1/3 Russia hasn’t deployed any APFSDS rounds stronger than the 3BM-42 Mango round to Ukraine, this round being made in 1986. It’s understandable as to why they would do this given that Ukraine doesn’t really have anything that the 3BM-42 can’t deal with…
2/3 so it will be interesting to see that with the pledge of CR2’s if the Russians begin to field much larger APFSDS rounds, namely the 3BM-59 Svinets-1 and 3BM-60 Svinets-2 as these have a much longer rod giving them more penetrating power.
3/3 (penetration stats below in extra tweet) The 3BM-42 Mango was originally designed to penetrate early versions of Chobham fitted to the M1 Abrams and CR1.
Penetration stats as follows
3BM-42 Mango fired at 2000m against a 60 degree sloped plate will penetrate 230mm.
3BM-59 Svinets-1 fired at 2000m against a 60 degree sloped plate will penetrate 640mm.
3BM-60 Svinets-2 fired at 2000m against a 60 degree sloped plate will penetrate 600mm.
It’s worth nothing that only the tanks with the 2A46M-4/5 can actually have these rounds fitted as the autoloader size allows it. List below.
T-72B3
T-80BVM
Some T-90A’s
T-90M’s
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Challenger 2 OES thread 1/
The OES Challenger 2, known in military parlance as the Operational Entry Standard (OES) – often synonymous with Theatre Entry Standard (TES) – represents an advanced tier of armoured capability, a step above the baseline vanilla model.
2/ Throughout its deployment in Iraq under Operation TELIC (OP TELIC) from March 2003 to May 2011, the CR2 underwent numerous enhancements in both survivability and lethality. The operational periods in Iraq were segmented into thirteen 6-month rotations, each numerically designated from I to XIII using Roman numerals.
3/ In the challenging landscape of extended Counter Insurgency (COIN) operations, adversaries continuously adapt, creating a dynamic and asymmetric battlefield.
Rodents have long been a problem for infantry in the trenches, but a lesser known fact is the issue of rodents when they embed themselves in armoured fighting vehicles.
2/ Yesterday I shared a post showing a 2S9 Nona with an infestation of mice in the exhaust. Without pest control, rodents can render full battlegroups of tanks and AFV’s inoperable, as experienced by the 22nd Panzer Division during the Soviet Op Uranus, Eastern Front, 1942.
3/ Most of the 22nd Panzer Divisions tanks and AFV’s were parked in dugouts and protected from the frost by the crews laying straw on them. When the tanks were called forward to assist the 3rd Romanian Army delay the Soviet offensive, many tanks could not be started due to rodents chewing the wires, those that could be started had electrical faults, again due to chewed wires and cables. According to numbers only 30 out of 100 vehicles were available. The tanks were Czech produced Pz.38 (t)’s.
The Great Eastern European IFV drought of 2023 thread🧵
The War in Ukraine has led to a drought in IFV’s on both sides, in turn we now see exotic ‘one off’ IFV’s and even some small batch productions, as well as IFV’s upgraded to have more firepower and flexibility.
These are usually based on an APC, the most favourable being the MT-LB, but they’re also seen built on command vehicles and specialist vehicles, with production on both sides lacking in numbers to replace losses, we will continue to see ingenuity in the field of workshop built IFV’s.
This thread will cover the tac markings commonly seen on IDF heavy vehicles.
1.This tac marking is usually on the turret basket at the rear of the vehicle, it consists of Hebrew alphabet characters Aleph(א), Bet(ב), Gimel(ג)or Dalet(ד). The characters indicate the tanks designation within a platoon, the number indicates which platoon, the first image shows Beit(ב) tank belonging to 1st platoon.
2. Company markings are white chevrons on the side skirts, the chevrons directions show which company.
V 1st Coy
> 2nd Coy
^ 3rd Coy
< 4th Coy
The tank pictured (2nd image) belongs to 1st Coy, Beit(ב) tank, 3rd Platoon.
Recognition thread 🧵
23 S-300V vehicles being transported in Russia, we can see this pretty much comprises of multiple systems, all of which are needed to create a functioning S-300V air defence battery. Luckily for you, the S-300V family was added to the app the other day, so here we can use the app to work out some of the variants we can see.
Using the new search function, simply searching S-300V brings up all the vehicles I need.
Firstly, we’ll start with the second vehicle in, which appears to be a 9S19 ‘High Screen’ detection radar, the radar is in lowered in its travel position, but judging by the edges and length of the radar, we can see that it’s a 9S19.
Following on from Object 781, we have the Object 782, which was designed in parallel to the 781.
The Object 782 is again on a modified T-72B hull, similar to the 781 with a raised superstructure, a reworked frontal hull and 2x 40mm grenade launchers in the hull.
The Object 782 is very reminiscent of the BMP-3, given that it shares the same main and secondary armament. The turret consists of a 100mm 2A70 gun, with a coaxial 30mm 2A72 and a coaxial 7.62mm PKT, as well as another 40mm grenade launcher. It had a crew of 7.