So much nonsense on twitter about the Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bomb (GLSDB)...
Ok, a thread 🧵
GLSDB uses a Lockheed Martin M26 MLRS rocket section with a Boeing GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bomb. 1/n
The M26 was the original rocket used with the M270 to deliver cluster munitions. M26 rockets are being dismantled, which means lots of M26 rocket sections are available.
M26 rockets come in pods of six. Pods that are filled with rockets at Lockheed Martin's plant in Arkansas. 2/n
The GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bomb is made by Boeing. It is an INS/GPS guided glide bomb.
Each BRU-61/A Bomb Rack Unit carries four GBU-39/B (or GBU-39A/B, GBU-39B/B).
Almost all NATO fighters and bombers can deploy GBU-39/B. 3/n
Once released the bombs deploys wings and glide (!) to their target. Glide means the bombs are slow when compared to missiles.
And they are INS/GPS guided bombs, which means they can only (!) hit stationary targets.
And have a good look at the GBU-39/B's steel nose cone. 4/n
Lots of people are tweeting that the GLSDB can hit "moving targets"... yes, but only if you mate the M26 rocket section with a Boeing GBU-39B/B Laser Small Diameter Bomb (LSDB), which has a totally different nose cone, because you have to attach a laser seeker to the bomb. 5/n
Here is a photo of a GBU-39B/B after being released from a AC-130J Ghostrider.
GBU-39B/B are absolutely useless for Ukraine. They are laser-guided SDBs: meaning there needs to be a plane or drone lasering the (moving) target, which means you have a Ukrainian aircraft flying 6/n
at the ideal height for and within range of russian air defense systems.
Forget all the tweets about "moving targets" and "accuracy of 1 meter" - because those specs are for the GBU-39B/B, which Ukraine can't use.
Likewise there is no home-on-jam (HOJ) SDB version.
7/n
HOJ SDB are still in development. They would be used to autonomously strike jamming and radar systems, as does the AGM-88 HARM already given to Ukraine.
And now to the GBU-53/B, which is something different entirely. 8/n
The GBU-53/B or Stormbreaker or Small Diameter Bomb Increment II (SDB II) is made by Raytheon and uses GPS/INS guidance plus either a millimeter wave active radar homing or semi-active laser guidance or infrared homing seeker.
It's a completely new weapon system. 9/n
GBU-53/Bs are also way more expensive than GBU-39/B.
And as said before they are manufactured by Raytheon, while the GBU-39/B is made by Boeing, and the M26 rocket sections are made by Lockheed Martin, and the GLSDB was developed by Saab/Boeing. 10/n
What Ukraine will get are GPS/INS guided GBU-39/B on M26 rocket sections, which carry less explosive than a GMLRS M31 rocket and without the added punch of a supersonic GMLRS missile slamming into a target.
Last but not least GLSDB isn't even in production... so before they can show up in Ukraine GLSDB has to enter production.
M26 rocket sections exist, GBU-39/B bombs exist - but the interstage connectors to mate these two need to be built. And the resulting rockets have to be
12/n
sent to Camden in Arkansas, where Lockheed Martin will mount them into M270/M142 HIMARS pods.
Yes, the GLSDB is a great weapon and will help Ukraine. But it will take some time to arrive and people need to stop mixing up GBU-39/B specs with GBU-39B/B and GBU-53/B specs. 13/n
Last but not least: the GBU-39A/B Focused Lethality Munition is a GBU-39/B variant with a carbon-fiber casing for ultra low fragmentation and a DIME explosive for a more focused-blast - both are used to reduce collateral damage.
Ukraine won't get it and doesn't need it.
14/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And this is how Berlin would look like 3 days after putin attacks Europe... because Germany doesn't have the air defence ammo to defend any of its city for more than 2 days.
1/12
This is Copenhagen.
And this is how Copenhagen would look like the morning after putin attacks Europe... because Denmark doesn't have any air defence to defend itself.
2/12
This is Paris.
And this is how Paris would look like a day after putin attacks Europe... because France only has SAMP/T air defence systems, which is as of now has very limited capabilities against ballistic missiles.
3/12
Are the American M142 HIMARS and the M270A2 MLRS the best rocket/missile launchers... yes, they are.
Should Europe buy them? No.
Not as long as @LockheedMartin doesn't have a production line IN EUROPE for GMLRS, GMLRS-ER, ATACMS and PrSM missiles... but as long as Europe 1/9
is ordering only itsy-bitsy amounts of missiles, there is no incentive for Lockheed Martin to produce missiles in Europe... which means at any given moment MAGA can deny Europe the needed missiles to defend itself against a russian attack.
So... Europe can either order 10,000
2/n
missiles per year,... or have a look at the second best rocket/missile launcher: Israel's PULS.
Should Europe buy it? No.
Because the missile production line in Israel is too small to support Europe's missile needs... again, Europe would have to either commit to buy 10,000 3/n
Let's run some numbers on Ukraine's brilliant operation to take out russia's strategic aviation deep in russia and Siberia.
8× containers are visible in this image
As Ukraine sent 2× containers to each of the 5× air bases they attacked, another 2× must be out of sight. 1/6
Each container roof seems to have housed 9 compartments. Here we can see that at 3× per compartments, but they might have even had space for 4× drones.
Quick math: that's 27× or 36× drones.
Two containers per air base: 54× or 72× drones
But (!) not all compartments likely 2/6
held drones.
As we saw in this video from on of the containers launching drones, the roof of the containers slid to the side and fell down... so one compartment might have housed the motor and system to slide the roof off.
Also all the containers self-destructed once they 3/6
Italy's 61º Stormo received enough of the new T-345A basic jet trainers to begin pilot training this June.
As everyone knows, I am all for growing European militaries and adding capabilities... but why does EVERYTHING have to be with US engines?
Europe must stop buying US
1/22
made kit, components and weapon systems.
The Italian T-345A (left) and the Czech L-39 Skyfox (right) are the only two basic jet trainers currently in production in Europe... and both use a Williams International FJ44-4M turbofan made in Ogden, Utah.
Yes, there are more 2/n
American components than just the engines in both, but as aircraft are designed around their engines Europe needs to stop buying American and start building engines again.
Both planes the T-345A and L-39 Skyfox replace used European engines: the Italian MB-339 (pic) 3/n
To my American followers: it is time to plan for exile.
Doesn't mean you will have to leave, but based on experiences of Jews fleeing Nazi Germany after 1933 here are a few things to make escape and exile easier:
1) get an up to date passport (the regime might no issue you
1/12
one in the future thus stranding you) 2) if possible get a passport from another nation. It doesn't matter which; just get a passport the regime can't cancel. 3) open bank accounts in a foreign nation (I can't stress this enough! The regime will freeze your American accounts,
2/n
which will prevent you i.e. from booking a flight; and you will arrive in another nation penniless if you do not shift your funds into a non-American bank in a non-American nation ASAP) 4) plan for the regime putting you on a no-fly list. How can you get to the border and to
3/n