RUSSIAN BIOLAB FAKE INFORMATION
This thread exposes an elaborate effort to try to argue that the US is providing aid to UKR to cover up US-sponsored bioweapons labs in UKR. This is easily proven a scam. Please bookmark this and retweet it./1 @threadreaderapp unroll
All the photos in the tweet try to portray a bioweapons cache. Your warning light should flash anytime a photo is not sourced. That is the case here, as the photo has nothing to do with bioweapons. It does not even look like bioweapons/2
In fact, this is a photo from a highly publicized visit by Senator Obama as a part of a US-UKR program to destroy old Soviet CONVENTIONAL weapons:/3 dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2…
The site is the Donestsk Chemical Plant located in the city of the same name. The area has been occupied by Russia since 2014. No tangible evidence of any bioweapon there was ever produced, a result that could be expected from what they manufactured./4
Moreover, the allegation that the US supported UKR to cover-up this is a bit ridiculous, since it was already in Russian possession for eight years. A bit late for a "cover-up."/5
The other major document in the Russian thread is a Zellensky memo supposedly ordering destruction of bioweapon documents. This has been debunked for months due to the numerous mistakes in the fake image:/6 euvsdisinfo.eu/report/zelensk…
The balance of the thread uses information that proves nothing but is spun to try to re-enforce this narrative. Too weak to bother to comment here. The allegations are nonsensical./7
Some logical issues also arise: Russia is hardly a champion in the war to fight bioweapon use or development. Remember that Russia is widely regarded as secretly continuing bioweapon work in violation of the internatl treaty:/8 thebulletin.org/2022/10/the-ru…
We should also recall Russia supporting and facilitating Assad's use of chemical weapons on civilians in Syria:/9 aljazeera.com/news/2021/6/4/…
"Despite Russian and Syrian efforts to bury the truth of what happened in Khan Shaykhun," the internatl agency was able to prove the use of sarin gas on civilians. /10 armscontrol.org/act/2021-09/fe…
Russia itself has used chemical weapons: "Russia has used chemical weapons during past conflicts, notably in Chechnya and Syria, in violation of international law." /12 news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/…
Russia has "used small amounts of chemical weapons in assassinations or assassination attempts against dissidents, both in Russia, against Alexey Navalny, and in the U.K., against Sergei and Yulia Skripal." /13 news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/…
Going back to the 2005 trip by Obama(D) and Lugar(R), they did visit an old SOVIET lab that contained anthrax and other bioweapon material. The purpose of the visit - and the result- was the destruction of this material./14 obamaspeeches.com/036-Non-Prolif…
So the entire notion of the US funding bioweapon labs in UKR - totally debunked for months- is a classic Russian propaganda lie./15 leadstories.com/hoax-alert/202…
They typically take known information and widely distort it to prove a narrative totally at odds with reality. Russia is hardly a means to reduce the threat of bioweapons, but is part of the threat itself as proven by its past experience./16
Climate changes geographically over the earth's history take many decades. So an historical trend would be the best evidence, not one year's events. There is no global wild fire trend.
Alarmists tell us that global climate change will raise precipiation causing flooding but also lower precipitation causing droughts. Neither is actuallhy happening.
There are two Russian armies fighting in their invasion of Ukraine. There is the "second army" of the world with massive numbers of tanks and artillery pieces and soldiers that march with precision on Red Square and look like recruiting posters. This army is supported by a massive industrial base making "near peer" equipment at elevated rates.
Then there is another Russian army invading Ukraine. This one has lost 90% of its professional soldiers ("lifers" in US jargon). It is now filled with soldiers with 30 days or less training. Its officer corps depleted to a frction of the pre-war level. Never well-trained in manuever war or combined arms, this army uses clumsy tactics with little or no situational awareness. Vehicle drivers run over their own troops or into their own minefields. This army's generals order small unit attacks over and over again on the same avenues of approach that were dominated by the enemy the day before.
