#Zahawi update: his lawyers have written to me, denying that HMRC investigated him under COP 9, the procedure for investigating fraud. Since they are in such a helpful mood, I'm optimistic they'll answer some further questions. Full correspondence below:
My email:
The Osborne Clarke reply:
And my response:
I have updated my list of Zahawi questions to reflect the COP 9 answer.
Obvious addition: anyone thinking of sending abusive messages to Ashley should ask themselves some pretty fundamental questions.
I publish Ashley’s name because I believe lawyers engaging in SLAPP should be accountable, to the public and to their other clients.
A response from Zahawi's lawyer:
The last time Ashley suggested I contact Zahawi's press officer, it did not go well:
But I am hopeful this time is different, so:
You can bookmark this thread to catch the reply.
But I probably wouldn't bother.
I'm delighted to say I received a response to my questions. The response says that Mr Zahawi is not going to answer any questions:
Big development on our July storyabout a dodgy tax relief claim by Dundee United and tax firm ZLX.
The club made a huge claim for R&D tax relief which said that 24% of the players' time, and 80% of the chef's time, was spent on "research and development".
Not credible.
ZLX denied the document had been sent to HMRC (but then why was it prepared and signed?).
Dundee United's FD denied signing it. But his electronic signature was on it.
Who benefits from the abolition of stamp duty land tax?
The first answer: people buying very expensive homes. Average saving for someone buying a £10m+ home is £1.7m. Average saving for someone buying a £250k-£500k home is £5k.
The second, truer, answer: people who currently own very expensive homes.
The evidence is that stamp duty is economically paid by sellers - it reduces property prices.
Lots of people asking about the Government's prospects for recovering the £120m from Barrowman/Mone/their companies
Short answer: I don't know. I'm not an insolvency specialist. No clue how the £120m was paid out to them from PPE Medpro
So I have no technical answer
But...
(The background: PPE Medpro itself is in administration, with almost no cash to its name. So no money is coming from it - and the question is whether the Government can pursue the money elsewhere.)
This is the confidential settlement offer Barrowman/Mone made to the Government, offering to settle the litigation for £23m.
(We'd never normally see this, but for unfathomable reasons, Mone posted it on X.)