Contrary to what you have been told, rotational Kinematics effects weather in a process called the Coriolis Effect.
In Earth Science, Geography, Meteorology, Physical Geography, Physics it's defined by angular acceleration.
Al Gores book "OUR CHOICE" is s**t science from cover to cover.
In fact, most of what you need to know about the climate comes from the Coriolis Effect.
Would it surprise you that this effect is largely ignored in climate science.
AGW is just a very bad theory. #ClimateScam
The heart of #ClimateScam debate is the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) which refers to a steady-state response of global surface temperature to the modeled long-wave radiative forcing (RF) in a doubling of CO2 concentration assumed from pre-industrial level of 280 ppm.
According to climate models based on the Greenhouse theory, an increase of CO2 from 280 ppm to 560 ppm will produce a net radiative forcing (RF) as radiant-heat trapping of 3.74 W m-2 - Gregory et al. 2004
So global surface warming between 2.5 K and 4.0 K - IPCC AR6. #ClimateScam
The IPCC Assessment Reports all fail to discuss global temperature sensitivities to changes in cloud albedo, absorbed solar radiation or total surface atmospheric pressure. #ClimateScam
The equations derived or proposed to calculate sensitivities & are missing & variations of cloud albedo are viewed in modern #ClimateScam science as an internal feedback in climatic change induced by external forcing like increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions. - (Arrhenius 1896)
Most of the observed warming during the 20th Century is attributed to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations & believed to trap outgoing long-wave radiation in the Earth’s troposphere which reduces the rate of surface infrared cooling to Space. #ClimateScam
Many published studies over the last 15 years have shown through both satellite & surface observations that the absorption of solar radiation by the Earth-atmosphere has increased significantly since 1982 due to a decreased cloud cover/albedo or “global brightening”.
So the #ClimateScam here is that warming due to an increased “radiative forcing” from greenhouse gases is a model calculation & not a direct measurement, but the increased absorption of solar energy by the Earth’s climate system is a direct observation.
The model calculation is a way of fooling fools with Science-E sounding assumptions.
The quantify the climate sensitivity is not observed due to albedo variations independent to the assumed greenhouse forcing & errors greater than the difference in the measurement.
In conclusion, Earth’s ECS to shortwave solar radiation is different from the hypothesized ECS to CO2.
Modeling is hypothesized nonsense & TOA solar irradiance, planetary albedo, & total atmospheric pressure are the keys to understanding Equilibrium Climate Sensitivities.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A scientist needs to be above the bickering of peer review battels. While useful as arguments, peer review is a very weak system that favors populist ideas & thus only publishes shiny things.
Those who believe in study X are mistakenly overconfident & miss sources & methods.
Every real physicist (scientist) ignores the conclusion in every study & immediately looks at Sources & Methodology. That is where you find the value for the conclusions.
If you want to think like a scientist, this is how you start. We ignore alarmist websites & MSM fanfare.
Another part of being a "real scientist" is to avoid being involved with propaganda & activism (a mental disorder that conflates science with politics).
Scientists, should be skeptical in nature. They don't accept anything, especially when it violates the known laws of physics.
Why did Microsoft founder Bill Gates step down in February 2000 as chief executive of Microsoft?
For allegedly violating The Sherman Antitrust Act antitrust law as a settlement in the DoJ & attorneys general of 20 different states who filed antitrust charges against Microsoft.
In Redmond just before he left I heard the first hand stories about some of the other things that were going on at Microsoft.
Although a talented programmer, DOS was actually written by a 22-year old Tim Paterson. Not Bill.
Gates co-founder of Microsoft, Paul Allen (1953-2018), wrote in his memoirs that Bill Gates is a ruthless schemer who demeaned his employees & conspired to rip off his business partner.
I didn't know Gates, but a close friend did & avoided both Gates & Jobs for years.
60 Minutes: When you heard president Biden's goal of commercial fusion power within a decade? You thought what?
Mathematician Charles Seife's response was similar to my own.
"I thought it was nonsense".
10:30
The pursuit of Fusion Power is a pipe dream!
You can't overstate the significance of the Ignition achievement.
"Enough excess energy to boil two pots of coffee!"
Essentially, proving that Fusion power is the most significantly impractical way to create energy.
No doubt by 2050 it will impress us by boiling more water.
Think about the significance of being able to boil two pots of water after spending 4 times the cost of a single inefficient nuclear reactor.
"Green energy" will always be outside our reach, so long as we continue to fund nonsense & bad scientific investments.