I was a a big fan of flight sims in the late DOS-era and I was reminded of one that was quite a hit at the time, Su-27 Flanker by SSI (1995). Anyway, here is a thread on how current Russian views on Ukraine existed well before anyone even knew who Putin was. /1 🧡
SSI was one of the biggest names in PC RPGs, being the company that had the Dungeons & Dragons license for much of the 80s. But it was also arguably the biggest name in wargaming. Su-27 came at a time when hyper-realistic flight sims were having a golden era. /2
SSI was not an established player in the flight sim market, in fact Su-27 was the only such game it ever sold. Lacking in-house flight sim talent, it was outsourced to an external developer, the Moscow-based Eagle Dynamics. This happened to be their first game too. /3
Su-27 game out to generally positive reviews, which praised its realism and accuracy but criticized its somewhat dated graphics and high learning curve: even the cockpit displays were in Russian with no option to switch them to English! /4
Still, it made quite a splash in 1995 particularly since few flight sims at the time let you fly Russian aircraft. It narrowly lost Computer Gaming World's Flight Sim of the Year award in 1996 to EF2000 (which yours truly was a massive fan of). /5
Anyway, 1995 was a time in which lots of videogames and movies had post-Cold War geopolitical rivalry scenarios and Su-27 was no exception. Its battleground was none other than the Crimea peninsula. /6
Now, flight sims back then had MASSIVE manuals, 100s of pages long that described everything from air combat tactics, how the avionics worked, specs of enemy and friendly aircraft, and lengthy historical backgrounds to the game's campaign. Here's the Falcon 4.0 manual: /7
So what was the story behind this game? Let's see from the manual itself. There is no mention of the Ukrainian cultural origins of the Crimea, simply its position as a territory fought by other empires. /8
Then there's the infamous "gift" argument, which again, denies Crimea any historical association with Ukraine. And obviously no mention of the forced resettlements that led to the Russification of the penninsula over time. /9
Then there's a discussion of the status of the "Russian" Black Sea Fleet. Although it was historically created in czarist Russia, the fact is this fleet was based in Ukraine, dependent on Ukrainian servicing, and likely had significant Ukrainian manning during the Soviet era. /10
Now we get a dose of victimization. The evil Ukrainian government abolished the Crimean Republic in 1995, which was formed from the Crimean Autonomous SSR. Not mentioned that it seceded in January 1991, before independence, and voted for Ukrainian independence (54%) too. /11
Here's the game's actual campaign storyline. Sound eerily familiar? Popular referendums for secession? A Russian naval landing to seize airfields? This reads nearly exactly the same as the "little green men" invasion of February 2014, except overtly. /12
The only remotely positive element of this campaign is that at least you could choose to play the Russian or Ukrainian sides (both, after all, fly Su-27s). But it's kind of obvious who they have framed as the villain of the storyline: Ukraine. /13
The point of this thread is to show that Putin isn't the only culprit of this war. Russian society has deeply rooted views of Ukraine being subservient to Russia in every way. These were not ignorant rural vatniks but above-average educated Russian game developers in 1995. /14
As an addendum, Eagle Dynamics continues to exist to this day (its founder Igor Tishin passed away in 2018), though it has since relocated to Switzerland... suspicious? They still to do flight sims, notably the DCS series which includes a Su-27 module. /15
Interestingly, an Eagle Dynamics developer was accused of smuggling F-16 technical information into Russia. Surprise, surprise. /16
Thread ends here. Hope you enjoyed it and, well, if you haven't done so, why not pick up and play a flight sim one day? They are great!βœˆοΈπŸ•ΉοΈ /17
Btw, forgot to mention that Su-27 had a sequel, Su-27 Flanker 2.0 which came out in 1999. I actually did own this one though well after it came out, and I didn't really get into it that much. It also featured the Crimea in a nearly identical campaign. /18
Interestingly, the manual to Flanker 2.0 didn't really describe the hypothetical political tensions that led to the conflict. It was merely combat between Russia and Ukraine and left it at that (the background section was basically copy-pasted from the original). /19
As for DCS, take a guess where the main campaign is? Not Ukraine but a battleground more apt for the late 2000s... Georgia. Ok, now end thread! /20

