The Republican Party’s coalition consists of two groups: Those who don’t think that the GOP’s embrace of a politician who wants to execute her political opponents is a dealbreaker - and those who are voting Republican precisely because the party embraces her extremism.
The former group is bigger. But a significant portion of the base is in the latter, and the acute threat to democracy results from the fact that the people in the former camp can’t be bothered to break with a party in which the likes of Marjorie Taylor Greene keep rising.
Let’s keep that in mind on #MLKDay, as Republican politicians will inevitably invoke the legacy of Martin Luther King to call for “civility” and “unity” - with the sole purpose of delegitimizing any critique of racist structures and practices, any demand for equality and respect.
“Unity,” Republicans want America to believe, is not undermined by politicians who propagate violent conspiracy theories; not by reactionary moral panics that relentlessly demonize society’s vulnerable groups; not by legislation stripping citizens of fundamental rights.
Instead, Republicans tell us it is those marginalized groups and their pesky insistence on equal rights, respect, and representation that threatens national “unity” - that it is the reactionary quest to uphold the discriminatory traditional order that’s in line with MLK’s vision.
It’s a reminder that elite calls for “unity” and “civility” almost always constitute attempts to discipline the unruly masses who - how dare they! - demand equality and justice. Ignore the substance of their critique, focus on how “uncivil” and “divisive” it is. An old playbook.
Or put it this way: The version of “MLK” Republicans like to propagate is one that comfortably coexists with also celebrating Robert E. Lee, who betrayed his country to fight for the right to enslave Black people. How is that for “unity” and “civility”?
DeSantis is spearheading the red-state assault on the 1960s civil rights revolution - he has been the most effective champion of a white reactionary counter-mobilization against whatever racial and social progress has been achieved. It does not get any more shameless than this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Debating whether or not Republicans *really* want to erect a cruel regime of merciless white patriarchal dominance is futile. The proof is in the pudding, and the pudding is the state level: Wherever they are in charge, they are embracing an authoritarian vision of society.
We discussed this on today’s episode of @USDemocracyPod: The idea that Republicans are just nihilists who want to burn the system down is not plausible because wherever and whenever they can, they pursue a specific vision to which they are fully committed. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/10-…
Ban abortion, control women; criminalize LGBTQ people.
Install an authoritarian white nationalist education system, ban dissent.
Republican Extremism, MAGA Nihilism, and the Rise of Ron DeSantis
Why it’s misleading to assume the Right is animated purely by nihilistic rage, and why DeSantism will not bring moderation or “normalcy.” podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/10-…
In the end, the insurrectionists finally captured the House: Our takeaways from how the speaker drama played out and what has transpired since, what it all tells us about the Republican Party, and how the rightwing fringe has moved to the center of conservative politics.
Also: Nihilism. Chaos agents. Burning it all down. To many observers, the speaker spectacle confirmed that’s basically all there is to the MAGA Right. @LilyMasonPhD, @perrybaconjr, and I discuss why the “nihilism” interpretation fails to explain what’s happening on the Right.
The state of the conservative discourse. Indistinguishable from what a lefty caricature of rightwing nonsense might look like.
One is a Republican elected official, the other is widely considered one of the Right’s most interesting young thinkers. It’s a real problem.
I mean this sincerely. These specific examples are utterly silly, of course - but the underlying mixture of paranoid siege mentality and opportunistic fueling of rightwing paranoia is extremely dangerous. This isn’t just fringe nonsense - it defines the center of Republicanism.
Of course. Perfect. In the fight against “the Left,” nothing is ever too outlandish, too ridiculous, too bizarre for rightwingers, no level of self-debasement that’s not somehow acceptable. The fact that it will cause real-life harm to their own base? Doesn’t matter. At all.
Exactly two years after an unprecedented, violent assault on democratic self-government, the same anti-democratic, anti-government forces managed to capture the House from within. The insurrectionists finally triumphed.
Did we learn anything new from this outrageous spectacle? Probably not. But it should serve as a crucial reminder of what American democracy is up against, what the GOP has become, and what we must expect from Republicans going forward.
On the second anniversary of an unprecedented, violent assault on democratic self-government, America doesn’t have much time for commemoration or reflection, because the same anti-democratic, anti-government forces are usurping the House from within. It’s terrifying. #January6th
Let it serve as a reminder that the problem is not just Trump, not even primarily Trump: It’s the party that elevated him in the first place, the party that embraces and elevates far-right extremists like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.
The problem is the party that has been completely taken over by the far-right “populist” energies that conservative elites have been fueling for decades, always believing they could harness and control them in their quest to entrench traditional hierarchies, but never succeeding.
A reminder, as we are entering Day 4 of this mess: The new @USDemocracyPod is out, with a deep dive into the Republican chaos in the House - the background, the historical context, the implications for the GOP and the country going forward. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/9-c…
We must now go back to the 1830s to 1850s to find precedent for the number of failed votes. As I said on the pod, this doesn’t mean the situation is *just like* right before the Civil War, as there is no such thing as “just like” in history. But things certainly aren’t great.
We recorded in-between failed vote 3 and 4 - but I believe everything we say very much holds up: How to explain it, what the fault lines are, why it’s misleading to present the #McCarthy camp as “moderates” and only the rebels as “extremists.”