The late Littauer had remarked in her landmark review of chariot petroglyphs: "One cannot help wondering if, no matter what other ends it may eventually have served, this type of rendering of a vehicle was not first suggested to the artist by looking down into a tomb...
The petroglyphs she was talking about are from the Poltavka-Sintashta-Andronovo horizons & zones influenced by them. The tombs she was referring to re the chariot burials that appear in the Sintashta horizon & continue to the steppe-I-Ir influenced Shang age of what became China
The chariot burial is that drawn by von Dewall in from Shang age burial. Thus, it seems that ratha-s depicted in Mongolian steppe are from a time when instead of an actual burial the deceased ratheShTha was commemorated by a petroglyph that resembled the original chariot burial
Now evidence for that comes from Pamirs enroute to the subcontinent, where on a high mountain there is a funerary site with a chariot petroglyph found by Soviet researchers. The significance of ithyphallic depictions is unclear. On the other hand in Mongolia we have petroglyphs
showing carts/ in profiles (Below Jamani Us, Mongolian Altai). Other animals in the scenes with peculiar chariot rendering are shown normally in profile. Hence, this "in tomb" was probably a specific convention associated with a funerary rite. While the Harappans TMK show no cart
burials, there has much excitement in this decade about the famous Sinauli burial. We dont think it was a chariot or horse-drawn vehicle. However, it is notable as the first cart burial in the subcontinent - a solid wheel cart with design features overlapping with steppe chariots
Hence, we believe that Sinauli clinging to one end of the OCP/Cu-hoard culture was a sign of Aryan influence among late Harappans if not actual presence of Aryans in the subcontinent. The Indian chariot depictions from the OCP/Cu-hoard period are clearly related to the steppe
petroglyph conventions, suggesting that at least 1 wave of Arya-s brought it relatively unchanged to India. Below is the e.g., from Chibbar Nulla, Mandsor. Some convention& notably shows warriors with radiating hair like figures in Omno Gov, Mongolia. The axe is characteristic of
the axes found in Cu-hoard/OCP sites clinching their connection. Thus, by the core OCP the Aryans were already spread widely in India. The Shivpuri site famously shows the Harappan horned deity on a ratha, but note that here the chariot is not in the "in tomb" view, implying a
different significance for this depiction. Whatever that might be, it is a rare indicator of the Harappan incorporation into the new Aryan system of the Cu-hoard/OCP. Finally, in the Jorwe-Daimabad culture we have a depiction of "in tomb" view of a bullock cart, which might be a
parallel for the Sinauli cart burial. Given how vast the Sinauli site is, & the fact it was discovered so recently suggests that more may be buried under the densely populated Northern Indian interfluves with much implications for the Late Harappan- Aryan transition.
A chariot petroglyph from Balochistan (Left) and Slovakia (Right ~1400 BCE): similar styles.
The Slovakian version is inscribed on a pot with plant looking like Ephedra

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with manasataramgini

manasataramgini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blog_supplement

Jan 27
1 of the enduring mysteries of Bronze Age Mongolia is the Bayan Olgy complex with humanoid figures with insect antennae & wings(?)
While its genetics emains unknown to me Sintashta, Yamnaya, BMAC derived ancestries have been found in the general vicinity in the period. The ibex
figure is over a thousand years later in the tamgha of the Ashina clan of the Turkic Khaghanate. There are also depictions of both skiers & horsemen.
To the south of this region Andronovan chariots riding among herds of deer are depicted
Read 10 tweets
Jan 26
A f3-statistic network for selected Eurasians with an emphasis on the Turkic & Mongolic groups. The Munkh Khairkhan culture folks from around 1800-1900 BCE show very Mongolian ancestry while being contemporary to Sintashta-derived populations in the vicinity. While Arkhangai had Image
Sintashta successor groups well into the Hunnic age. At least one Munkh Khairkhan shows signs of small IE-derived admixture though the original authors did not report it. That shows up as the edges to Chemurchek & Arkhangai from the 1st Hun (Xiongnu) Khaghanate.
The Munkh Khairkhan culture in Mongolia from ~1800-1900 BCE is characterized by a barrow that might have housed 1 or more human remains that was shaped quite like the dakShiNAgni altar of the H. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 22
Invocation of nAga-s for rain-inducing rituals is common in the bauddha world & in early shaiva rituals like that preserved in the jayadrathayAmala. However, later it became muted or entirely lost in the H world while continuing in the saugatan sphere. 1 of the earliest surviving
nAga rites for rain-making in the bauddha world is that deploying a mantra known as the mUlamantra. The ritual is said to involve pratiShTha of an image of a nAga followed by the ritual performed by a vidyAdhara for weather control -rain or its modulation in case of an excess.
The roots of the rain-making ritual are mysterious but we posit that they originate from the "water" incantations to ahi budhnya mentioned in the RV itself & also metaphorically but indicated in the taittirIya saMhitA.
nU rodasI ahinA budhnyena
stuvIta devI apyebhir iShTaiH |
Read 5 tweets
Jan 22
sUkta RV 7.34 is replete with riddles similar to the sUkta of father manu from maNDala 8. We believe the deities riddled in the below R^ik-s are marut-s
uta na eShu nR^iShu shravo dhuH
pra rAye yantu shardhanto aryaH ||
tapanti shatruM svar Na bhUmA
mahAsenAso amebhir eShAm ||
If so, it would present the epithet mahAsena (here in plural) shared with skanda in the singular.
The word mahAsena is a hapax in the R^igveda & practically a hapax across the core vaidika texts (barring the late insertion, the taittirIya AraNyaka skanda-gAyatrI). However, in the mahAbharata it occurs 38 times. The vast majority of occurrences are as an epithet of skanda
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
👍 I'm glad to have Harappan genetic heritage -- believe it was largely good stuff for the modern urban world. However, beyond that, &some mundane typically Indian food habits, it remains mute behind a veil. What really matters to our identity is IEan in provenance
Being an older person, I can reminisce a bit: Before molecular data 1 really could not be sure of the affinities of the greater Harappan peoples. One could infer, given the obvious phenotypic differences vis-a-vis the Europeans, that they had likely contributed to Indian ancestry
But how & how much was still unclear. Similarly, on the other side, we could not be precise about the timing & the tempo of the Aryan invasion(s) -- massive conquest vs migration vs mere linguistic influence. When the 1st molecular data on extant peoples became available they
Read 21 tweets
Jan 11
A useful exercise in comparative history is to compare the last H empire, that of the marAThA-s, to the Chingizid Mongol empire. While separated in time by several centuries, they had certain similar approaches, problems, and the solutions 1. The issue of succession after the
founder was badly handled among the marAThA but better handled among the Mongols:
manasataramgini.wordpress.com/2018/08/31/a-b…
In the later phase the marAThA-s had relatively good run of the kokanastha prime ministers while the chingizids suffered many succession issues. In some ways the struggle
of raghunAtha rAv & the main line was paralled by Arik Boke, Qaidu and Dua's struggle as counter-Khans with the main line. All in all the Initial succession issues after the Chatrapati's death set back the marAThA-s much more than anything the Mongols faced till Quibilai.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(