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Rodrigo Aguilera πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ

Rodrigo Aguilera πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @raguileramx

Jan 17, 2023
We really need to a better job at promoting the use of discretionary median income to judge the prosperity of countries using GDP metrics. Discretionary = income after taxes and also after basic needs (health, education, transport, etc). /1
A significant chunk of US income goes into consuming private services that in other countries don't count as a GDP-measurable transaction because they are public. These usually offset paying higher taxes because public provision is almost always cheaper. /2
The obvious example is healthcare, but also things like requiring a car to travel from your godforsaken suburb (vs taking a bus from an inner city European flat) creates an entire-mini economy that is added to GDP. This gives the illusion that the US is richer. /3
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17, 2023
Latest post is up. Unlike most of my writing this one is a bit personal: I'm done with the left, specifically the online/Western left. Trying to be a part of this community has been nothing but a waste of my time and has carried personal consequences. /1 progressum.substack.com/p/a-breakup-le…
I'm not going to detail the reasons in this thread, read the piece and find out why my disillusionment with this "movement" has become too much. But if you guessed AMLO and Ukraine had something to do with it, you are absolutely right. /2
Aside from a few mutuals I appreciate, over the next couple of days I will likely unfollow most of the accounts who I currently follow in this community and stop commenting on whatever leftist drama de jour happens to be. Honestly don't give a damn anymore. /3
Read 8 tweets
Jan 10, 2023
Feel part of the reluctance to send modern NATO tanks to Ukraine is partly due to the fear that they will be destroyed in an environment that is far more lethal than any war NATO has ever faced. These are Turkish Leopard 2s... in Syria. #Bakhmut #UkraineWar /1 🧡
Every major modern tank war fought by NATO thus far has been against vastly inferior armies, with monkey model Soviet tanks, in large open environments, and with air supremacy. These M1s in Iraq is not going to get ambushed by a guy with an ATGM anytime soon. /2
Tank warfare in Ukraine is brutal. You can be spotted by a UAV and have artillery rain down on you any second. You can be ambushed by an ATGM squad behind any building. You can hit a mine in the rubble. /3
Read 12 tweets
Aug 15, 2022
Surprised at how defense has the advantage in modern mechanized land warfare? You shouldn't be. Almost every technology and tactic being used to today traces its origins to the 1980s AirLand Battle doctrine which was designed to blunt a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. /1
Throughout the Cold War, the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies enjoyed a huge numerical superiority over NATO in both men and equipment. It was widely believed until the 1970s that the Soviets would win a purely conventional war. /2
However, by the 1970s the Soviets achieved nuclear parity with the US. This meant that nuclear war would be impossible to win for either side. NATO realized that it would need to be able to defeat the Warsaw Pact in a conventional war. /3
Read 13 tweets
May 25, 2022
It's been exactly three months since I made the bold claim that Russia was not going to win the war. This was a day and a half after the "special military operation" had begun. I continue to stand by that tweet but this war is far from over. /1 🧡
To be clear, I still believe Ukraine has won, in the sense that Russia's initial objectives of regime change and demilitarization, and the ulterior goal of cultural genocide, are unachievable. Ukraine will remain a sovereign state for the foreseeable future. /2 Image
However, victory can still come at a steep price. As it is, Ukraine still has significant chunks of its territory under Russian occupation and Russia shows no signs of considering any deal that would force them back to their pre-Feb 24 positions. /3 Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 19, 2022
War thoughts: was thinking whether the Russian army was too "tank-heavy" in terms of having way more tanks that it could support relative to the size of its army. There is a case to be made from this chart I just made: #Ukraine️ #UkraineRussianWar #RussianUkrainianWar /1 🧡
Every soldier manning a tank is a soldier not being used for any other element of warfighting. Sure, your armored spearheads might look frightening on paper, but then don't be surprised if they get bogged down quickly and are poorly coordinated. /2
Big Tank Armies have always been a Soviet/Warsaw Pact fetish. At a time in which anti-tank defenses were not nearly as good (1950s and 60s), they would have indeed been a formidable foe against NATO's tank-inferior armies (both quantitatively and also qualitatively) /3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(