Gordon Glogau Profile picture
Jan 31 26 tweets 10 min read
The origin story of UKG offers a rare opportunity to unpack various interesting dynamics to me both as an ex-M&A deal practitioner & HR industry participant:

✅ Public company M&A deal dynamics
✅ Public company M&A deal dynamics
#HR & #HCM strategy/trends

Let's dive in!🧵
This🧵will include the following components to help guide how this "all-in-one" HCM was formed & the go-forward path

1⃣ Ultimate Software Refresher
2⃣ Kronos Refresher
3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like
6⃣ Summary takeaways
1⃣ Ultimate Software Refresher

🟢 Founded in 1990

🟢 IPO'd in 1998

🟢 "All-in-one" HCM SaaS platform (UltiPro)

🟢 Payroll & HR *fulcrum*

🟢 Enterprise focus (>2.5K EEs)

🟢 ~6K customers (~50m EEs)

🟢 ~$1.5bn rev. & ~6K FTEs

🟢 LBO'd by H&F-led group in '20 (more to come)
2⃣ Kronos Refresher

🔴 Founded in 1997

🔴 IPO'd in 1992

🔴 Enterprise-grade time & attendance (incl.⏰) via Dimensions, Central & Ready

🔴 LBO'd in 2007 (by H&F)

🔴 Recap'd in 2014 (Blackstone, GIC & JMI)

🔴 ~$1.5bn in rev. & ~6K FTEs

🔴 ~16K customers (w/ ~40m EEs)
3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics - Kronos

'07: H&F & JMI LBO'd Kronos for $1.8bn (~$750m equity check)

'07 to '14: Kronos returned ~$2.0bn+ via various *dividend recaps*

'14: H&F & JMI sold 42% to BX & GIC for ~$750m

~5x (cashed out + upside) over 7 years ain't bad amid GFC
3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics - Ultimate

2/19: H&F-led investor group (BX, GIC, CPPIB, JMI) LBO'd $ULTI for ~$11bn ($331.50/sh = 32% premium to 30-day VWAP)

1x1 process (mitigated by 50-day go-shop) & investor participation underscores "prewiring" a merger with Kronos downstream
3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics

2 companies with...

✅Similar scale & HC (~$1.5bn & ~6K FTEs)

✅Same ownership (PE consortium)

✅Cross-sell (i.e. PeopleDoc)

❓Overlap (i.e. UltiTime vs Dimensions)

❓Different back-end

❓Operating models (i.e. Imp & CS)

How do you put it together?
3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics (cont'd)

✅ $22bn TEV "all-stock" private-to-private M&A

✅ Kronos CEO Aron Ain tapped to lead CombinedCo

✅ Joint HQ'd in Lowell, MA (Kronos) & Weston, FL (Ultimate)

✅ Combined cap structure & clean-up / refi at Kronos (via Ultimate 1L/2L facilities)
3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics (cont'd)

"Private-to-private" all-stock deals can be complicated (in🧵below) given "relative value conundrum"

But ownership & governance overlap (i.e. H&F's Lead Director at Kronos = Ultimate Chairman) simplified the dynamic

3⃣ H&F Combo Mechanics (cont'd)

As a general rule of thumb, fund limited partners will want to avoid any "self-dealing" on marks during these downstream portfolio mergers

Hiring advisors to assist with valuation views (i.e. GS and MS) mitigates imbalance in negotiations
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company

*Merger of Equals* transactions can sometimes leave a lot of ambiguity with respect to "identity"

Following a 6-month process of surveying employees & bringing in various consultants, the CombinedCo rebranded as *Ultimate Kronos Group* ("UKG")
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company (cont'd)

The revamped GTM strategy was focused on 3 product families - Pro (large MNCs), Dimensions (large & mid-size orgs) & Ready (smaller orgs)

Operating model inclusive of free live training & dedicated imp. & continuous client service RMs
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company (cont'd)

UKG weathered it's 1st major headwind as its Kronos Private Cloud fell victim to a ransomware attack in Dec of '21 leading to tumult from 2K+ customers who experienced major outages during what's typically most chaotic payroll period
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company (cont'd)

Going forward, a key *equity story* point will be the progress of the product unification & simplification for enterprise & SMB

Kronos Private Cloud & on-premise UKG Workforce Central will be retired by Q4 '25 & Q1 '27, respectively
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company (cont'd)

UKG is aligning to many emerging feature sets that are viewed by many to be "table-stakes" for a buyer - e.g. earned wage access / on-demand pay

Key point: UKG Wallet (by Payactiv) is effectively a response to $CDAY's Dayforce Wallet
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company (cont'd)

Given legacy HR systems lack ability to support end-to-end workflows or processes, there has been an arms race to deliver *modern architecture* (esp. *low-code*)

Key point: FleX is effectively a response to $CDAY's Integration Studio
4⃣ UKG: The Combined Company (cont'd)

There are 2 main M&A philosophies, emblematic of Ultimate & Kronos, respectively

*Emerging tuck-ins* like GPTW & Quorbit to augment modern experience

*Installed base M&A* like Ascentis (w/ NOVAtime) to migrate to UKG's new offerings
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like

Chris Todd has stated a goal of ~$5bn revenue & ~$1.5bn "cash operating earnings" (call it Adj. EBITDA) by FY25

If equity market conditions are OK (w/ initiatives far along), IMO this is an "IPO-able" business in 2H '24 (off '25 numbers)
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like (cont'd)

