Earlier I posted a thread about how Abrams, Leopard & Challenger, and Bradley, Marder & CV90 combine with infantry and armored support vehicles during an combined arms attack.
As people asked about the supporting & sustainment elements of a combined arms attack I will do now
1/25
a thread about these.
Please read my earlier thread before continuing with this one. Here I will give you a very rough overview of the elements an armored brigade or division staff has to plan, prepare and execute for a successful armored attack.
Reconnaissance: commanders need to know where the enemy is, where he has concentrated his forces, where he moves to or retreats.
Ground & air assets of a brigade's recon battalion reconnoiter ahead of the armored spearhead. Nowadays drones are the most used recon asset, but 3/n
before the ubiquitousness of drones helicopter recon and reconnaissance planes like the RF-4E Phantom were a key aerial recon elements.
Ground recon comes in many forms: from long-range reconnaissance patrols to armored reconnaissance with tanks. What kind of recon is chosen 4/n
depends on terrain and enemy, and if you scout or probe: the former observes the enemy, but doesn't engage him, while the latter engages him and gains intelligence from his reaction.
To scout you use easy to disguise, small armored cars like the Dutch/German Fennek, 5/n
to probe you attack with something with more firepower: i.e. Italian Army Centauro Tank Destroyers, French Army AMX-10 RC, or US Army M3A3 Bradley Cavalry Fighting Vehicles, or British Army Ajax Scout Vehicles.
But there are also vehicles that combine scouting and probing, 6/n
like the French EBRC Jaguar, which is an armored car with a 40mm autocannon and Akeron MMPs, or the Norwegian CV90 Mk IIIb Recce, which is an IFV with added reconnaissance capabilities.
In the coverless Steppe of Southern Ukraine armored reconnaissance & drones will be used; 7/n
in wooded northern Luhansk scouting & drones will be used.
Once the enemy's location and composition is clear you want to hit him with artillery, for which you have Forward Artillery Observation Vehicles, like the Swedish Epbv 90 or the M7 Bradley Fire Support Vehicle. 8/n
These vehicles will direct artillery and mortar fire onto the enemy positions; and you have to have self-propelled artillery, because your howitzers must be able to keep up with your attack formations and they must be able to start firing quickly once the enemy is discovered. 9/n
You will also need mobile artillery radars to discover from where enemy artillery fires at your armored spearhead; and M270 MLRS with GMLRS rockets to hit enemy positions, that were newly discovered or were already known and only now came into range. 10/n
If there is a river to cross, you have to ready a water crossing engineer unit with i.e. the Improved Ribbon Bridge, which can be used as a pontoon bridge or as ferries.
If Ukraine wants to cross the Dnipro river in Kherson Oblast, it will need a lot of such bridge elements. 11/n
An armored spearhead also needs armored command and control vehicles, and signal units to ensure communication between all parts of the spearhead function properly.
Also you better bring Military Police along to secure the rear, command posts, supply points and POWs. 12/n
Electronic Warfare vehicles, mortar carriers, artillery ammo carriers, air defense, engineer units to repair your lines of communication, all this is needed - and needs to be readied before an attack can begin.
(photo: a US M992A2 Field Artillery Ammunition Supply Vehicle) 13/n
Also: a combat support hospital is key if you care about your troops. And enough armored ambulances to bring your wounded troops out of the combat zone.
If you can use medical evacuation helicopters - even better, but then your logistics become much more complicated. 14/n
Logistics - the biggest and most complicated of all the elements, and the most important. You have to bring fuel, ammo, food, & water to your frontline troops - they must never run out of anything!
You need huge logistic depots behind the front and a vast fleet of trucks to 15/n
continuously ferry supplies forward. Trucks have to run 24/7 and the maintenance crews have to fix every broken truck no matter how little sleep they had.
You must be able to refuel an entire Bradley company in minutes and bring enough ammo for the entire battalion. 16/n
If your logistics can't keep up with the speed of your advance - well if you're the US Army - then you fly fuel & ammo in, because you never want to lose momentum. Once the enemy is one the run you gotta keep him running. So plan your logistics accordingly - & remember: 17/n
too many supply trucks is always still too few supply trucks.
Ukraine doesn't have air supremacy yet, but once you achieve that, you want a lot of air assets in the air to cover your spearhead from enemy air attacks and to smite enemy units before they come even close to 18/n
your troops. This requires a lot of coordination between air assets and ground forces - that is why you have Joint Terminal Attack Controllers, who direct close air support (CAS) from a forward position.
But once you get close air support, you need also fighter jets, which 19/n
will protect your CAS aircraft from enemy fighters. And you need fighters that suppress enemy air defenses (SEAD).
Like this Eurofighter with an air-to-air load of Meteor, AIM-120, and IRIS-T missiles; and these two F-16CM Block 50 with a SEAD load of AGM-88 HARM missiles. 20/n
Naturally if you have fighter cover you can use your attack helicopters, which are crudely said flying infantry fighting vehicles with an autocannon to annihilate infantry and light armored vehicles, Anti-Tank Guided Missiles to destroy tanks, and unguided rockets to destroy 21/n
everything else. If your Apaches, Vipers, Mangusta, Tiger can fly - so can your Predators, Reapers, Bayraktars, etc.
