A system that lauds the altruistic giving to charities, while saying all poverty is personal failing, tried to further tax the taxed to pay a premium for life-saving healthcare, while also concealing huge corruption and kick backs in return for powerful positions
Billions wasted or overlooked as sweeteners for deals and favours
Eroding human rights and broad access to affordable legal advice. Weakening unions and the right to protest, with more to come
Complicating voting, making the local elections first past the post
Demanding benefit irregularities are stamped down on further to the tune of billions more given to private firms doing the stamping
While effort to avoid as much tax as feasible is a badge of honour in the cabinet. Slightly careless trust formation a trivial oversight
Colonial history , mention of any LGBTQ folk, critiquing capitalism all need to be kept out the mind of impressionable youngsters
While free speech of folk who push the product of that kind of closed minded intolerance is the thing most vehemently defended
Transparency and a deterrent for public dissent is aim if surveilling social media for plans to stage a protest. but calls for a stop to lies and incendiary language (that led to death threats for lawyers) saw Home Office call for evidence to be removed from public domain
Perhaps some contradictions?
All of our fundamentally needed services and utilities have been increasingly monetised, with the deterioration in quality / delivery
While ministers work to coerce workers to increase productivity with no commensurate reward for work to burnout to provide that
Banking deregulation a core plan as is deregulation in freeports and more generally in the country
While devastating impacts in the existing sites like Teesside is still not being effectively scrutinised
Calling for civility in parliament when opposition MPs, or even, (over fracking), their own party revolt
While Lee, Bridgen, Braverman, Gullis, Jenkyns, Dorries, Jacob Rees-Mogg et al, farm outrage about all of our essential workers
A former leader with huge and unanswered questions about his trips to visit ex-KGB officers in Italy, works to rehabilitate an image as wartime leader via a rapid taxpayer funded trip to Kyiv and before that a trip to David
Having previously earned more than £1m for speaking fees, in part to crypto and other more traditional finance audiences
Abandoning constituents and now potentially getting airlifted into a safer Conservative seat. A thing that is somewhat of a rarity
Might we need governance rather than spin and showmanship at this incredibly fragile time in history?
The poverty as failing narrative is partnered with a 'something for nothing' scrounger line in RW media
Figures for the inactive include retirees, most who paid tax all of their lives and now watch effort to make all work more precarious
In a small and increasingly more isolated nation, innovation will be vital. Leading drives to renewable energy and sustainable and novel technologies that benefit many
DCMS is spearheading this, first under Dorries, forcing through many half-baked laws and regulations
Sorry, not first under Dorries, we had Dowden before that. Perhaps a few others, hard to keep track
A recent EU delegation said the plans to weaken data protection were devoid of any human rights consideration, even surpassing the profit focus seen in Hungary
Do feel free to challenge, I have a source for every single one of these statements. For some I have a few dozen. This thread will be incredibly long and growing
Vital correction, a trip to Davos, but there are renewed questions about backchannels to Cameron regarding contracts for Greensill and Illumina - a genomics firm
Back to DCMS and the task to lead us in vital tech innovation
They were tasked under Dorries with writing UK's semiconductor strategy. Critical for most of the new manufacturing and other forms of domestic tech capability
The output reportedly could have been written by a keen undergrad who had flexed their search skills
Honestly the outcome, do your own searching if you have any passing interest in such things
As the right wing talking heads are so very fond of telling you
Speaking of supportive tech to make rapid gains in sustainable energy. Our much hyped battery startup is now in administration
Might talking a good game and having to lean on populists (who not just ignore but discredit the domain specialists) be unhelpful?
Our automotive industry was a jewel in the pre-Brexit trade crown. Now investment is far lower as is revenue generated
Perhaps the pre-Brexit sectoral impact assessments, supply chain understanding, and some transparent post-Brexit studies might help inform doing better?
