Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture
Jan 23, 2023 20 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Ukraine is about to get some 70+ self-propelled artillery systems... time for an artillery thread about:

🇺🇸 M109A6 Paladin (18x donated)
🇬🇧 AS-90 (24x donated)
🇫🇷 CAESAR 8x8 (19x donated by Denmark)
🇸🇪 Archer (probably 12x donated)

1/n
Before I continue: do you know how NATO 155mm howitzers work? If not, please read my earlier thread about the M777 howitzer.
Once you know how the M777 works (and what primer, fuzes, and charges are), then you will easily understand this thread.

2/n
The M109A6 Paladin is the sixth modification of the M109, which was introduced in 1963.
It's a good system, but AS-90, CAESAR, CAESAR 8x8, Archer, PzH 2000, AHS Krab, and Zuzana 2 are all better systems.

The Paladin still uses a 39 caliber barrel and thus has an 18 liter
3/n
charge chamber, which can hold max. five M232A1 charges. This results in a maximum range of 24 km with boat tail projectiles and 30 km with base bleed projectiles - the same range as the FH70 and M777.

But unlike these two towed howitzers the Paladin has INS/GPS and a
4/n
Muzzle Velocity Radar System (MVRS - red circle). This allows the Paladin to stop and start firing within 50-60 seconds, and means that the barrel adjusts after every around for improved accuracy. (The M777A2 has INS/GPS/MVRS too, but Ukraine received the M777A0 which hasn't)
5/n
But what makes the M109A6 an antique when compared to all the other self-propelled NATO howitzers is the loading of projectile, charges and primer... it's all muscle power.
The only help the crew gets is a pneumatic rammer, which was installed with the M109A5 upgrade.
6/n
Let's look at all the manual steps a Paladin crew has to take to load their gun:
1) move the ramming tray into place
2) grab and place the projectile onto the rammer
3) push the projectile in
4) move the rammer to be barrel
5) remove the ramming tray
6) push in the charges
7/n
8) close the breech
8) grab a primer and insert it
9) hook up the lanyard
And then you're ready to fire.
Paladin crews sweat as much as M777 crews.

Luckily for US Army crews the current M109A7 upgrade adds an electric automatic rammer, which also increases the rate of fire.
8/n
The British Army AS-90 was the most modern NATO self propelled howitzer when it was introduced in 1992.

With automatic gun laying, automatic magazine, semi-automatic projectile loading, automatic projectile ramming, automatic primer loading it was a massive capability
9/n
jump. It's only drawback is its 39 caliber barrel, which limits the AS-90's range. The British Army designed an improved turret with a 52 caliber barrel, which the UK government canceled to save money... but that turret is now used on the Polish AHS Krab (pictured).
10/n
As you can see in the video an AS-90 crew is aided massively by the automated system. This results in a higher rate of fire and less crew fatigue, both important factors in an high-intensity war.

And both, Paladin and AS-90 crews, only have to exit their vehicles when they
11/n
have to reload their vehicles' magazines. At all other times they are protected by their vehicles' armor.

This is different with the CAESAR 8x8. Here the crew has to exit the vehicle to fire the gun.

The 8x8x took everything great about the original CAESAR and improved
12/n
on it: armored crew cabin, more ammo on board, automatic projectile and charge loading, Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact (MRSI), etc. etc.

Here French Army and Danish Army troops operate the first CAESAR 8x8 - note the arm grabbing the projectile and placing it into the
13/n
loading tray. All this allows for a high rate of fire. Also CAESAR 8x8 are ready to fire in 30 seconds and will depart before the first fired projectile hits, which helps protect the exposed crew from enemy counter battery fire.

Naturally the 8x8 has MVRS, GPS, INS and a
14/n
52 caliber barrel with automatic gun laying.

52 caliber barrels have an 23 liter charge chamber, which can hold up to six M232A1 charges and thus have a max. range of 30 km with boat tail projectiles and 40 km with base bleed projectiles

Denmark donated of all (!!) of its
15/n
artillery - a stunning move and Ukrainians will enjoy these 19 CAESAR 8x8 a lot.

Now to the Archer, which is best artillery system in Ukraine (sorry PzH 2000). It is - like the Zuzana 2 - a fully automated system. Once loaded the crew operates the entire system from the
16/n
armored cabin. The Archer has a 52 caliber barrel, fires 9 rounds a minute, can set Excalibur and Bonus rounds automatically. And if the Archer should encounter russian troops, then the crew grabs the joystick or gamepad and lights the russians up with the remote controlled
17/n
heavy machine gun or the 155mm cannon in direct fire mode. Archer - the howitzer the russians will come to fear.

