Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jan 28, 2023 27 tweets 9 min read Read on X
While the shadowban is strong, I might as well take a trip back in photographic history.

The best photographers taking the highest quality pictures in full sunlight.

In 1968.
gettyimages.com.au/photos/robert-…
Image
These are professional photographers with the best cameras money can buy.

People who have been taking pictures for years.

The grain is testament to the labour required to develop the images from negatives. Image
Manual focus.
Manual exposure.
There was no auto focus or auto exposure on these cameras.

Colour bleeds and grain are authentic. Image
The very best photographers with the very best cameras can't adjust for minor movements which blur the image.
Image
Image
If you have been doing this for years and focus on one place, set the shutter speed very low and have full sun you might get an image like this Image
Or maybe even this. These cars are travelling approximately 200 mph. Image
Thankfully all these difficulties were solved in 1969 when NASA strapped a big "click me" button on a Hasselblad and every single picture came out perfect...
weforum.org/agenda/2019/07…
Hasselblad are very proud of their history, and rightly so. They were the people that made these impossible pictures possible hasselblad.com/about/history/…
Full sun.
No exposure adjustment.
No auto focus.
No viewfinder.
The first point and shoot camera.
Hi resolution, grain free pictures. Every one.
#thankshasselblad Image
And here is another picture showing the stripped down Hasselblad, full of dust, able to take perfect grain-free pictures with the click of a big button.

The button was big because of the gloves, which expand even more in a vacuum.

npr.org/2019/07/13/735…
Image
Remember too that this is bright sunlight - there are no clouds on the moon. In fact in the daytime the surface temperature is 140 celsius.

They stripped the camera down to save weight.
That enabled them to fit the lunar buggy in the lunar module
#scottiebluepills Image
The moon buggy itself was a feat of engineering, the tyres were steel mesh only - to withstand the vaccuum and 140 degree heat on the surface.
moon.nasa.gov/resources/484/…
Image
It's difficult to make out from the images but in fact the lunar buggy was able to fold up in order to fit into the lunar module.

Just one of many essential firsts required in 1969 to get mad to drive around on the moon.
#scottiebluepills
scifacts.net/space/nasas-mo…
The moon buggy was truly amazing. For Apollo 17 the astronauts drove it for 100km with a max speed of 11 km/h.

10 hours driving is exhausting in 140 degree heat. I hope the airconditing was working!
moon.nasa.gov/resources/153/…
Picture courtesy of NASA
And the Hasselblad performed brilliantly on all the missions. Here is a close up of the lunar module which fit the lunar buggy, two astronauts, an 8kW 1Mflp computer for guidance and moon rocks. This one is the Apollo 12 version Astronaut Al Bean removing an experiment at the landing site for Apollo 12 in November 1969.  https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2019/07/12/03-6787_custom-cd644472ed9a852b1aef6bc5000c69fb8fe96bd0-s1300-c85.webp
The 8kW 1megaflop computer was necessary to dock the moon lander travelling at 2000km/h (escape velocity) to the orbiting rocket travelling at 5500km/h (lunar orbit speed) in perpendicular directions.

Taking a picture in such extreme circumstances requires extreme skill
Image
Image
This picture was famously taken through a window of the earlier Apollo 8 mission Image
The coup de grace of filmography was this famous image of the moonlander travelling towards Apollo 11 to dock.

This iconic image was taken by Michael Collins as he guided the rocket travelling at 5500mk/h away from the moonlander, using a spare camera.

#scottiebluepills Image
Any that's enough for this trip down memory lane. Hope you enjoyed it. If you find any other high resolution images from 1969 please post them - and remember genuine pictures only please!
*man
*airconditioning
Just one more note in relation to those mesh tyres developed in 1969 that could drive for 100km.

It seems that they were still struggling with the problem in 2017.

Weird how inventions and progress at NASA goes backwards isn't it?
businessinsider.com/nasa-memory-me…
*km/h
For God's sake let us have the ability to make minor edits to tweets in threads!
*anyway
OMG. He's got a map.
How cool is that?
nasa.gov/image-feature/…
Image
hmmm... someone pointed out that the moonbuggy was stripped.

Just goes to show that your car isn't safe anywhere. Even on the moon.

They even took the steering wheel.Image
Image
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Dec 16
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.

That is the scandal
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.

A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Read 12 tweets
Dec 5
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"

All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see
arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"

oncodaily.com/stories/cathar…
Read 10 tweets
Nov 29
WHOA💥💥💥💥

It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.

Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.

#Spraygate takes a new turn 👇🧵
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.

This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics).
nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"

That stops the chlorine killing off your "MLV" aka engineered virus.
bestvetsolutions.sharepoint.com/Product%20Info…Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 26
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.

To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.

The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.

The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.

Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.

It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".

There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.

This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews.
cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…

@PGtzsche1 @MaryanneDemasi @SenatorAntic @DrJulieSladden @Fynnderella1 @missyTHX1138 @RWMaloneMD @RetsefL @BrokenTruthTV @RMConservativeImage
Image
"Scotland HPV vaccine study flawed" - explaining how the Scotland data on HPV was misrepresented to show an effect that wasn't real

blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-hpv-vacc…
How "real world data" papers claim to use electronic health records data but can't be verified and in many cases are not even real.

@ClareCraigPath
#Surgisphere #Penngate #EMRgate
arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Read 4 tweets
Nov 24
Thank you @davidbahry...

your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.

@Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463121/Image
Image
@DavidBahry @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden Paper here
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463121/
@DavidBahry @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden Pro metastatic impact of chronic cGAS-STING activation
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 22
WHOA!

Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.

You just can't make this stuff up. Image
Image
Image
Image
Receipts - Quandt family values
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2…
More on the Quandts
medium.com/the-collector/…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(