#Zahawi update: his lawyers have written to me, denying that HMRC investigated him under COP 9, the procedure for investigating fraud. Since they are in such a helpful mood, I'm optimistic they'll answer some further questions. Full correspondence below:
My email:
The Osborne Clarke reply:
And my response:
I have updated my list of Zahawi questions to reflect the COP 9 answer.
Obvious addition: anyone thinking of sending abusive messages to Ashley should ask themselves some pretty fundamental questions.
I publish Ashley’s name because I believe lawyers engaging in SLAPP should be accountable, to the public and to their other clients.
A response from Zahawi's lawyer:
The last time Ashley suggested I contact Zahawi's press officer, it did not go well:
But I am hopeful this time is different, so:
You can bookmark this thread to catch the reply.
But I probably wouldn't bother.
I'm delighted to say I received a response to my questions. The response says that Mr Zahawi is not going to answer any questions:
Before we bask too luxuriously in the majesty of democracy, here's new evidence (thanks to @wethinkpolling) that half the public doesn't understand income tax.
Half of voters believe that, once you hit the higher rate threshold, the 40% higher rate applies to all your earnings. Our report, with full polling data is here. taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/07/05/hal…
Paul Baxendale-Walker is the former barrister and solicitor who helped create the "loan schemes" that cost the country £billions and caused misery for tens of thousands of people.
HMRC did it again. Missed a deadline on an important avoidance case. The result: HMRC's entire case struck out.
Got to wonder if something is seriously wrong.
This time the deadline wasn't in the slightest bit complicated. The judge set the deadline in writing, and it was an "unless order", i.e. if you fail to comply, you get struck out
HMRC applied for, and was granted, an extension til 17 June: