These are professional photographers with the best cameras money can buy.
People who have been taking pictures for years.
The grain is testament to the labour required to develop the images from negatives.
Manual focus.
Manual exposure.
There was no auto focus or auto exposure on these cameras.
Colour bleeds and grain are authentic.
The very best photographers with the very best cameras can't adjust for minor movements which blur the image.
If you have been doing this for years and focus on one place, set the shutter speed very low and have full sun you might get an image like this
Or maybe even this. These cars are travelling approximately 200 mph.
Thankfully all these difficulties were solved in 1969 when NASA strapped a big "click me" button on a Hasselblad and every single picture came out perfect... weforum.org/agenda/2019/07…
Hasselblad are very proud of their history, and rightly so. They were the people that made these impossible pictures possible hasselblad.com/about/history/…
Full sun.
No exposure adjustment.
No auto focus.
No viewfinder.
The first point and shoot camera.
Hi resolution, grain free pictures. Every one.
#thankshasselblad
And here is another picture showing the stripped down Hasselblad, full of dust, able to take perfect grain-free pictures with the click of a big button.
The button was big because of the gloves, which expand even more in a vacuum.
Remember too that this is bright sunlight - there are no clouds on the moon. In fact in the daytime the surface temperature is 140 celsius.
They stripped the camera down to save weight.
That enabled them to fit the lunar buggy in the lunar module
#scottiebluepills
The moon buggy itself was a feat of engineering, the tyres were steel mesh only - to withstand the vaccuum and 140 degree heat on the surface. moon.nasa.gov/resources/484/…
It's difficult to make out from the images but in fact the lunar buggy was able to fold up in order to fit into the lunar module.
Just one of many essential firsts required in 1969 to get mad to drive around on the moon.
#scottiebluepills scifacts.net/space/nasas-mo…
The moon buggy was truly amazing. For Apollo 17 the astronauts drove it for 100km with a max speed of 11 km/h.
10 hours driving is exhausting in 140 degree heat. I hope the airconditing was working! moon.nasa.gov/resources/153/…
And the Hasselblad performed brilliantly on all the missions. Here is a close up of the lunar module which fit the lunar buggy, two astronauts, an 8kW 1Mflp computer for guidance and moon rocks. This one is the Apollo 12 version
The 8kW 1megaflop computer was necessary to dock the moon lander travelling at 2000km/h (escape velocity) to the orbiting rocket travelling at 5500km/h (lunar orbit speed) in perpendicular directions.
Taking a picture in such extreme circumstances requires extreme skill
This picture was famously taken through a window of the earlier Apollo 8 mission
The coup de grace of filmography was this famous image of the moonlander travelling towards Apollo 11 to dock.
This iconic image was taken by Michael Collins as he guided the rocket travelling at 5500mk/h away from the moonlander, using a spare camera.
#scottiebluepills
Any that's enough for this trip down memory lane. Hope you enjoyed it. If you find any other high resolution images from 1969 please post them - and remember genuine pictures only please!
*man
*airconditioning
Just one more note in relation to those mesh tyres developed in 1969 that could drive for 100km.
It seems that they were still struggling with the problem in 2017.
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.
To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.
The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.
The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.
Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.
It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".
There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.
This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…
your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.
Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.