@ACLU's."Identity Crisis: What Digital Driver’s Licenses Could Mean for Privacy, Equity, and Freedom" has more on the risks of #DigitalDriversLicenses.
No fiscal note yet, @WA_DOL's estimate is that it's likely several million dollars in costs
Sen. Mark Mullet, a self-confessed luddite, wants trasnportation committee's help working it out. Other states are implementing, we don't want to be the last!
TImeframes in bill are too aggressive. In the next 12 months we'll get a sense of what format most states are using.
First testimony in person. @WA_DOL: excited about the possibilities, need time. Not sure we want to be first! Challenges: interoperability, acceptance. No standard yet, want to make sure we're betting on the winning horse. WA DOL wants to report back on the approach.
Have they been looking at other states? Yes, sent several people to a confernce in San Diego. Originally suggested a report by 12/2024, could get it done by end of the year. It's not just the visual inspection, there's also the digital key that helps validate it.
@wapeopleprivacy takes a human rights perspective, notes that we have to get beyond just looking at phones as convenice. Need laws that address privacy, data rights, and overreach of law enforcement. Especially important when SCOTUS is taking away rights
@wapeopleprivacy: need to take our time with it, dont back into a national ID card until we have more protections in place.
Cynthia Spiesss, pleae either oppose or amend. Section 1 is good, Sections 2 and 3 require implementation. Premature! What if passing the bill rsults in laswsuits?
Up next @jdp23 -- that's me, so a short break from live-tweeting.
@jennifer_e_lee of @ACLU_WA is CON. Brings up several risks of digital drivers licenses. Law enforcement could use digital driver's license verification as a pretext to search people's devices;
Records of digital ID checks could be held in a centralized database and allow for tracking of our everyday activities;
Agencies issuing licenses could instantly and remotely revoke digital driver's licenses, exacerbating abusive practices of driver's license suspensions;
Next testifier supports digital drivers license, agrees we should study the issue and come back in 2024.
- requires opt-in consent before companies collect, use, or share data
- prohibits sales of health data
- restricts geofencing around health facilities
The 2023 session is already in high gear, and once again there's some significant privacy legislation.
If you're just tuning in, "What's Past is Prologue" and "Significant successes for Washington privacy advocates" have the backstory. privacy.thenexus.today/wa-privacy-mor…
The Seattle Community Police Commission is discussing ShotSpotter at this morning's meeting. Public comment has just wrapped up. Now, @jennifer_e_lee from @ACLU_WA is presenting. #StopShotSpotter
@jennifer_e_lee@ACLU_WA Oops, connection problems. Up next, Angélica Chazaro with quotes from the October 27 Rainier Beach town hall.
"ShotSpotter is giving them a license to hunt bodies. It's a waste of money. It's about control."
"I think more money can go into housing. Also, being put back into communities."
"We want to do things in partnership and this tech is opposite to that."
Today's Nexus of Privacy Newsletter:
- what Karen memes teach us about white women and surveillance
- privacy nutrition labels
- upcoming events
- an abolitionist take on Section 230
- news from across the pond ... and more!
Let's start with the events. Today at 1:30 Pacific time (4:30 Eastern) is @ruha9's @ColumbiaEthics talk on Viral Justice: Pandemics, Policing, and Public Bioethics"
ADPPA still hasn't hit the House floor, and Speaker Pelosi is still opposed to preempting California. Rep. Pallone says there's still time to pass something, and expresses optimism.
How likely is ADPPA to pass this session? (1/5)
If ADPPA doesn't pass, how far will it get?
- no House (H) floor vote?
- H passes, but no Senate (S) action?
- progress in S but dies before floor vote?
- S amends, but dies in cross-chamber reconciliation?
ADPPA currently preempts most stronger state and local privacy laws. California and AGs from other states want this removed so ADPPA is "a floor not a ceiling".
Compromise proposals include giving CA a waiver or adding a 5- or 10-year sunset.
The Executive Order to Try to Implement the European Union-U.S. Data Privacy Framework has been announced. Will the third time be a charm? @astepanovich, who's followed the issue for years, has a good thread.
"It fails to adequately protect the privacy of Americans and Europeans, and it fails to ensure that people whose privacy is violated will have their claims resolved by a wholly independent decision-maker,”