The late Littauer had remarked in her landmark review of chariot petroglyphs: "One cannot help wondering if, no matter what other ends it may eventually have served, this type of rendering of a vehicle was not first suggested to the artist by looking down into a tomb...
The petroglyphs she was talking about are from the Poltavka-Sintashta-Andronovo horizons & zones influenced by them. The tombs she was referring to re the chariot burials that appear in the Sintashta horizon & continue to the steppe-I-Ir influenced Shang age of what became China
The chariot burial is that drawn by von Dewall in from Shang age burial. Thus, it seems that ratha-s depicted in Mongolian steppe are from a time when instead of an actual burial the deceased ratheShTha was commemorated by a petroglyph that resembled the original chariot burial
Now evidence for that comes from Pamirs enroute to the subcontinent, where on a high mountain there is a funerary site with a chariot petroglyph found by Soviet researchers. The significance of ithyphallic depictions is unclear. On the other hand in Mongolia we have petroglyphs
showing carts/ in profiles (Below Jamani Us, Mongolian Altai). Other animals in the scenes with peculiar chariot rendering are shown normally in profile. Hence, this "in tomb" was probably a specific convention associated with a funerary rite. While the Harappans TMK show no cart
burials, there has much excitement in this decade about the famous Sinauli burial. We dont think it was a chariot or horse-drawn vehicle. However, it is notable as the first cart burial in the subcontinent - a solid wheel cart with design features overlapping with steppe chariots
Hence, we believe that Sinauli clinging to one end of the OCP/Cu-hoard culture was a sign of Aryan influence among late Harappans if not actual presence of Aryans in the subcontinent. The Indian chariot depictions from the OCP/Cu-hoard period are clearly related to the steppe
petroglyph conventions, suggesting that at least 1 wave of Arya-s brought it relatively unchanged to India. Below is the e.g., from Chibbar Nulla, Mandsor. Some convention& notably shows warriors with radiating hair like figures in Omno Gov, Mongolia. The axe is characteristic of
the axes found in Cu-hoard/OCP sites clinching their connection. Thus, by the core OCP the Aryans were already spread widely in India. The Shivpuri site famously shows the Harappan horned deity on a ratha, but note that here the chariot is not in the "in tomb" view, implying a
different significance for this depiction. Whatever that might be, it is a rare indicator of the Harappan incorporation into the new Aryan system of the Cu-hoard/OCP. Finally, in the Jorwe-Daimabad culture we have a depiction of "in tomb" view of a bullock cart, which might be a
parallel for the Sinauli cart burial. Given how vast the Sinauli site is, & the fact it was discovered so recently suggests that more may be buried under the densely populated Northern Indian interfluves with much implications for the Late Harappan- Aryan transition.
A chariot petroglyph from Balochistan (Left) and Slovakia (Right ~1400 BCE): similar styles.
The Slovakian version is inscribed on a pot with plant looking like Ephedra
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In some parts of the world aDNA studies have become a matter of fact tool for reconstructing lost history like this massive study of the Avar Khaghanate individuals from Hungary. Like the earlier study it shows the tale of "Mongols" before the Chingizids nature.com/articles/s4158…
It seems the East Asian component of the Avars in the west can be modeled best with Late Xiongnu& certain Xianbei (Serbi) individuals. We take the Xiongnu to be early members of the Mongolic branch, while as Shimunek demonstrated Xianbei to be early members of the Serbi branch of
Serbi-Mongolian (Serbi = para-Mongolic). When the Serib Khaghanate rose it incorporated several elements of the Xiongnu Hun Shanyuate into it. The Rouran Khaghanate that arose upon the disintegration of the Serbi, it was likely led by a Mongolic group. Even the name Mongol might
The early Arya-s imagined the tumulus (kurgan) as a shelter with the "mother" - i.e. earth. This is clarified in the tR^icha deployed for the funerary rite of the piling of the kurgan, i.e. shmashAna:
uch Chva~nchasva pR^ithivi mA ni bAdhathAH sUpAyanAsmai bhava sUpava~nchanA |
uchChva~nchamAnA pR^ithivI su tiShThatu sahasram mita upa hi shrayantAm |
gR^ihAso ghR^itashchuto bhavantu vishvAhAsmai sharaNAH santv atra ||
~May the earth stand piled high above him; verily upheld by a 1000 props. May it be
the house dripping with ghee; Through eternity may he be sheltered here! Truly that shelter on the steppe has been a great mechanism to understand our pitaraH.
The Israeli program to make best use of the high cognitive capacity of their people
Such a plan might work to some degree even among peoples with much lower pop. density of cognitive capacity but what they may lack is the necessary cohesion
via @Rjrasvapalladiummag.com/2024/01/26/the…
Many of the cognitive elite& their descendants who played a key role in the Soviet Rus programs moved Isr & added mental muscle to their capacity in the 1990s.
I'll mention one admittedly anecdotal case: met an individual who had served in the above. He was politically a mild guy: was ready to concede 2-state solution, wanted to sign treaties with the Mohds, was quite critical of his own politicians etc. An equivalent H guy would be
A 🧵on interdigitation in IE branches. 1 of the offshoots of the recent archaeogenetic work is the developing view that Greek- (Greco-Armenian) sprang directly out of Yamnaya, with Greeks sojourning in the upper Balkans before reaching the peninsula& islands. This is consistent
with certain linguistic (word) trees that favor an early branching of Greek (Greco-Armenian) after the basal most branches Anatolian & Tocharian. But until not long ago there was an alternative or partly overlapping linguistic hypothesis of Greco-Armeno-Aryan. Was that signal
entirely illusory or was there something to it that is still relevant. It has 3 dimensions: 1. Certain isoglosses; 2. Certain literary usages; 3. Certain seemingly apomorphic mythological elements. The linguists who see it as illusory generally take these shared features as
🧵Some "great books" for H educational reading with some comments 1. Excerpts from the 4 shruti-s & their a~Nga-s (I know many would go apoplectic with this suggestion: I see your point) 2. vedA~Nga-jyotiSha with numerical examples& practical observations of the sky
3. kaNAda's sUtra-s w commentarial material 4. excerpts from jaimini' sUtra-s with glosses 5. pata~njali's yogasUtra-s w vyAs-abhAShya 6. excerpts from itihAsa-s & harivaMsha 7. excerpts from proto-skandapurANa 8. readings from mAlinIvijaya, nishvAsa, netra, lakShmI, pauShkara
9. kumArasaMbhava 10. kAmasUtra of vAtsyAyana (I understand some people might object) 11. kauTilIya arthashAstra 12. readings from charaka, sushruta, vAgbhaTa & kAshyapa saMhitA. 13. e.g.s from the AryabhaTIya -- at least work out of kuTTaka & sine tables.
The ancient world, unlike many neo-occidentally conditioned folks, recognized that leadership of men was related to something special -- it could be seen as a the charisma seen only in a true leader. That's why we have approximately equivalent words: Skt: shrI; Iranic: Xvarena,
Turkic: kut, Mongolic: suu, Chinese: yun, Arabic: dawlat. That it cuts across religions and ethnicities in Eurasia indicates that it is something primal.Even the Austronesia Maoris had something called mana. At times of stress nation can only be led by men with that special thing
Despite the neo-occidental conditioning, one can see that the pull of this special charisma exists to date in the west. It is something an oligarchy deep state greatly fears for it would transfer the mandate from their shadow government to the "ekavIra". The word ekavIra is an