It's nasty to attack my company and DW+ hosts as "Big Con" by lying about the meaning of a non-binding term sheet. It’s despicable to plan weeks in advance to attack my best friend (and your friend!) by setting up and secretly taping a phone call, all to grow your email list.
Here is the timeline.
Prior to October 5: Steven's agent requests we send an offer.
October 5: We submit a non-binding term sheet.
November 2: Steven tells Jeremy he wants $30M per year and us to send him a new offer, refusing to red-line the term sheet.
~November 14: We told Steven we couldn't do that.
December 12: Steven apparently registers StopBigCon.com, knowing he’s leaving the Blaze, and that we haven’t provided him an offer to his liking. Steven needed a plan. Attacking us was the plan.
December 15: Steven announces he’s leaving The Blaze.
January 7: Steven texts Jeremy in friendly fashion to ask if they can talk.
January 9: Steven calls Jeremy and secretly tapes him.
This means 96 days elapsed between when he received the term sheet and when he secretly taped Jeremy. And it means that 36 days elapsed between when he decided to attack Daily Wire and Jeremy by purchasing StopBigCon and when he called Jeremy to tape him.
Gross.
Once more, if you actually care about the supposedly horrific non-binding first offer term sheet offering $50M/4 years, Jeremy reads it line-by-line here.
It is quite simple. If your show loses money, you lose money. This is how capitalism works.
You know who knows this? Steven Crowder. That's why he has a "Piss Off YouTube" segment in which he deliberately does not say things that will get him kicked off YouTube, and directs people behind his paywall. He must be a shill for YouTube or something.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prince Harry's memoir is obviously self-serving and narcissistic; most memoirs are. What makes his memoir truly culturally seminal is the way in which it exposes the overt transformation of the goal of the Western leadership class from service to self-service.
Harry is almost the Platonic ideal of the modern man: a beneficiary of a historic institution who decides that true heroism lies in destroying those institutions, all in the name of personal fulfillment. The end of his book is literally this: "You’re free. Fly away."
Contrast that with Queen Elizabeth's statement in 1947 on her 21st birthday:
This is the first sentence of the book that made him famous, "The Population Bomb" (1968): "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now."
That book sold 3 million copies and became the best-selling environmental propaganda work of all time.
I regret to inform you that “Glass Onion” is actively bad. I will discuss first the actual writing of the movie followed by the politics of it. Both suck. SPOILERS follow.
First, the writing. The first half of the movie is a complete misdirect and a waste of time.
We only find out about the actual murder we’re supposed to investigate full one hour and ten minutes into the film, as well as an entirely new backstory (Miles never invited Blanc, and Andi has a twin sister masquerading as her). We’re actively deceived by the writer.
We should all be enraged that we were told lies about the COVID vaccine. Today, I spoke with @RWMaloneMD about both of our decisions to take the vax, our govt’s gaslighting & propaganda campaign, and what happened when Malone tried to alert the FDA & Pelosi to data flaws. THREAD:
The corrupt hijacking of The Science™ by politicians has left the public unsure of what to believe or whom to trust. Malone explains that if it comes packaged in an electric fence of gaslighting, deplatforming, and ad hominem attacks, it’s likely propaganda, not science. 2/4
At first, Malone assumed the FDA had been "hoodwinked" by Pfizer, but he now believes the FDA was part of the propaganda machine from the beginning of the pandemic, and that their gross mismanagement & outright gaslighting has resulted in skepticism of *all* vaccines. 3/4
Zelensky is not wrong to seek more American aid; it's in the interest of his country. The United States is not wrong to provide aid; defeating Russia's invasion is in the interest of our country. But this does not mean that the Ukrainian and US goals here are identical...
Ukraine is singularly interested in pushing Russia completely out of Ukraine, including Crimea; we are interested in upholding NATO deterrence, preventing Russian escalation, standing back China, and yes, preventing Russia's absolute collapse.
We have achieved most of our goals; Ukraine has not achieved its goals yet. This means we are eager to bring Russia to the table, where Ukraine is less eager. Ukraine has no incentive to end the war short of absolute Russian surrender.