Thread by @TrialByTruth

Minimising aggressive treatment of staff is one way to go to limit those willing to enter politics. I suspect no-one in politics is now there under the impression it is a place of gentle give and take debate and soft deadlines

Respect and integrity should be a bare minimum, if push back is on staff who challenge the way other staff are treated, or this government riding roughshod over democratic checks and balances, might discrediting them be a useful way to go here?

Never met a bully who won't defend their actions as more like hearty banter and the rough and tumble of night stress working

Let's have a totally transparent review of the allegations and maybe even legal opinion on it. Before those protections in the ECHR and HRA are weakened

Gosh, could that in some way be relevant here to Raab I wonder?

*high stress

A clutch of legal professionals on Raab's missions to curb our human rights, past and present

https://twitter.com/SirJJKC/status/1602576419074228224?s=20

MPs not able to vote with their conscience. Civil servants who are sacked while trying to avert a crash. Critics having the media briefed to discredit them. Both the opposition and their own MPs. Does public interest get any kind of look in these days?

https://twitter.com/TrialByTruth/status/1564903398729728000?s=20

ICYI something on these dynamics buymeacoffee.com/TrialByTruth/b…

Raab starved the legal system, equivocated about Pincher (see below) tried to dig out personal details of striking barristers, put the #BillOfRights bill out there after avoiding adequate scrutiny

Might this not be a staff problem?

https://twitter.com/TrialByTruth/status/1544373403439824904?s=20

Is he an exception proving a rule?

https://twitter.com/TrialByTruth/status/1591416050939207681?s=20

But the MP cohort it is easiest to retain if aggressive management is normalised seems promising

https://twitter.com/TrialByTruth/status/1484144058813583362?s=20