait to see your mummies come to life! Show them to me!
And if you want more curious things, sometimes reliable, sometimes not, sign up to my newsletter. An easy RT to the 1st tweet of the thread would also motivate me 🙏 Thx!
Generate any image controlling structural integrity ✨ Infinite use cases! Films, 3D, video games, art, interiors, architecture... From cartoon to real, the opposite, or ANYTHING in between!
The VFX team of Here (directed by Robert Zemeckis and starring Robin Wright & Tom Hanks) used Magnific for their FX 🤯
To break it all down (+more), I interviewed VFX supervisor Kevin Baillie! 🧵👇
An incredibly exciting conversation where @kbvfx shares how he got started in the world of VFX, his career journey, what it’s been like working with directors like George Lucas and Robert Zemeckis, and the impact of generative AI in Hollywood plus much more!
So happy to finally be able to share the details!
I've been biting my nails for months but we weren’t allowed to make it public until NOW. Huge thanks to Kevin, finally!
As a co-founder of Magnific, seeing our creation used in a film directed by Robert Zemeckis (Back to the Future, Forrest Gump, etc.) is a dream come true.
We've always known that Magnific is a tool used by professionals (Dior, MrBeast, Adobe, Beeple, etc.), but seeing something this incredible with our own eyes makes it all feel so much more real.
You have no idea how happy this has made me. I don’t think I’ve felt this proud since that one time, by some miracle, I beat Emilio at Age of Empires.
Anyway, I won’t ramble on. Here are the questions Kevin was kind enough to answer, you won’t want to miss them!
Today, I’m going to talk about something we might be able to achieve, though maybe humanity should never even try:
A method for an AI to gain consciousness and reach the status of a superintelligence (ASI).
A theory I’ve been working on for months 🧵
Index – In case you want to jump straight to a section:
0️⃣ Introduction
1️⃣ The foundation of current AI models
2️⃣ What is consciousness?
3️⃣ How to create a self-aware AI?
4️⃣ Singularity / ASI
5️⃣ Moral implications
6️⃣ Risks
0️⃣ Introduction
I’ve been thinking about this idea for a long time, slowly working through its foundations.
Let me start by saying I am NOT a researcher a this is NOT a paper. While I’ve been close to the theory behind foundational AI models, my knowledge has its limits.
The idea I’m about to share is ridiculously simple and it could be VERY wrong.
But what if, against all odds, it really IS as simple as what I’m proposing?
Criticize the idea, not the person: I’d love to hear your thoughts and debate. Thanks!