David Davies told us no sectoral assessments happened, Johnson binned our industrial strategy in 2019. A supply chain research body under Johnson stopped work without having really started
Rees-Mogg says there is no point studying post-Brexit effects. We should trust assurances
Mr Rees-Mogg and supportive and ever more right wing chorus tell us that this bonfire of our rights, regulations, protections will be beneficial for households
Almost everyone with any insight into the likely outcome has been shouting about the opposite
The plan is his 'brainchild'. A man who has persistently dismissed impacts on households as trivial
A man whose father wrote 'Blood on the Streets' a manual for the quashing of dissent and making optimal profit after the welfare state has been dismantled
Sins of fathers... etc, but it is not contradicted by subsequent conduct, whether post-hoc health and safety advice for families of those who were trapped in buildings, or calling border checks that were required by our EU-exit an act of self-harm.
Maybe cruel and inconsistent?
That such a man was promoted to lead BEIS and Braverman had to be reappointed to a great office of state, is maybe some indication of the cost we all pay for a government that has to bow to incompetent or coopted populists to retain power
Braverman is trapped between the mounting evidence of dire migrant processing backlogs and need to sustain the ERG anti-immigrant talking points. It was very apparent in her response to the Holocaust survivor recently
You should all listen to the whole video and judge against all of the historical lies about immigration figures, Rwanda programme cost vs benefit. language used to sell it and downright hate promotion
Hate crimes were credibly linked and Patel allegedly hid evidence
No-where is this dichotomy in campaigning Vs economic need more apparent, than in relation to the Indian trade deal. A key part of that is granting of freer and more liberal movement of Indian tech and other specialists into UK.
Will the government collapse (yet again) under weight of contradictions?
Perhaps like many ailing firms who try to restructure and cut their way to better, dismissing the ground floor warnings from workers about unsustainable work, evident and predictable impact, and the erosion of terms and conditions. Is it working?
Perhaps, unlike firms who then listen to their experienced and skilled managers and effect change before it's too late, they will just continue to outsource strategy to consultants (think tanks) with eyes on follow on work and new contracts, not on any kind of long-term welfare
Businesses, as we know from leaks, are craving stability. Is that in any way feasible with a party in power that is direly divided?
Who else gets caught in crossfire as factions scrabble for position?
Securing the golden parachutes for their time as an opposition party
As the debunked 'Tragedy of the Commons' theory goes, those who are given something for nothing will work as hard as is feasible to ringfence it all for their own benefit. It was not born out on scrutiny of the sources
In the same way the Lord of the Flies, used as emblematic of the abject chaos if people are left to their own devices, was not at all as it was dramatised. The real life incident it was based on saw the kids look out for each other
Perhaps (just possibly), those raised to believe that others will always take what is theirs and default to laziness if given means to avoid hunger and cold, are the ones in power and the ones who are benefiting from governing on that basis.
It is contrary to evidence in many prior UK and other governments
Might greed, cruelty, dishonesty, fear mongering and governance soaked in corruption, removing accountability, excusing more wrongdoing, make expectations a broadly self-fulfilling prophecy?
Who are they ruling for and who is set to benefit? Honestly people?
We can do better. There is acres of space between this market fundamentalism and communism
It serves political purposes to try and polarise you to ignore that
Out today. Johnson reportedly briefed Cambridge Analytica that minutes must not come out due to risk of damaging diplomatic UK-US relations. Perhaps telling? bylinetimes.com/2023/01/26/min…
Some history of the advertising at the time of the referendum, partly informed by work I have done on occasion with brokers in my role as data protection GRC specialist
We need specialists, not loyalists and populists back in driving seats
Just like tolerating politicised and bad faith demonisation of others
If we swallow PR about what will be delivered and ignore the drip drip drip of failure to do so with 40 hospitals, 15k nurses, 20k new police, Levelling UP, better transport for the North...
There is never effective sanction for non-delivery. Govt and the private firms consulting to plan and then falling short so often
Just like happens with the Covid response. The record spend on the private sector Test, Trace and Isolate, failing while established NHS capacity cried out for those funds and then had to prop up the private firms to finally deliver
Basis for this outrage merchant's tweet and Daily Mail headline?
