#Zahawi update: his lawyers have written to me, denying that HMRC investigated him under COP 9, the procedure for investigating fraud. Since they are in such a helpful mood, I'm optimistic they'll answer some further questions. Full correspondence below:
My email:
The Osborne Clarke reply:
And my response:
I have updated my list of Zahawi questions to reflect the COP 9 answer.
Obvious addition: anyone thinking of sending abusive messages to Ashley should ask themselves some pretty fundamental questions.
I publish Ashley’s name because I believe lawyers engaging in SLAPP should be accountable, to the public and to their other clients.
A response from Zahawi's lawyer:
The last time Ashley suggested I contact Zahawi's press officer, it did not go well:
But I am hopeful this time is different, so:
You can bookmark this thread to catch the reply.
But I probably wouldn't bother.
I'm delighted to say I received a response to my questions. The response says that Mr Zahawi is not going to answer any questions:
A 'tax adviser' pushing smears seeded by Russian disinformation - cocaine, rent-boys, the lot - to flog a Gibraltar "zero-tax" company that in reality lands clients with big HMRC bills and penalties.
The strangest tax scam we’ve uncovered. Thread 👇
Of if you want to go straight to our full report, with complete documents and links/references: taxpolicy.org.uk/offshore-advis…
Offshore Advisory Group (OAG) publish a large number of posts on LinkedIn and on their website with titles like “Starmer’s Communist State“ and “Tax without consent and representation is theft“.
To compare wage taxes apples-to-apples, the OECD invented the tax wedge: the share of total labour cost taken by income tax plus employee & employer NI (social security).
Here’s the 2024 league table for a single worker - spot where the UK sits 👇
Zia Yusuf has published a response to our report on the Reform UK "Britannia card" proposal. It's disappointing: heavy on insults, light on substance, and revealing that Mr Yusuf cites an OBR paper he hasn't read.
I won't respond to the insults, but people who have actual arguments don't need to accuse people of writing "drivel" and being "outlandishly stupid". This is playground stuff.
(And calling me "far left" is pretty silly when I've just come off a discussion with the Institute of Economic Affairs in which I and the IEA agree on almost all the big tax policy questions. But never mind. )insider.iea.org.uk/p/tax-expert-d…
A few people have asked for a shorter summary of our piece on the Reform UK "Britannia card" proposal.
We've also updated our report with a full copy of the Reform UK paper. Quick thread:
Reform UK have fallen into the trap of forgetting there are many different types of "non-doms":
1. High net worth people who are abroad (or planning to leave) but could be enticed to come here for a £250k Britannia card.
Problem is: HNWs won't believe the card will stay long term given the MANY recent non-dom changes. So no private wealth adviser we spoke to thinks significant numbers would come.
Reform UK is proposing a "Britannia card" that would let wealthy foreigners pay a £250k fee to move to the UK, and live here exempt from all tax on their foreign assets.
What they don't say: it would cost the UK £34bn.
Thread:
For many years someone moving to the UK was a "non-dom" - paying tax on UK income/assets but exempt from tax on foreign income/assets (unless they brought them into the UK).
There was then a loooong series of reforms that first introduced a £30k fee for keeping this benefit, then increased the fee. Then finally the Tories scrapped the regime and replaced it with a four year exemption. Labour slightly tightened that this year.