In my third data update for 2023, I look at what 2022 brought to the bond market, which was mostly pain, and how increasing rates on both treasuries and corporate bonds made it a record-breaking bad year for bond investors. bit.ly/3wFlqbk
US treasuries were anything but a safe haven as treasury rates rose across the board, but more so at the short end of the maturity spectrum than at the long end, causing the yield curve to invert. bit.ly/3JsDU6M
If you are tempted to blame the Fed, don't. The real culprit was inflation, with the Fed (and other central bankers) playing, at best, supporting roles. bit.ly/40e8sz2
The surge in long term rates translated into a large price drop and negative returns. In 2022, the nominal return on a 10-year T.Bond of -17.83% & a real return of -22.79%, the worst year for treasury bond investors in the last 95 years. bit.ly/3Rkiiev
With stock & bond returns considered in tandem, it was only one of five years, in the last 95, where both were negative, and the first year where both equity and bond markets had negative returns that exceeded -10%. bit.ly/3Rkiiev
Rising rates on treasuries pushed up corporate bond rates, but during 2022, corporate bond default spreads also widened, and more so on the lowest rated bonds, creating a secondary effect. bit.ly/3HHY1wh
The increase in corporate bond rates meant that corporate bond investors, even in investment grade bonds, saw their worst negative returns in history, with the damage widening at the lower ratings. bit.ly/3wFlqbk
Incorporating the rise on cost of equity during the year into the assessment, the median cost of capital for US (global) companies went up to 9.63% (10.60%) from 5.77% (6.33%) at the start of the year.bit.ly/3wFlqbk
That rise in the cost of capital will not only affect investors but also change the investing, financing and dividend policies of companies, with fewer investments passing muster, more cash returned to shareholders & changes in debt policy. bit.ly/3wFlqbk
Looking forward, the key driver for interest rates in 2023 will not be the Fed, but fundamentals, with inflation and the real economy determining where treasury rates and default spreads go during the year: bit.ly/3wFlqbk
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Sugar Daddy (or Molasses Mommy) is a bounteous benefactor who funds your needs, making you incapable of self-reliance. I use it to explain why corporate venture capital, sovereign wealth funds and green investing punch well below their weights. bit.ly/48mZFzj
In the aggregate, these groupings control immense and growing funding, under perform relative to their conventional peers (VC for CVC, active funds for SWF and energy companies/investors for green companies.funds) and often face no accountability. bit.ly/48mZFzj
The best players within the assured funding groupings, though, match up much well with the best investors in the conventional groupings, and and they tend to more independent, more transparent and clearer about their core and side missions. bit.ly/48mZFzj
The DOJ has targeted Alphabet for a break-up and data sharing. While that may be a negotiating strategy to extract concessions, big tech has been in the crosshairs of regulators and politicians for being "too big". My thoughts: bit.ly/3NzRlmb
To understand why antitrust laws will be a reach, in the big tech context, it is worth looking at the law's evolution, from the Sherman Act (aimed at the robber baron trusts) of 1890 to the Clayton Act of 1914, and the addendums since. bit.ly/3NzRlmb
The enforcement of antitrust laws has ebbed and flowed, as administrations change and courts come up with new tests, but mostly because of the key question of whether the end game is to protect consumers or to enhance competition. bit.ly/3NzRlmb
Staying with my life cycle theme, the most difficult part to navigate for both managers and investors is the "growing old" phase. I look at Intel and Walgreens facing that choice, and Starbucks feeling the middle age blues. bit.ly/4cZeuIT
The market has turned sour on all three companies, as they have all delivered sub-par returns over the last 5 years. Hiring a new CEO seems to have brought some euphoria back at Starbucks, but is it overdone? bit.ly/4cZeuIT
Intel, a tech superstar for much of its life, is a textbook case of aging, as revenue growth has scaled down. Until the last three years, margins stayed robust, but that is no longer the case. With its investments in the Foundry and AI chips, the company is trying, but is it trying too hard? bit.ly/4cZeuIT
Nvidia's much-anticipated earnings report last week contained dazzling performance numbers and beat expectations, but Nvidia has dropped almost 17% since it came out. I look at the expectations game that may help explain the disconnect: bit.ly/3XyrwJ5
Deconstructing the earnings release, the company seems almost too good to be true: triple digit revenue growth (year-on-year), amazing unit economics and sustained economies of scale, but just not as good as they were last quarter. bit.ly/3XyrwJ5
The numbers do represent a slowing in growth, a leveling off in margins and sobering guidance about the future. The report beat expectations but by less than in prior quarters.. In short, Nvidia set standards so high that it came up short. bit.ly/3XyrwJ5
On the day that Nvidia has the market's attention, and AI is the talk of the town, I look at the personal disruption (to you work and jobs) that is likely to come from AI, and what you can do to stay ahead of the game. bit.ly/3X7dXi8
Whether you want it or not, there is a bot out there with your name on it, that is conspiring to do your job for you. The threat is greater if your job is mechanical (vs intuitive), rules-based (vs principle-based) and leaves no room for judgment or bias. bit.ly/3X7dXi8
That threat is real for me, since almost everything I write, teach or say is in public domain, and there is a Damodaran Bot that has assimilated all of it. The race is on, and I hope to come out ahead, but there are no guarantees. bit.ly/3X7dXi8
I do all my classroom teaching in the spring, but if you are interested in taking my classes, and have the time, I have free online versions of my core classes (corporate finance, valuation, investment philosophies) as well as lead in skillsets. bit.ly/3tPhYNA
Clicking on the class links will take you to the webpage for each of the classes, and you can see what the classes will cover in detail. Check out a session or two, if you feel uncertain. bit.ly/3tPhYNA
If you want a sequencing of these classes, in terms of material and end game, the chart below gives you my perspective, but feel free to bend it to your needs.