So much nonsense on twitter about the Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bomb (GLSDB)...
Ok, a thread 🧵
GLSDB uses a Lockheed Martin M26 MLRS rocket section with a Boeing GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bomb. 1/n
The M26 was the original rocket used with the M270 to deliver cluster munitions. M26 rockets are being dismantled, which means lots of M26 rocket sections are available.
M26 rockets come in pods of six. Pods that are filled with rockets at Lockheed Martin's plant in Arkansas. 2/n
The GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bomb is made by Boeing. It is an INS/GPS guided glide bomb.
Each BRU-61/A Bomb Rack Unit carries four GBU-39/B (or GBU-39A/B, GBU-39B/B).
Almost all NATO fighters and bombers can deploy GBU-39/B. 3/n
Once released the bombs deploys wings and glide (!) to their target. Glide means the bombs are slow when compared to missiles.
And they are INS/GPS guided bombs, which means they can only (!) hit stationary targets.
And have a good look at the GBU-39/B's steel nose cone. 4/n
Lots of people are tweeting that the GLSDB can hit "moving targets"... yes, but only if you mate the M26 rocket section with a Boeing GBU-39B/B Laser Small Diameter Bomb (LSDB), which has a totally different nose cone, because you have to attach a laser seeker to the bomb. 5/n
Here is a photo of a GBU-39B/B after being released from a AC-130J Ghostrider.
GBU-39B/B are absolutely useless for Ukraine. They are laser-guided SDBs: meaning there needs to be a plane or drone lasering the (moving) target, which means you have a Ukrainian aircraft flying 6/n
at the ideal height for and within range of russian air defense systems.
Forget all the tweets about "moving targets" and "accuracy of 1 meter" - because those specs are for the GBU-39B/B, which Ukraine can't use.
Likewise there is no home-on-jam (HOJ) SDB version.
7/n
HOJ SDB are still in development. They would be used to autonomously strike jamming and radar systems, as does the AGM-88 HARM already given to Ukraine.
And now to the GBU-53/B, which is something different entirely. 8/n
The GBU-53/B or Stormbreaker or Small Diameter Bomb Increment II (SDB II) is made by Raytheon and uses GPS/INS guidance plus either a millimeter wave active radar homing or semi-active laser guidance or infrared homing seeker.
It's a completely new weapon system. 9/n
GBU-53/Bs are also way more expensive than GBU-39/B.
And as said before they are manufactured by Raytheon, while the GBU-39/B is made by Boeing, and the M26 rocket sections are made by Lockheed Martin, and the GLSDB was developed by Saab/Boeing. 10/n
What Ukraine will get are GPS/INS guided GBU-39/B on M26 rocket sections, which carry less explosive than a GMLRS M31 rocket and without the added punch of a supersonic GMLRS missile slamming into a target.
Last but not least GLSDB isn't even in production... so before they can show up in Ukraine GLSDB has to enter production.
M26 rocket sections exist, GBU-39/B bombs exist - but the interstage connectors to mate these two need to be built. And the resulting rockets have to be
12/n
sent to Camden in Arkansas, where Lockheed Martin will mount them into M270/M142 HIMARS pods.
Yes, the GLSDB is a great weapon and will help Ukraine. But it will take some time to arrive and people need to stop mixing up GBU-39/B specs with GBU-39B/B and GBU-53/B specs. 13/n
Last but not least: the GBU-39A/B Focused Lethality Munition is a GBU-39/B variant with a carbon-fiber casing for ultra low fragmentation and a DIME explosive for a more focused-blast - both are used to reduce collateral damage.
Ukraine won't get it and doesn't need it.
14/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gripen fans continue to spam my mention with claims how fantastic Sweden's Bas 90 and Gripen combination is... and that it would work for Canada's North too...
Ok, let's quickly compare Canada's three northern territories (Yukon, Northwest, Nunavut) and Sweden... ... 1/6
Land area:
🇸🇪 450,295 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
🇨🇦 terr.: 3,593,589 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
The land area of just the three territories (without Canada's 10 provinces) is already 8 times bigger than all of Sweden...
