By "tree defenders", what our 'news' outlets actually mean is "domestic terrorists". They charged these losers in the woods with domestic terrorism in Dec and another round of the same last week. But CNN won't give them The Bundy Treatment. Wrong target.
Nope, whereas the group of ranchers (who didn't shoot cops or throw molotov cocktails at them, nor sabotage govt property for 18mos straight) get painted as an evil national threat, the sycophants at CNN damn near make these terrorists the protagonists. π
Below is how you escape this trap. Read from as many sources as possible. If something contradicts MSM gospel, dig into why. A narrative bull-horned in concert doesnt make truth. They all said vax stopped transmission and Hunter's laptop was a Russian fake
Not only do I not hold admiration or even respect for Harry David, I'm disgusted by who he has become and what he now stands for. The epitome of narcissism and self masquerading in a costume of righteousness built for pity. When my son grows up, I hope he is nothing like that man
The one our CNN heiresses think should should serve as a role-model and beacon for all men... π΅βπ«
There is nothing "euphoric" about this.π In fact, it is the polar-opposite of euphoria; complete inversion as we so frequently see from leftist ideologues.
Look at this imagery (mind you, these were the final cover shots selected). Do you see euphoria?π΅βπ«
Because my eyes function just fine and what I see in this imagery is mental anguish and misery...
I guarantee you the vast majority of Americans see something closer to what I do than "euphoria" radiating from these pictures. So why does ALL of our media present it the opposite?
If the AP African-American History course which Florida has rejected is truly about black history, then why does it include teachings on queer theory and feminism?
What is the nexus between African-Americans in the US and dogma built around "queerness" and radical feminism?
That was a rhetorical question. It's the same thing you see here.π Read those words carefully and tell me, is that a program truly about black lives mattering? Or is that the wide-net casting used to lure many in to something with entirely different objectives?
Also rhetorical.
Exactly. π It's so transparent and empty. But just watch, The Truman Show is going to turn it into the national sequel to "Don't Say Gay"...
DeSantis and "Don't Say Black!" π¬πΏπ΅βπ«
If the new CNN bosses truly want to understand why their company is collapsing, they should begin by analyzing articles like that. Who is the target audience? How large is that audience? Who does the position push away? How large is that group?
This leftist drivel above reminds me of the CNN piece from last year where a 20-something female journo pushed out a scold-scribe on why adult men are doing friendship wrong. Or the same outlet commanding men to get in the kitchen at Thanksgiving
I hope you saw this doozy.π Here's one of our Illustrious Moral Saints of The Left 'defending human rights' by wishing an NHL player would "go back to Russia" and maybe even die fighting Ukraine. Why? Because he wouldnt genuflect to this clown's pet cause
It wasn't that long ago when those words βοΈ would have made you the bad guy in the court of public opinion. Summarily; agreed on by all camps. But then The Human Rights Godπ΅βπ« came. Now the left can be as big of assholes as they want as long as they slap some empty hashtag on it.
"I realized I wasn't bisexual but actually pansexual β which means I'm attracted to people regardless of their sex or gender . . . There was even less opportunity to embrace my sexuality. Parents at school, colleagues at work, new friends heard the words "husband" and "son". . .
. . . I even added pink, yellow, and blue hearts to my social-media bios to represent the pansexual flag. Although pansexuality falls under the queer umbrella, I feared I wasn't gay enough." π΅βπ«
Clearly, what we need to do is create a National Panphobia Awareness Day. It can standly proudly next to National Biophobia Awareness Day and maybe Joe could even give another speech about it. π΅βπ«