You guessed it. Another Civitas 'study' that includes 11 million of our pensioners who mainly also paid tax all of their working lives
As said before it always escalates
From easier to dismiss persistent and worsening child poverty in the North, that we gloss over as another scandal hits, to spinning up criticism of their voter base to justify even harsher new policies
This coming out coincided with the above stuff and headline. I am no longer writing such things off as any kind of coincidence. It is coordinated political PR to give a grounds for the brutal austerity
Over the last 6 years I combatted a sense of horrified helplessness by keeping the breadcrumbs of history in a form I could go back to reference in monster threads
I am well placed with skills and contacts to make a killing, but not at the expense of so many others
We are not stupid people and this is a country with huge potential
Truth, trust, transparency, hope and accountability are essential to realise that
Far more humanely and equitably for all in the country
Prior to dedicating more time to this I volunteered substantial time to a non-profit working on ethics focused AI governance solutions
All the rushed automation of so many gateway services for things like benefits and healthcare, was a persistent concern, so I put my money where my mouth was and spent months researching all that
You think that so many are free to speak out and take action, but are they really? Unable to do the same due to damaging optics for their current or future employers
Mounting sanctions for protest and reporting critical of government
How many will take the risk now?
Another topical related thread on that slide on free expression and routes to redress for any overreach
With a business degree heavy on economics and econ history, plus a long career in IT, cybersecurity and data protection GRC, also an independence from employers as I consult, I am reasonably well placed to research and join dots
In this news ecosystem with data hungry power brokers and power hungry data brokers, perhaps my using my related knowledge to do this is more essential than stupid?
Will there be any independent election observers in May to document the number of people who are turned away and delays / queues relative to normal operation of polling stations?
Who could organise that without accusation of bias. I would help
Are all the staff getting adequate training? Are they prepared with response to challenge or any bad faith stirring of trouble about mail in ballots. A stitch in time, grist to mill for a fight for roll back for the next GE on basis of any real or other issues documented?
The potential for chaos being created by certain portions of the media is not a trivial concern here
The quoted tweet above is the bottom of the kind of thread I spend about half my work week researching to putting together
No vested interest or pay for it, just piecing together some much needed context. IMHO better informed people make for a better place for us all to live
Long way of saying if you wanted to buy me a wee coffee it would help with cost of books, fees for events, subscriptions and the other stuff OH despairs of me consuming to keep facts straight
Good people will work to change bad governance, but if there is resistance to change in all layers of an org, the most likely result is a reduction in talent pool to just those aligned, those who have to sit tight, and those compromised
That Dacre was even considered, twice, was a coffin nail in trust for me. OfCom has control over the Codes of Conduct for the Online Safety Bill. Better with Mr Grade?
Ministers will be able to influence codes for public policy purposes
Small state does not mean what you think it does. It may mean a bit lower tax (eventually), but you are taxed indirectly by losing the power of stare negotiation on a price for essential services. 1/2
Saving you more than repay in higher prices, due to margins added by private firms who act as tax subsidised intermediaries answerable to shareholders and investors, including some in our current government. Some who are carefully brokering the deals
Assets and subsidies that the government make attractive to acquire. Land, property, services, schools, hospitals, care homes
Leave via radical deregulation to fill boots in short-term while the routes to redress for impacts are being weakened. Who will gain? Who will pay? 3/3
Kids need boundaries. They also need freedom. Parents who will explain why and explain effects that actions have on others. Be strong enough to stand up to a week worth of 'I want' 'Why?' and 'No!' when it matters, but careful not to crush spirits. Listening too
Unique combinations of parent, child, circumstance adjust that
Why am I wading into the murky water of parenting? Because this government, who claim personal autonomy and responsibility are sacrosanct, dictated changes to education that disempower parents
A former Education minister as an example of bad faith outrage farming. Part of a thread flagging the equally bad faith free speech fights
Little to do with raising kids to think critically and take responsibility for being a member of a broader society