#Zahawi update: his lawyers have written to me, denying that HMRC investigated him under COP 9, the procedure for investigating fraud. Since they are in such a helpful mood, I'm optimistic they'll answer some further questions. Full correspondence below:
My email:
The Osborne Clarke reply:
And my response:
I have updated my list of Zahawi questions to reflect the COP 9 answer.
Obvious addition: anyone thinking of sending abusive messages to Ashley should ask themselves some pretty fundamental questions.
I publish Ashley’s name because I believe lawyers engaging in SLAPP should be accountable, to the public and to their other clients.
A response from Zahawi's lawyer:
The last time Ashley suggested I contact Zahawi's press officer, it did not go well:
But I am hopeful this time is different, so:
You can bookmark this thread to catch the reply.
But I probably wouldn't bother.
I'm delighted to say I received a response to my questions. The response says that Mr Zahawi is not going to answer any questions:
I'm grateful to the Prime Minister for referring Mr Zahawi's actions to Sir Laurie Magnus. I have asked him to confirm that Sir Laurie's remit will not be limited to tax, but will also cover the conflict of interest and the manner in which Mr Zahawi responded to the allegations.
Everyone is talking about the £3.7m of tax that Nadhim Zahawi "carelessly" failed to pay. Perhaps not enough people are talking about the cover-up. taxpolicy.org.uk/2023/01/24/cov…
Here are ten of Mr Zahawi's statements, with links to original sources. Assess for yourself how truthful they were at the time, in light of what we now know:
9 July - to the Times: “All of my business interests were properly dealt with and declared from 2000." thetimes.co.uk/article/explai…
My guess - and it's only a guess - is that the 2020 tax investigation into Zahawi mentioned in this Independent report is *not* connected to YouGov and the 2022 settlement. independent.co.uk/news/business/…
Why? Because if an investigation is looking promising then the next step is for HMRC to open a formal enquiry. That prevents previous years falling out of time (limitation periods); it also enables HMRC to use information powers to require delivery of documents.
It would be contrary to normal practice, and bad strategy - for HMRC to conclude something was going on in 2020, not open an enquiry for two years, and then reach a settlement in 2022. So I am betting they didn't.
So @TimesRadio just asked me if I'm looking at the tax affairs of any other MPs. The answer is yes...
@TimesRadio A journalist is working on a story about another MP who may not have paid tax that was due.
All the credit goes to the journalist working on the story. He had lots of input from a very capable accountant, and I just provided a small assist towards the end...
Perhaps the real Twitter is the friends I met along the way:
Actually, I’ve had countless messages from people I don’t know. Almost all lovely. Many making technical/legal/commercial points that have been hugely helpful.