Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
Jan 23, 2023 β€’ 20 tweets β€’ 9 min read β€’ Read on X
Ukraine is about to get some 70+ self-propelled artillery systems... time for an artillery thread about:

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ M109A6 Paladin (18x donated)
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ AS-90 (24x donated)
πŸ‡«πŸ‡· CAESAR 8x8 (19x donated by Denmark)
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ Archer (probably 12x donated)

1/n
Before I continue: do you know how NATO 155mm howitzers work? If not, please read my earlier thread about the M777 howitzer.
Once you know how the M777 works (and what primer, fuzes, and charges are), then you will easily understand this thread.

2/n
The M109A6 Paladin is the sixth modification of the M109, which was introduced in 1963.
It's a good system, but AS-90, CAESAR, CAESAR 8x8, Archer, PzH 2000, AHS Krab, and Zuzana 2 are all better systems.

The Paladin still uses a 39 caliber barrel and thus has an 18 liter
3/n
charge chamber, which can hold max. five M232A1 charges. This results in a maximum range of 24 km with boat tail projectiles and 30 km with base bleed projectiles - the same range as the FH70 and M777.

But unlike these two towed howitzers the Paladin has INS/GPS and a
4/n
Muzzle Velocity Radar System (MVRS - red circle). This allows the Paladin to stop and start firing within 50-60 seconds, and means that the barrel adjusts after every around for improved accuracy. (The M777A2 has INS/GPS/MVRS too, but Ukraine received the M777A0 which hasn't)
5/n
But what makes the M109A6 an antique when compared to all the other self-propelled NATO howitzers is the loading of projectile, charges and primer... it's all muscle power.
The only help the crew gets is a pneumatic rammer, which was installed with the M109A5 upgrade.
6/n
Let's look at all the manual steps a Paladin crew has to take to load their gun:
1) move the ramming tray into place
2) grab and place the projectile onto the rammer
3) push the projectile in
4) move the rammer to be barrel
5) remove the ramming tray
6) push in the charges
7/n
8) close the breech
8) grab a primer and insert it
9) hook up the lanyard
And then you're ready to fire.
Paladin crews sweat as much as M777 crews.

Luckily for US Army crews the current M109A7 upgrade adds an electric automatic rammer, which also increases the rate of fire.
8/n
The British Army AS-90 was the most modern NATO self propelled howitzer when it was introduced in 1992.

With automatic gun laying, automatic magazine, semi-automatic projectile loading, automatic projectile ramming, automatic primer loading it was a massive capability
9/n
jump. It's only drawback is its 39 caliber barrel, which limits the AS-90's range. The British Army designed an improved turret with a 52 caliber barrel, which the UK government canceled to save money... but that turret is now used on the Polish AHS Krab (pictured).
10/n
As you can see in the video an AS-90 crew is aided massively by the automated system. This results in a higher rate of fire and less crew fatigue, both important factors in an high-intensity war.

And both, Paladin and AS-90 crews, only have to exit their vehicles when they
11/n
have to reload their vehicles' magazines. At all other times they are protected by their vehicles' armor.

This is different with the CAESAR 8x8. Here the crew has to exit the vehicle to fire the gun.

The 8x8x took everything great about the original CAESAR and improved
12/n
on it: armored crew cabin, more ammo on board, automatic projectile and charge loading, Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact (MRSI), etc. etc.

Here French Army and Danish Army troops operate the first CAESAR 8x8 - note the arm grabbing the projectile and placing it into the
13/n
loading tray. All this allows for a high rate of fire. Also CAESAR 8x8 are ready to fire in 30 seconds and will depart before the first fired projectile hits, which helps protect the exposed crew from enemy counter battery fire.

Naturally the 8x8 has MVRS, GPS, INS and a
14/n
52 caliber barrel with automatic gun laying.

52 caliber barrels have an 23 liter charge chamber, which can hold up to six M232A1 charges and thus have a max. range of 30 km with boat tail projectiles and 40 km with base bleed projectiles

Denmark donated of all (!!) of its
15/n
artillery - a stunning move and Ukrainians will enjoy these 19 CAESAR 8x8 a lot.

Now to the Archer, which is best artillery system in Ukraine (sorry PzH 2000). It is - like the Zuzana 2 - a fully automated system. Once loaded the crew operates the entire system from the
16/n
armored cabin. The Archer has a 52 caliber barrel, fires 9 rounds a minute, can set Excalibur and Bonus rounds automatically. And if the Archer should encounter russian troops, then the crew grabs the joystick or gamepad and lights the russians up with the remote controlled
17/n
heavy machine gun or the 155mm cannon in direct fire mode. Archer - the howitzer the russians will come to fear.

Last but not least: here is a video of the Archer in action. I cut the music at the end so you can hear the sound of the autoloader.
18/n
Ukraine is finally getting all the artillery its needs (including M109L and PzH 2000 from Italy).
Still more is needed: especially dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) projectiles to annihilate russian infantry attacks (a perfectly legal ammunition)
19/n
And above all Ukraine needs Western main battle tanks and infantry fighting vehicles.
Denmark showed the way: donate all of a weapons system to help Ukraine NOW! NOW!

