MarkHertling Profile picture
Jan 19 10 tweets 5 min read
The next US aid package to Ukraine will be announced Friday.

Reports suggest that package includes a large number of Stryker Fighting Vehicles & more Bradleys.

I'm pretty familiar with the Strykers. This is a terrific. 1/10

washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
In 2000, I was commanding 3/2 Armored Brigade (Arrowhead!), when I received new orders to be prepared to field a new organization with new equipment.

Our Brigade would become the 1st Interim Brigade Combat Team (IBCT), then later the Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) 2/
While the Abrams tank is named for GEN Creighton Abrams (hero of the Battle of the Bulge), and the Bradley is name after GEN Omar Bradley, the Stryker is named after two Medal of Honor winners - PFC Stuart Stryker (World War II) & SPC4 Robert Stryker (Vietnam) 3/
GEN Shinseki, a personal hero & one of my mentors, drove the fielding (that's him in a suit in this picture).

His idea: have an air deployable unit that generated great battlefield intelligence w/ vehicles that could bring lots of infantryman to the fight..quickly & quietly.4/
Influencing a bunch of tankers to give up their Abrams for a lightly armored "infantry bus" was tough.But they soon learned the power of intel-driven operations.

The Stryker proved their value in combat in Iraq & Afghanistan with even Special Operators wanting these vehicles. 5/
THEY ARE NOT A TANK!

They are lightly armored, and have either a .50 cal machine gun, a grenade launcher, or a 30mm cannon (w a lot of guys in back).

They are quick & quiet.

Our Division had a Brigade of Strykers in Iraq, they performed extremely well. 6/
There is also a Stryker with a 105mm gun (smaller and less powerful than an Abrams or Leopard 120mm).It's good infantry support.

The cannon has had some problems & I'm not sure if the Mobile Gun System (MGS or AGS) will be part of the package to Ukraine. We'll see. 7/
The wheels of the Stryker are better than tracked vehicles for roads;the down side is they get stuck...a lot. They're usually much easier to recover out of mud than a stuck tank.

Soldiers say they are easier to maintain, fix & keep running...& they use much less fuel.8/
The Friday package will likely include more Bradleys, which have more armor, a stronger gun & anti-tank missiles (TOWs).

Ukrainians are training now at Grafenwoehr & Hohenfels, Germany (@7thATC)

See my piece in @BulwarkOnline

thebulwark.com/what-bradley-f… 9/
A combination of these vehicles, HIMARS, M777, & additional T-72 (or other tanks) in the hands of a trained Ukrainian army will make a HUGE difference for offensive operations.

Looking forward to hearing confirmation...and news of what other @nato nations are providing. 10/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MarkHertling

MarkHertling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHertling

Jan 16
Military theorists & historians have –in my view, incorrectly- concluded there are 2 types of strategy.
One is annihilation & the other is attrition (or exhaustion).
While these aren’t the *only* strategies, it's helpful to understand them to comprehend Ukraine right now.1/11
A strategy of ANNIHILATION suggests a nation can defeat its enemy by forcing a decision (or series of decisions) by using overwhelming maneuver, effective political & military leadership, and combined actions (like offensive operations, alliances, economics , information, etc).2/
Through history, “battles of annihilation” occurred when a military force is surrounded & defeated & an army is forced to surrender. As a result, the nation no longer resists because it lost its force. (Note: a battle of annihilation isn’t a strategy of annihilation).3/
Read 11 tweets
Jan 12
.@RadioFreeTom nails it again. Yes, it was a big mistake and there must be an investigation & accountability & the govt ought find ways to prevent in the future. But mistakes differ from purposeful actions, lack of remorse, excuses for lying and refusal to return when caught.1/2
I’m going to bet the inquiry into the ones found with @POTUS may show some systemic problems w/ SSO handling as well. That can be fixed. Just admittedly taking govt docs and refusing to return needs to be addressed in a different way.2/2
As a commander, I dealt with improper handling of classified material on numerous occasions. All were investigated. The findings found a range of issues, and punishment also ranged from admonishment to admin action to courts martial. We also learned lessons on fixing processes.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10
So, I put this information out and 2/3rds if responses are “why didn’t we start giving them this equipment and training them on it earlier?
For those asking those questions, let me reply with a few of my own that might help people consider the implications. 1/9
-How many Ukrainians do you think need training for these kind of operations?
-How many US servicemen will be needed to train them?
-On what specific pieces of equipment?
-since the US doesn’t have warehouses unused military equipment ready to give away, where do we get it? 2/
-What US taxpayer dollars have been allocated for building Ukraine an entire army filled with modern equipment?
-if we take the needed equipment from US military units, what risks are we taking in US national security around the globe? 3/
Read 10 tweets
Jan 4
While Americans are focused on the House & the the election of a Speaker, Ukraine continues to fight.

And the US & @NATO cotinues to look for *viable* solutions for equipping & supporting Ukraine on the battlefield.

Many rumors the last few days. What might happen? A 🧵 1/11
A few days ago, @bloomberg was 1st to report possibility of US sending Bradley Fighting Vehicles to Ukraine.

IMO, this is a a great idea...something I support wholeheartedly!

Why?

As I said a few days ago, I was a Brad Commander in Desert Storm. 2/

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The Brad (or IFV/CFV) is NOT a tank, but it can be a tank killer...and a troop carrier. (IFV=Infantry Fighting Vehicle, CFV=Cavalry Fighting Vehicle).

On the Turret: 2 TOW anti-tank missiles, 25mm Bushmaster chain gun, 7.62 co-axial machinegun, all effective at long ranges. 3/
Read 11 tweets
Dec 30, 2022
The wonderful @PamelaBrownCNN was about to ask me about this @washingtonpost article, but I think she ran out of time on @CNN tonight.

But I'd like to talk about it because it talks more than just about the "weapons" the west is providing...it's about training for combat.1/9
Most readers will marvel at the tactics & maneuvers UKRs army and its generals used in the east (Donbas) & the southeast (Kherson) during their Oct/Nov operations.

But there's so much more to be gleaned from this article.

It speaks to the transformation of UKR's Army. 2/
If you've read the piece, read it again with a different view.

UKR generals conducting "rehearsals" (in Germany) with US officials.

Our Army calls those "ROC Drills" for "rehearsal of concept." That's a commander/staff drill to coordinate & synchronize actions in combat. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Dec 10, 2022
Today, I RT this @WSJ article on logistics challenges w/in Ukraine.

It generated a bunch of "but what about..." from many who may not understand what goes into decisions related to delivering weapons to allies/partners.

So here's a 🧵on that. 1/
wsj.com/articles/many-…
The @DeptofDefense is focused on planning & analysis as an organization for decision-making.

Each decision is based on a variety of practical & national security considerations.

As citizens concerned primarily about our own national security, we expect nothing less. 2/ Image
When an ally or partner (like Ukraine) requests support - weapons, ammunition, military manpower, etc - there are no rash decisions.

The requests are analyzed, weighed against multiple factors, assessed, and then military & civilians make recommendations to the @SecDef. 3/ Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(