Investors will look at "all-in-one" SaaS HCM peers (e.g. $PAYC, $PCTY, $PYCR) & sponsor-IPOs (e.g. $CWAN, $INST, $PSWC etc) but $CDAY will be THE primary comp

Leverage & M&A story could be limiting factors to "premium" valuation
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like (cont'd)

Figuring out what a UKG IPO could look like is really a matter of "what you can believe"

If by 2H '24 there is good visibility to hitting those FY25 targets, we can *work backwards* to come up with an *illustrative* structure
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like (cont'd)

Now we don't know what the cap structure (i.e. debt and cash on BS) will look like at the time of the IPO (i.e. 2H '24)

But let's just say the *goal* is to be at pro forma ~4.0x net leverage when *fully-distributed* to trade OK
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like (cont'd)

Today, $CDAY trades at ~8.0x fwd. rev. & I think you can make a good argument UKG trades at a discount to $CDAY based on:

❓Lower (overall & sub rev.) growth %

❓Less robust public market "report card"

❓Complex *platform* story
5⃣ What a Public UKG cloud look like (cont'd)

~6x FY25 rev implies $30bn TEV & $25bn Mkt Cap *@ trading* (say 4.0x PF net lev. on $1.25bn LTM EBITDA)

Hard to model pre-IPO cash/debt @ 2H'24 given all the recaps but *I think* a $3-4bn IPO *should* cover de-levering w/ secondary
6⃣ Summary takeaways - Key Question

Could this kind of M&A-led transformation have been done in the public markets (i.e. $ULTI M&A-ing Kronos)?

My thought is yes possible but would have been VERY difficult for a variety of reasons (notably how to *manage the Street*)
6⃣ Summary takeaways - Things to Watch

Both $CDAY & UKG have taken major steps in the past years to outgrow their *fulcrums* (i.e. Payroll for $CDAY and Time / Workforce Management for UKG)

The race for $WDAY and $SAP renewal base & emerging suites will be interesting for sure
Link to first tweet below in🧵

Follow me @GlogauGordon for thoughts on M&A, SaaS and other public & private markets topics

Like, retweet, share, spread the word🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gordon Glogau

Gordon Glogau Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GlogauGordon

Jan 22
Rumblings on "Private-to-Private" M&A deals

From an M&A practitioner perspective, I can't help but to think there will be a newfound appreciation for the level of complexity involved in consummating these specific types of transactions in today's environment

Let me explain...🧵
Talks of a wave of "VC-backed consolidation" over the next 12-18 months have been pervasive in various Valley circles recently, and manifesting in the form of:

🤝 Buyers using '21 valuations opportunistically as "M&A currency"

🤝 "Roll-ups of last resort" for subscale players
There have been a number of "private-to-private" all-stock (or majority stock) combinations that have been consummated before

Two "success stories" that come to mind are 1) Seamless + Grubhub and 2) Elance + oDesk (now $UPWK)

But these deals have enormous underlying complexity
Read 18 tweets
Jan 19
The term "hostile takeover" begets images of "raiders" dawning two-toned collared shirt & suspender combos, screaming into phones in a cigar-smoke-clouded mahogany rooms filled with dot matrix printer tear-sheets...

But, $EMR showed that companies too can also "go hostile"🧵
So yesterday, $EMR announced *a proposal* to acquire $NATI for $53.00 a share (~$7.6bn and 32% premium to last close)

$NATI is a $1.7bn electronic T&M business with 70% GMS, 35K customers across diverse end markets

Deal would advance $EMR's global automation focus & strategy
Why go "hostile"?

Well, in short, if as a buyer you're getting stonewalled by management & their Board, you can put the target "in play" by going directly to shareholders

$EMR made many attempts to engage with $NATI in private dating to 5/22 with no constructive engagement
Read 10 tweets
Jan 17
M&A is capital allocation tool to help reimagine the strategic priorities in a company's portfolio

But what happens when the pieces of the portfolio "no longer fit"?

"Separation" transactions are complicated & often misunderstood by investors

Here's some good stuff to know🧵
WHY do companies "break-up"?

Some reasons:

☑️Enhance operational focus

☑️Accommodate differing capital needs

☑️Create distinct "identities" for investors

☑️"Align" equity comp & currency for M&A

☑️Mitigate anti-trust concerns

☑️Quell activist pressure to "unlock value"
HOW do companies "break-up"?

Some pervasive mechanisms that companies have used to "unbundle the conglomerate discount" include the following:

1⃣ Divestitures

2⃣ Spin-Offs

3⃣ Split-Offs

4⃣ Carve-Out IPO

5⃣ Spin-Mergers

(NOTE: this isn't exhaustive; see WLRK for reference) Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 13
M&A always gets buzz in the public markets

But, many investors don't understand what a deal means for them as a shareholder

Also, most can't be bothered reading thousands of pages of underlying documentation (or just get it very wrong)

Here are the SEC filings to dig into🧵
⏳At Announcement ("T+0")

8-K & 425
✅Press Release
✅Investor Presentation
✅Transaction Docs

Takeaways:
🤔Focus on "how it works" (rationale + mechanics)
🤔Ask yourself: "what do I get or give here?"

Example: how the $10bn $ADBE stock part of Figma deal *technically* works ImageImageImage
Takeaway #2: "Read Between the Lines"
🤔Stop and ask "why did they do this?"
🤔Stop and ask "where's the risk?"

Examples (all co-dependent variables)
1⃣Deal Closing (i.e. why close on X date)
2⃣Termination (i.e. who's at risk of not closing)
3⃣Others (i.e. "go shop" in PE deals) ImageImageImage
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(