These are professional photographers with the best cameras money can buy.
People who have been taking pictures for years.
The grain is testament to the labour required to develop the images from negatives.
Manual focus.
Manual exposure.
There was no auto focus or auto exposure on these cameras.
Colour bleeds and grain are authentic.
The very best photographers with the very best cameras can't adjust for minor movements which blur the image.
If you have been doing this for years and focus on one place, set the shutter speed very low and have full sun you might get an image like this
Or maybe even this. These cars are travelling approximately 200 mph.
Thankfully all these difficulties were solved in 1969 when NASA strapped a big "click me" button on a Hasselblad and every single picture came out perfect... weforum.org/agenda/2019/07…
Hasselblad are very proud of their history, and rightly so. They were the people that made these impossible pictures possible hasselblad.com/about/history/…
Full sun.
No exposure adjustment.
No auto focus.
No viewfinder.
The first point and shoot camera.
Hi resolution, grain free pictures. Every one.
#thankshasselblad
And here is another picture showing the stripped down Hasselblad, full of dust, able to take perfect grain-free pictures with the click of a big button.
The button was big because of the gloves, which expand even more in a vacuum.
Remember too that this is bright sunlight - there are no clouds on the moon. In fact in the daytime the surface temperature is 140 celsius.
They stripped the camera down to save weight.
That enabled them to fit the lunar buggy in the lunar module
#scottiebluepills
The moon buggy itself was a feat of engineering, the tyres were steel mesh only - to withstand the vaccuum and 140 degree heat on the surface. moon.nasa.gov/resources/484/…
It's difficult to make out from the images but in fact the lunar buggy was able to fold up in order to fit into the lunar module.
Just one of many essential firsts required in 1969 to get mad to drive around on the moon.
#scottiebluepills scifacts.net/space/nasas-mo…
The moon buggy was truly amazing. For Apollo 17 the astronauts drove it for 100km with a max speed of 11 km/h.
10 hours driving is exhausting in 140 degree heat. I hope the airconditing was working! moon.nasa.gov/resources/153/…
And the Hasselblad performed brilliantly on all the missions. Here is a close up of the lunar module which fit the lunar buggy, two astronauts, an 8kW 1Mflp computer for guidance and moon rocks. This one is the Apollo 12 version
The 8kW 1megaflop computer was necessary to dock the moon lander travelling at 2000km/h (escape velocity) to the orbiting rocket travelling at 5500km/h (lunar orbit speed) in perpendicular directions.
Taking a picture in such extreme circumstances requires extreme skill
This picture was famously taken through a window of the earlier Apollo 8 mission
The coup de grace of filmography was this famous image of the moonlander travelling towards Apollo 11 to dock.
This iconic image was taken by Michael Collins as he guided the rocket travelling at 5500mk/h away from the moonlander, using a spare camera.
#scottiebluepills
Any that's enough for this trip down memory lane. Hope you enjoyed it. If you find any other high resolution images from 1969 please post them - and remember genuine pictures only please!
*man
*airconditioning
Just one more note in relation to those mesh tyres developed in 1969 that could drive for 100km.
It seems that they were still struggling with the problem in 2017.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.
In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.
But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.
Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25):
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.