Piecemeal donations prolong the war and cost lives. We have to send Ukraine all it needs and do so NOW!
20/end

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

May 12
In February 2022 putin declared war on Europe & his army marched on Kyiv.
Since then European EU/NATO nations have added and/or are forming these active (!) battalions to their armies:
(Worst 2 countries are of course the two loudmouths)

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± +44 (3 recon, 4 tank, 12 infantry
1/14 Image
2 anti-tank, 6 artillery, 5 air defence, 4 engineer, 1 signal, 1 CBRN defence, 1 transport, 5 logistic)
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ +22 (10 infantry, 3 artillery, 2 engineer, 1 signal, 1 EW, 1 intelligence, 1 transport, 3 logistic)
πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄ +10 (2 infantry, 3 drone, 3 engineer, 1 signal, 1 logistic)
2/n Image
πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ +7 (1 recon, 1 drone, 1 cavalry, 1 artillery, 1 engineer, 1 logistic, 1 transport)
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡± +5 (4 infantry, 1 air defence)
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ +4 (3 artillery, 1 air defence)
πŸ‡­πŸ‡Ί +4 (1 cyber, 1 mechanized, 1 engineer, 1 logistic)
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡° +4 (1 paratrooper, 1 drone, 1 engineer, 1 signal)
3/n
Read 14 tweets
May 8
Europe has to realize that there are two global military powers that it will have to find an arrangements with to safeguard its future security:
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ the US
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Ukraine

These two have the highest defence materiel production output, and troops from these two are present in the
1/9 Image
highest number of nations around the globe (Ukrainian troops are fighting russians in every nation, where russia has allied with the regime; a will to fight our enemies that is sorely lacking in the rest of Europe).
Minor powers like the UK or middling powers like France,
2/9
can't provide as much security (troops, defence equipment, tech innovation, will to fight, etc.) as Ukraine or the US.
While Ukrainians fight, innovate and produce vast amounts of war materiel, Europe continues to fiddle as the fire of war spreads across the continent.
3/9
Read 9 tweets
May 2
Fellow Europeans on here claiming that Europe doesn't need the US to fight off russia are delusional:

Does Europe have enough cruise missiles? No.
Is Europe investing to fix this? Also no.
Does Europe have enough tanker aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix this? Also no.
1/6
Does Europe have enough maritime patrol aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have any ballistic missiles? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have enough SEAD/DEAD aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.
2/6
Does Europe have enough logistic units aircraft? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have enough air defence? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? Also no.

Does Europe have enough recon satellites? No.
Is Europe investing to fix that? A bit.
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Apr 25
On 2 April 1982 Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands.
3 days (!) later a πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Royal Navy task force left the UK to retake the islands.
That task force included: 2Γ— aircraft carriers, 8Γ— destroyers, 16Γ— frigates, 6Γ— attack submarines... a fleet bigger than today's Royal Navy.
1/8 Image
22 Royal Fleet Auxiliary ships provided logistic support... in total 127 ships sailed, and the Royal Navy still (!!) had enough destroyers, frigates, submarines to fulfil its NATO obligations.
It was an awesome display of military power, professionalism, courage and grit.
2/n Image
On 28 February 2026, after weeks of tension, the Iran War began... and even though the UK had been asked by the US for bases weeks earlier, the Royal Navy was caught wholly unprepared... and then it took the Royal Navy 10 days (!) to get 1Γ— destroyer out of port, which after
3/n
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17
To give you an idea, why European militaries prefer US-made weapons to European-made weapons:

Europe militaries urgently need a ground launched cruise missile capability... the US already had such a (nuclear) capability in 1983, then dismantled all of its BGM-109G Gryphon
1/10 Image
ground launched cruise missiles after signing of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
russia of course broke this treaty after putin came to power and after 15 years of ignoring russia lying about it Trump finally ordered to withdraw from the treaty in August 2019.
2/n
Just 16 days after withdrawing from the treaty the US Army began to test launch Tomahawk cruise missiles form land (pic) and in June 2023 (less than 4 years later) the US Army formed the first battery equipped with the Typhon missile system.
And as Raytheon has a production
3/n Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 8
These are the πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ UK's HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carriers.

First, as you can see in this picture, only one actually carries aircraft. The UK barely had enough money to buy the F-35B for one. For the other the Blairites expected the US Marine Corps
1/9 Image
to provide the required aircraft, because the two carriers were bought so the Royal Navy could fight alongside the US Navy against China in the Pacific.

But the US does NOT want the British carriers anywhere near its carrier strike groups, because the UK carriers would slow
2/9
down a US carrier strike groups, as the UK did not have the money for nuclear propulsion.
And as the UK doesn't have the money for the ships that make up a carrier strike group (destroyers, frigates, submarines) the UK expected the US Navy to detach some of its destroyers and
3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(