British Army soldiers are some of the best in the world... but 90% of their equipment sucks!
I.e. the Warrior IFVs and Scimitar recon vehicles have ancient, unstabilized cannons that need to be reloaded BY HAND with 3 (!) round clips. 1/4
For decades the British governments refused to properly fund the army... and so British armoured formations use now mostly antiques:
FV432: 60 years old
CVR(T): 53 years
Warrior: 37 years
Only the Challenger 2 tank and AS-90 self-propelled howitzers are still acceptable...
2/4
but both need urgently new turrets. The Challenger is getting one and the AS-90 turret is in production in Poland for the AHS Krab.
But as long as British governments refuse to finance the British Army properly, the army will have to continue shrinking personnel and equipment
3/4
Two years ago I wrote an article, and @nicholadrummond dared to publish it, how the British Army needs a complete overhaul of its organization and procurement... it's all more urgent now. So: fund the British Army @RishiSunak!
German submarines and frigates for Ukraine? Forget it.
1) On 27 February Turkey closed the Straits for warships. If you want a submarine or frigate for Ukraine to pass them, you will also reopen the Straits for russian warships - i.e. a the cruiser Varyag, which the russians 1/6
tried for months to get into the Black Sea as replacement for the Moskva. 2) and if you get Turkey to reopen the Straits, the russians will know EXACTLY when the Ukrainian ship passes & will be waiting with a fleet and fighters on the Black Sea side = good bye Ukrainian ship.
2/n
3) yes, you can send ships over the Rhine–Main–Danube Canal, if their draft is less than 4 meters and if they are not higher than 6 meters above the water line, or the first bridge will stop you... and you need Hungary (!) and Serbia (!!) to agree to let you use the Danube.
3/n
Earlier I posted a thread about how Abrams, Leopard & Challenger, and Bradley, Marder & CV90 combine with infantry and armored support vehicles during an combined arms attack.
As people asked about the supporting & sustainment elements of a combined arms attack I will do now
1/25
a thread about these.
Please read my earlier thread before continuing with this one. Here I will give you a very rough overview of the elements an armored brigade or division staff has to plan, prepare and execute for a successful armored attack.
Soon Challenger 2, Leopard 2A5/6 and M1A1/2 Abrams will roam across the Ukrainian steppe to hunt and destroy russian armor.
All three are leagues better than what the russians field, but tanks on their own are useless. So, an easy to understand thread about combined arms 🧵: 1/n
Western tanks like the M1A1/2 Abrams, Challenger 2, Leopard 2A5/6/7, Leclerc, Ariete AMV, Merkava IV, K2 Black Panther have way better armor than russian tanks.
An M1A2 Abrams is visibly larger than i.e. a T-72 or a T-80, and weighs (depending on model) 15-20 tons more. 2/n
That extra weight is mostly armor. russian tanks are not able to penetrate the front armor of modern Western tanks at distances of 2 km (because the armor is twice as thick as what russian APFSDS projectiles can penetrate).
Photo of a Strv 122 APFSDS training round, which 3/n
Before I continue: do you know how NATO 155mm howitzers work? If not, please read my earlier thread about the M777 howitzer.
Once you know how the M777 works (and what primer, fuzes, and charges are), then you will easily understand this thread.
The M109A6 Paladin is the sixth modification of the M109, which was introduced in 1963.
It's a good system, but AS-90, CAESAR, CAESAR 8x8, Archer, PzH 2000, AHS Krab, and Zuzana 2 are all better systems.
The Paladin still uses a 39 caliber barrel and thus has an 18 liter 3/n
People forget that all US M1A1 and M1A2 Abrams tanks in service with or stored by the US Army are filled with a ton of depleted uranium (DU).
Every Abrams built after 1 October 1988 has a DU mesh between its steel and ceramic armor plates. The US won't give those tanks to 1/4
anyone. The M1A1 without DU mesh were sold years ago to Australia, Iraq, Kuwait, Morocco & Saudi Arabia.
The problem is that the mesh is top secret. Not even the workers building the Abrams at the Lima Tank Plant get to see it. It comes from a classified government facility
2/4
and is enclosed in steel (1st, 2nd generation) or carbon (3rd generation). Workers only insert the plates into the Abrams. Export Abrams are taken apart completely so that the DU mesh plates can be replaced by Tungsten plates... and that takes weeks.
I am sure the German
3/4
Sweden acquired 355 CV90 IFVs (+ 194 support variants). The 355 CV90 come in eight versions. The main versions are:
• 9040A (pic 1)
• 9040B/B1 (pic 2)
• 9040C/C+ (pic 3)
The photos everyone is posting are actually the CV90 MkIV for Slovakia (pic 4) 1/n
The three main versions are currently being upgraded:
Ukraine won't get C/C+/E, because Sweden has 145 and 143 should be in use with eleven mechanized companies.
Btw. this version is easy to recognize as the coaxial 2/n
machine gun has been removed and replaced by a machine gun on top of the tank's turret (see the photo with the firing machine gun).
There are 44 9040B/B1/D2 in Swedish inventory. I don't know if they are being used, but those would be an ideal package to send to Ukraine. 3/n