#panr $panr $pthrf
There appears to be a massive misunderstanding about what the "illustrative" Alkaid model published by $panr means. I think I can be of some assistance 😇.
The NPV figures released yesterday formed a *base* case on the *current* volume and the...1/
...*current* hydrocarbon mix, incorporating the *current* pricing of ANS (oil/NGL/condensate) and addressing the Alkaid reservoir *only*.
Current mkt cap: $500m
Alkaid anomaly NPV10 @ $80 oil = $423m
Alkaid anomaly NPV10 @ $70 oil = $223m
Alkaid anomaly NPV10 @ $60 oil = $12m
2/
#panr $panr $pthrf
A) Volume expected to improve in absolute *and* per thousand feet terms after the blockage is cleared. Nordic rig arrives at Alkaid-2 pad today to begin clean-out procedure. 7-10 days duration.
B) Hydrocarbon mix is expected to improve after the frack...3/
...sand blockage has been cleared as the ratio of oil within the hydrocarbon mix grows.
C) Company stated they weren't yet collecting the volumetric data for *all* the NGLs being produced. Management stated specifically they knew further "higher value" NGLs were being...4/ #panr
...produced but they lacked the equipment to collect that data currently. They have *not* included any such value for these as yet unmeasured NGLs in their *base case* NPVs.
D) Future production wells in a full field development will be >8000ft laterals...5/ #panr $pthrf $panr
...and not 5300ft.
E) The Alkaid anomaly reservoir constitutes a relatively small 3-4% of $panr's total recoverable resource of 2.3bbo. Both Talitha and Theta West dwarf Alkaid in scale (10x, 20x) and have superior reservoir characteristics so field economics...6/ #panr $pthrf
...are modelled to be better than that of the Alkaid Unit.
F) Alkaid was drilled and put on a Long Term Production Test (LTPT) *before* the other, far larger reservoirs *precisely because* it is situated c.200m from the Dalton Highway. Plus the SoA allowed the...7/ #panr $panr
...construction of a gravel pad for all year round activity.
G) The Alkaid anomaly constitutes c.3-4% of PANR's total recoverable resource of 2.3bbo. At $80 oil *and with a partially blocked lateral* the company is stating that not only is Alkaid commercial *as is* but it...8/
...also pretty much supports the current mkt cap.
So the smallest (of 5) reservoirs which constitutes 3-4% of #panr's total recoverable resource has an NPV10 value (at $80 oil) of $423m v's a mkt cap of $500m. The market is telling us that Talitha and...9/
$panr
...Theta West (described by AHS Baker Hughes as "a world class petroleum system") are worth zero.
Do the math(s). The market is dead wrong IMO.
Best wishes to the crew of the Nordic rig as they work to unblock the Alkaid-2 lateral. News in the coming days/weeks. #panr $panr
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
$panr #panr $pthrf
Seeking Alpha won't publish my fact check so here it is. Sorry about the length of the thread but it was written for a different platform. 1/
"Fact check: condensate and NGLs are produced elsewhere on the North Slope. For example Exxon produces >10,000 barrels per day of condensate/NGLs and fully 7% of Conoco's ANS production is condensate/NGLs. The author states, "While the oil is easily...2/
$panr #panr $pthrf
..."marketable due to the proximity of a pipeline, the NGLs are less marketable and likely receive a fraction of the net price of the oil." There is no issue with the oil part of the sentence but please note the author has deleted any reference to condensate. 3/
$panr #panr
#panr $pthrf
I've read a disappointingly large number of dreadfully ill-informed commentary following today's RNS, especially as it pertains to the differential between $panr's OIP figure of >23bbo and Schlumberger's 17.8bbo. 1/
The RNS spells out the primary reason for the differential: "Schlumberger's OIP estimates for Theta West were constrained to the project's 3D footprint with more conservative reservoir parameters than Pantheon's at the lease boundaries. 2/ #panr $panr $pthrf
With additional drilling data points, potential exists for Schlumberger's modelling estimates to increase in the future."
On a higher level, it is uneventfully mundane and utterly bog-standard for external experts in the O&G industry to publish reports which...3/
$panr #panr
$panr $pthrf #panr
Some highlights from today's RNS which are being missed (deliberately or not) by commentators.
- "Schlumberger's report represents the most comprehensive model completed on evaluating the discovered oil resource and the productive potential." 1/
- "The Schlumberger model is extremely detailed, comprising c. 13 million individual three dimensional cells within the c. 153,000 acres of Pantheon's current leasehold."
- "This model is extremely comprehensive, having been developed over the past six months and...2/
$panr #panr
...involved in excess of 1,000 man-hours with a team of reservoir, geological and geophysical specialists at Schlumberger and is an important step toward modelling reservoir development scenarios and attracting future project partners and supporting project..3/
$panr #panr $pthrf
$panr $pthrf #panr
Some direct quotes from Canaccord (C) and WH Ireland (WHI) in response to Pantheon Resources' RNS dated 8/12/22.
- Canaccord (C): "We see these results as validations of both Pantheon's internal assessments of the very large scale of the oil-in-place...1/
...resources and the potential well productivity. The reservoir models will significantly aid development
planning, and they are likely to form key elements of any future farm-out discussions."
- C: "We maintain our Speculative Buy rating and NPV10-risked...2/
$panr $pthrf #panr
...target price of 300p and we see the Schlumberger report as an important step in the derisking process."
- C: "Pantheon's internal estimates - not significantly different Resources: Pantheon had estimated 23 bnbbls oil-in-place across the four reservoirs. 3/
$panr #panr $pthrf
$pthrf
I note the increasingly desperate Josh Young has today published an article on $panr on Seeking Alpha. In it, he attempts to derive a fair valuation for #panr by using the price bid per acre in the recent State of Alaska North Slope lease auction and applying...1/
...that figure to $panr's total acreage. Deary me, this is facile stuff from Josh, genuinely immature if I'm being blunt. Perhaps Josh is getting grief from MW, Mangrove et al for bouncing them into a non-researched short?!
Here's the thing, if we apply Josh's logic to..2/ #panr
...the dollar amounts bid per acre by Hilcorp (the operator of Prudhoe Bay) on blocks directly adjacent to Prudhoe Bay, Josh would have us value PB's 213,543 acres at a massive $6.04m!!! Yes, that's $6.04m for PB using Josh Young's infantile rationale. 3/
$panr #panr $pthrf
$pthrf
Thread on why being short $panr as the company enters an intense period of consequential news is going up against the clear balance of probabilities.
(a) The flow test results from Alkaid-2, #panr's first production well, are imminent. The flow test will not,...1/
...in itself, be a binary event for the $panr investment case (there are four other distinct reservoirs on #panr's acreage) but it is obvious the initial flow results from A2 will be treated in that manner by many in the market.
(b) Guidance from $pthrf management...2/
...states that a flow rate of 150bopd per 1000ft of lateral will support a declaration of commerciality for the Alkaid anomaly. Thus, 150 x 5.3 = 795bopd.
(c) The Alkaid anomaly was flow tested successfully in 2019 at Alkaid-1. A 6ft (yes, only 6ft) interval was...3/
$panr #panr