(In total Canada's land area is 9,984,670 km2
2/6
(3,855,100 sq mi) or 22 times Sweden).
Population:
🇸🇪 10.61 million
🇨🇦 terr.: 0.13 million
Sweden's population is 81.6 times bigger than that of the three territories... and if you look at population density:
🇸🇪 23,6/km2
🇨🇦 terr.: 0,013/km2
3/6
Saab loooves to tout the claim that the Gripen can "operate from dispersed air bases".
They do that, because they know no one of you knows what it means. And every time I see someone regurgite "dispersed air bases" (or "road runways" or "short runways") I know I am dealing
1/36
with someone, who knows absolutely nothing about the topic.
So allow me to take you on a deep dive into what "operating from dispersed air bases" actually means.
Let's start with Såtenäs Air Base in Southern Sweden - the most important Swedish air base. 2/n
When the Viggen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen E entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
In the 1950s Sweden developed the Bas 60 system, which would have dispersed the Swedish 3/n
The 11th Airborne Division is the least likely to be used to invade #Greenland.
The division's deputy commander is Canadian. He is responsible for Operations. The 11th would have to arrest part of their own officers, before being able to plan a Greenland invasion.
Also
1/6
there are just 8 C-17 Globemaster aircraft at Elmendorf Air Force Base. The USAF would need to fly a dozen more up to Alaska, which of course Canada would notice. Then to reach Greenland the C-17 would have to cross Canada's North, which NORAD's Canadian officers would report
2/6
to the Canadian and Danish governments.
It is much more likely the US will inform allies that a brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg will fly to the Middle East, which means the air route will take them right over Greenland. And at Fort Bragg you also have the
3/6
This is a typical clown tweet by someone, who knows nothing about WWII.
3 years before D-Day, the Soviets & nazis were in a love-feast, while the US had not entered the war; & when it did it had to cross an ocean full of nazi submarines to stage troops & materiel for D-Day.
1/14
And unlike the warmongering Soviets, which in June 1941 fielded 304 divisions, the US Army fielded just 37 divisions when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor (+ two Marine Corps divisions).
Before any D-Day the US Army had to start forming new divisions (38 in 1942 and 17 in 1943) &
2/n
then ship those divisions across the Atlantic, which was teeming with German subs, while the Soviets just used trains to bring troops and materiel to the front (& if the Soviet had had to ship troops across an ocean, they would have just accepted that a third of their troops
3/n
The @RoyalAirForce - once the strongest air force in Western Europe... but now...
7 Eurofighter Typhoon squadrons are expected to fulfill the tasks, for which 35 years ago the RAF fielded 40 squadrons (31 active & 4 reserve + 5 shadow squadrons, which would have been formed
1/27
from the personnel & fighters of the RAF's operational conversion units).
At the end of the Cold War these 40 squadrons were assigned to 4 commands, each with a specific mission & enough aircraft to fulfill their mission.
No. 1 Group was tasked with striking Soviet forces
2/27
in Northern Germany, including with WE.177 tactical nukes.
The Group fielded 8 active, 4 reserve and 2 shadow squadrons, which flew Tornado GR1, Jaguar GR1A, and Harrier GR5 fighters (the reserve squadrons flew Hawk T1A). The group also included the RAF's 3 aerial
3/27
Since there are still people claiming the Gripen is the "ideal fighter for Canada"... here are the refueling stops the Gripen C/D needed to get from Ronneby in Sweden to Eielson Air Base in Alaska.
So of course this is an "ideal fighter" for Canada... as it will have to stop 1/5
at every Canadian airfield to refuel...
For the curious ones:
On 13 July 2006 five Gripen C and two Gripen D left
their base in Ronneby Sweden. They refueled at RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland, then flew to NAS Keflavik in Iceland, where they refueled and stayed overnight.
2/5
On 14 July the Gripens flew to Sondre Stromfjord in Greenland for another refueling, then proceeded to RCAF Iqualuit in Canada for refueling and the night.
On 15 July the Gripens flew to Churchill, refuelled and then flew to RCAF Cold Lake, where they spent 16 July to rest.
3/5