The advantage of combat drones is naturally that they can immediately destroy an enemy position they just have discovered. 22/n
Combined arms is a complex art and NATO armies continuously train every aspect and element again and again and again. Well planned and executed combined arms attacks can crush the Iraqi Army in four days.
Ukraine will receive a full armored brigade set of tanks, IFVs, and 23/n
support vehicles from the US. Training how to seamlessly use these will take some time. But they learn from the best (UK, US, etc.)
Last but not least: the tank is an integral part of combined arms, without it you will not succeed. Only people, who know nothing about 24/n
combined arms say nonsense like "tanks are a deathtrap now."
Tanks are the tip of the spear, with which Ukraine will slice through the russian front and liberate the South and East, and Crimea.
Just learn and master combined arms before you attack.
25/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gripen fans continue to spam my mention with claims how fantastic Sweden's Bas 90 and Gripen combination is... and that it would work for Canada's North too...
Ok, let's quickly compare Canada's three northern territories (Yukon, Northwest, Nunavut) and Sweden... ... 1/6
Land area:
🇸🇪 450,295 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
🇨🇦 terr.: 3,593,589 km2 (173,860 sq mi)
The land area of just the three territories (without Canada's 10 provinces) is already 8 times bigger than all of Sweden...
(In total Canada's land area is 9,984,670 km2
2/6
(3,855,100 sq mi) or 22 times Sweden).
Population:
🇸🇪 10.61 million
🇨🇦 terr.: 0.13 million
Sweden's population is 81.6 times bigger than that of the three territories... and if you look at population density:
🇸🇪 23,6/km2
🇨🇦 terr.: 0,013/km2
3/6
Saab loooves to tout the claim that the Gripen can "operate from dispersed air bases".
They do that, because they know no one of you knows what it means. And every time I see someone regurgite "dispersed air bases" (or "road runways" or "short runways") I know I am dealing
1/36
with someone, who knows absolutely nothing about the topic.
So allow me to take you on a deep dive into what "operating from dispersed air bases" actually means.
Let's start with Såtenäs Air Base in Southern Sweden - the most important Swedish air base. 2/n
When the Viggen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
When the Gripen E entered service, Såtenäs received it first.
In the 1950s Sweden developed the Bas 60 system, which would have dispersed the Swedish 3/n
The 11th Airborne Division is the least likely to be used to invade #Greenland.
The division's deputy commander is Canadian. He is responsible for Operations. The 11th would have to arrest part of their own officers, before being able to plan a Greenland invasion.
Also
1/6
there are just 8 C-17 Globemaster aircraft at Elmendorf Air Force Base. The USAF would need to fly a dozen more up to Alaska, which of course Canada would notice. Then to reach Greenland the C-17 would have to cross Canada's North, which NORAD's Canadian officers would report
2/6
to the Canadian and Danish governments.
It is much more likely the US will inform allies that a brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg will fly to the Middle East, which means the air route will take them right over Greenland. And at Fort Bragg you also have the
3/6
This is a typical clown tweet by someone, who knows nothing about WWII.
3 years before D-Day, the Soviets & nazis were in a love-feast, while the US had not entered the war; & when it did it had to cross an ocean full of nazi submarines to stage troops & materiel for D-Day.
1/14
And unlike the warmongering Soviets, which in June 1941 fielded 304 divisions, the US Army fielded just 37 divisions when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor (+ two Marine Corps divisions).
Before any D-Day the US Army had to start forming new divisions (38 in 1942 and 17 in 1943) &
2/n
then ship those divisions across the Atlantic, which was teeming with German subs, while the Soviets just used trains to bring troops and materiel to the front (& if the Soviet had had to ship troops across an ocean, they would have just accepted that a third of their troops
3/n
The @RoyalAirForce - once the strongest air force in Western Europe... but now...
7 Eurofighter Typhoon squadrons are expected to fulfill the tasks, for which 35 years ago the RAF fielded 40 squadrons (31 active & 4 reserve + 5 shadow squadrons, which would have been formed
1/27
from the personnel & fighters of the RAF's operational conversion units).
At the end of the Cold War these 40 squadrons were assigned to 4 commands, each with a specific mission & enough aircraft to fulfill their mission.
No. 1 Group was tasked with striking Soviet forces
2/27
in Northern Germany, including with WE.177 tactical nukes.
The Group fielded 8 active, 4 reserve and 2 shadow squadrons, which flew Tornado GR1, Jaguar GR1A, and Harrier GR5 fighters (the reserve squadrons flew Hawk T1A). The group also included the RAF's 3 aerial
3/27
Since there are still people claiming the Gripen is the "ideal fighter for Canada"... here are the refueling stops the Gripen C/D needed to get from Ronneby in Sweden to Eielson Air Base in Alaska.
So of course this is an "ideal fighter" for Canada... as it will have to stop 1/5
at every Canadian airfield to refuel...
For the curious ones:
On 13 July 2006 five Gripen C and two Gripen D left
their base in Ronneby Sweden. They refueled at RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland, then flew to NAS Keflavik in Iceland, where they refueled and stayed overnight.
2/5
On 14 July the Gripens flew to Sondre Stromfjord in Greenland for another refueling, then proceeded to RCAF Iqualuit in Canada for refueling and the night.
On 15 July the Gripens flew to Churchill, refuelled and then flew to RCAF Cold Lake, where they spent 16 July to rest.
3/5