This second Russian army has blown through a massive amount of its first-line equipment. Older T62s from decades ago are seen in its formations and loss columns, because the first line T80/T72 modern versions are becoming scarce. This army's air defesne has proven far less capable than its published specifcations and has been pciked apart by droens and anti-radiation missiles. Self-propelled artillery seen in vast numbers on paper before the invasion are now repalced with ancvient D30 towed guins, vulnerable to counter-battery fire and drones.
The second army is the real one. The first army is the myth that Putin may still nourish, but - more importantly- the delusion that drives Western media to claim the war is a "stalemate" or that Russia can fight a long-war as it grows "stronger" deploying non-existent modern equipment and trained troops. The first zdrmy only appears in RedSquare films. The second one shows up in daily clips from the battlefield. THese clips seldom reported or published in Westgern popular media.
The same media - ignorant of the battlefield reality- dutifully reports the lines on the map and concludes there is a stalemate. It feeds a narrative that more "resistance is futile" (Russians are the Borg).
The scenario for the first army described is that Russia will never give up its occupied territories without a fight to the bitter end. The second army has lost effective control of Sevastapol and is losing its land bridge to Crimea due to long-range artillery fire and partisan warfare. In this real world scenario, Russia has lost much of its basic war objectives and is relying entirely on a political effort to break Western will to supply Ukraine.
The Russian losses, verified by third-parties, in the real world are staggering and accelrating. These have consumed the best Russian equipment and their best troops.
The comments below have links to multiple sources and information describing this "second Russian army" - the real one. It is clear that Russia's only hope is to break Western will, which cannot be allowed to happen. Ukraine does not need a piece of paper that crates "peace" (they alreayd got one of those in Budapest). Ukraine just needs ammo, as Presdient Zellensky famously said. #RussiaLosingBadly
#UkraineMustWin
Why are Republicans holding out for border securty before agreeing to fund Ukraine? This post will not try to justify that position, but will explain it. 1. GOP members of Congress have voted by wide margins for Ukraine aid in all "stand alone" votes. thehill.com/policy/defense…
2. Republican chairmen and ranking members of the key committees have urged faster and more effective aid as well as a clear policy goal of Ukraine winning. foxnews.com/politics/inter…
3. On the other hand, even with majorities in the past, they have not done enough to secure the border. Since President Biden entered the White House approximately 9.5 million migrants have illegally entered the United States.
Russian in Losing Badly Part 3
This is an update on all of the evience that Russian is losing badly right now.
Frantic efforts to try to get a ceasefire. The Russians are pushing for it, not Ukraine. /1 x.com/EmekaGift100/s…
Major advances pose breakthrough opportunity in the south. Russia loses operational effectiveness of Sevastapol. Russian artillery takes a poounding and is keeps getting worse./2 x.com/Tendar/status/…
NATO equipment crushes Russians. Bradleys. Go to minute 1:30/3
The DESCENT of Heritage Foundation To Become Russian Propaganda
Founded in the Reagan era, Heritage Foundation has been a major voice for his foreign policy and defense principles. This continued in the Ukraine war, until it changed dramatically./1
“Timidity, fear, & hesitancy incentivize aggression and worsen the consequences of war……half measures and tepid, delayed assistance lengthen the duration of conflict, increase the amount of destruction, add to suffering, & make war harder to end.” HF website, March 15, 2023./2
Heritage Foundation, website, February 14, 2023:/3
How the Heritage Foundation became a pro-Russian force.
You may have seen their TV ad that supports cutting off US aid to Ukraine, a major objective of Putin and the only possible way Russia can even get a "draw" out of the war. So let's start with how phony the ad is./1
The aid starts the full 7 yr authorization figure for Ukraine to create a big number that is makes absurd comparisons to Hawaii initital FEMA aid. The annual number is small & declining each yr. It is mostly spent in US, creating jobs to replace & update the donated eqpt./2
Heritage shifted to a claim that the aid is not accounted for. A blatant lie which plays on low information voters' fears and bias. Totally crap and Heritage must know it!/3