Last but not least: here is a video of the Archer in action. I cut the music at the end so you can hear the sound of the autoloader.
18/n
Ukraine is finally getting all the artillery its needs (including M109L and PzH 2000 from Italy).
Still more is needed: especially dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) projectiles to annihilate russian infantry attacks (a perfectly legal ammunition)
19/n
And above all Ukraine needs Western main battle tanks and infantry fighting vehicles.
Denmark showed the way: donate all of a weapons system to help Ukraine NOW! NOW!

Piecemeal donations prolong the war and cost lives. We have to send Ukraine all it needs and do so NOW!
20/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas C. Theiner

Thomas C. Theiner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noclador

Sep 13
Of course russia can quickly seize the Suwałki Gap and cut of the Baltics from the rest of NATO... but have you had a look at Kaliningrad's border and the flat dry country beyond?

There are 9 Polish brigades in that area (and 11 in reserve, with 4 more forming). Sure russia
1/5 Image
could move 50,000+ men to Kaliningrad to secure the border or build a defence line along the Pregoła river... but those need to be supplied from Belarus, which also is easily invaded unless russia sends 50,000+ troops to secure its flank there. A buildup of 200,000+ russian
2/5
troops in Belarus would be noticed by NATO (and ordinary people in Belarus, who would upload 100s of videos of the arriving russians).
In summary the main risk isn't that russia suddenly seizes and fortifies the Suwałki Gap... the main risk is that russia starts building up
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Sep 7
The North Atlantic - one of the key battles in a russia-Europe war.

If Europe is defeated here, which with Europe's current forces and capabilities, is almost certain to happen... then russia can nuke the UK without fear of retaliation.

This will be a unsettling thread:
1/40 Image
This battle will be very different from the battles in the Black Sea and Baltic Sea, which I discussed in an early thread, which is linked below.

To understand the North Atlantic Battle we need to look at Imperial Germany's WWI submarine campaign,


2/n
and at the WWII Battle of the Atlantic. We will also have to take a deep dive into the Cold War and that era's submarines and submarine tactics.

In WWI the Imperial German Navy sent some 300+ submarines into the Atlantic, which sank more than 4,000 merchant vessels. The UK
3/n Image
Read 41 tweets
Sep 4
2 days ago I did a thread about the reasons russia can't defeat Ukraine and yet is still a deadly threat to Europe and NATO (link to the thread the next tweet).

Today I will talk about three of the fronts of a russia-Europe war:
1) Black Sea
2) Baltic Sea
3) North Atlantic

1/36 Image
These three fronts will be air and sea battles, while Finland and the Baltics will be air and land battles; about which I will talk in another thread in the coming days.

I do not believe the US under control of Trump or Vance would come to the aid
2/n
of Europe... we will be on our own, which will have very dire consequences for the battle in the North Atlantic and thus the UK.

First, let's look at the Black Sea, where russia's Black Sea Fleet has already been savaged by the Ukrainians (pic: the sinking cruiser Moskva).
3/n Image
Read 36 tweets
Sep 1
• russia has no chance to defeat Ukraine
• russia is a deadly threat to NATO and the EU

Both of these are true... because as of 2025 Ukraine fields a far more capable military than NATO's 30 European members combined (!).

Let me explain.
1/39 Image
As of August 2025 russia fields more than 1,3 million troops; at least half of which are fighting in or against Ukraine.

Ukraine has an estimated 1 million troops... maybe even 1,1 million troops. NATO's European members have double that: some 2.2 million troops, but
2/n Image
(there is always a "but" with European militaries):

• with more than double the personnel European NATO members manage to field only 20% more combat brigades than Ukraine. Partly because Western navies and air forces are bigger, but mostly because in all European militaries
3/n Image
Read 39 tweets
Aug 18
People forget that for most if its history Europe was much, much more militarized than even during the Cold War.

Italy, from the end of the Third War of Independence in 1866 to 1939 fielded always 360-400 battalions, which fell to 110-115 during the Cold War, as the US
1/14 Image
backed its European allies with the its massive air force. Today Italy fields 41 battalions (infantry, tanks, recon, special forces, rangers).

Likewise the British Army fielded for most of its history (especially after the 1908 Haldane reforms) 450-480 battalions, which came
2/n Image
in three types: 150-160 regular battalions (of which a third was always in India), around 100 reserve battalions to provide replacements for the regular battalions, and 200-220 territorial battalions, which (at least on paper) could not be deployed overseas. The British Army
3/n
Read 14 tweets
Jul 4
This is Berlin.

And this is how Berlin would look like 3 days after putin attacks Europe... because Germany doesn't have the air defence ammo to defend any of its city for more than 2 days.
1/12 Image
Image
This is Copenhagen.

And this is how Copenhagen would look like the morning after putin attacks Europe... because Denmark doesn't have any air defence to defend itself.
2/12 Image
Image
This is Paris.

And this is how Paris would look like a day after putin attacks Europe... because France only has SAMP/T air defence systems, which is as of now has very limited capabilities against ballistic missiles.
3/12 Image
Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(