I believe Chris Grant handled George Santos’s campaign. Shocked to hear he has ties to Roger Stone protege Michael Caputo. Yes, I’m being sarcastic. 1/
7/ It’s a lot easier to make these connections once u realize that all roads involving political corruption lead to Roger Stone. Which is why I’ve embarked on this three-part series for @BucksCoBeacon. buckscountybeacon.com/2023/01/roger-…
13/ The hard part about writing about Roger Stone & his network of miscreants is that there is far too much important material. buckscountybeacon.com/2023/01/roger-…
Tech billionaire Mark Andreessen is invested in Prospera, a for profit “startup up city” in Honduras. He’s now advising DOGE & hanging with Trump who has embraced the idea “freedom cities.” Here’s how things turned out in Honduras…. 1/ #NetworkStates insideclimatenews.org/news/15092024/…
Tech billionaire Mark Andreessen is invested in Prospera, a “for profit” startup up city in Honduras. He’s now advising DOGE & hanging with Trump who has embraced the idea “freedom cities.” Here’s how things turned out in Honduras…. 1/
Wowza. Those of us who study the Theo Bros have long suspected a financial connection between them & the Tech Bros, but were unable to find it. @ForbesTech just did. The connection is thru Marc Andreessen who advises DOGE & New Founding (led by Nate Fischer & Josh Abbottoy). 1/
3/ I have posted about Nate Fischer and his organizations (New Founding & American Reformer) many, many times. He leads the Dallas chapter of the Society for American Civic Renewal, a Christian only men’s society founded by Charles Haywood.
Surprise, surprise. At Princeton, Pete Hegseth studied under Robert George, a close associate of SCOTUS puppet master Leonard Leo. The two of them apparently remained in touch. 1/ dailyprincetonian.com/article/2024/1…
😳 Tech billionaire Marc Andreessen is reportedly getting involved w/ DOGE. He’s also invested in the “network state” movement led by Balaji Srinivasan, which aims 2 build crypto-based countries w/in existing states via the creation of “parallel institutions” like X. Listen. 1/
This is maddening. Speaking of the 2004 election in Ohio, John Kerry told Brian Lehrer in 2018 that “The problem for us was we were doubting whether the [voting] machines themselves had been appropriately measured & whether the algorithms were correct, etc. We challenged that ahead of time by the way. People don’t know that. And we were told by the court that we were not able to get that algorithm, to check it, bc it was proprietary information.
And I believe that it was absolutely incorrect that in the United States of America, the election for the presidency of the United States should somehow be the purview of privately owned machines where the public doesn’t have the right to know whether the algorithms can be checked or whether they are hackable or not. And we now know they are hackable.
But we knew as we sat there to decide where to go in terms of the challenge, that we were a nation at war, we had just been through a Supreme Court test of an election four years earlier. I thought once I measured it that whatever constitutional challenge we brought or whatever appropriate challenge we brought to the ballots that were counted, it was going to wind up ultimately in the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court would do the same thing that it did before. We would take the country through a three month exercise with a 5/4 decision that would award the presidency back to George Bush.
Now some people may think that’s the right thing to have done. I thought it would have been horrendous for our country one year into a war, at that moment when there were serious doubts about terrorism and other things, to be going through a long period of questioning of the presidency, and I didn’t think it was the right thing to do for the nation.” 1/ @VP @marceelias