" The translocation of the SARS-CoV-2βS mRNA appeared to be assisted by the S protein, which contains an NLS motif that is unique among human pathogenic beta-coronaviruses."
" To avoid image artifacts, we imaged multiple independent slides of SARS-CoV-2-infected airway ...
... epithelium (from three independent donors) using at least two different high-end confocal microscopes. Additionally, we used at least two different image processing strategies to determine nuclear localization. "
"Importantly, we were able to determine S mRNA nuclear translocation not only inside the nucleus but also on the nuclear surface."
"Interestingly, less than 10% of S mRNA was detected at the nuclear surface, which could explain the transitionary stage of S mRNA before it enters the nucleus or the novel transnuclear-membrane translocation of S mRNA, which was examined and described later."
" In approximately 1% of instances, S mRNA successfully translocated into the nucleus. The nuclear translocation of S mRNA is highly unusual because there have been few previous reports of S mRNA nuclear translocation and no information on the mechanism of nuclear translocation."
"However, we found that the IS4 βNSPRβ created a pat7 NLS βPRRARSVβ in the S protein, which was unique to SARS-CoV-2. Whether this noncanonical furin cleavage destroys the function of the NLS motif is important to determine, as the proposed noncanonical ...
... furin cleavage site is constitutively within the NLS motif (described later)."
π€ So while other betacoronaviruses have NLSs, SC2 is the only one with it in the S-protein? That's part of the mRNA sequence in the vaccines?π€
"Among coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2βS protein is the first type-1 transmembrane glycoprotein that translocates into the nucleus."
"First, we investigated whether the proposed polybasic site βRRARβ could itself be an NLS motif."
"... but was part of the P7 βPRRARSVβ NLS. Thus, the inserted sequence creates the NLS in the S protein of SC2 and may make SARS-CoV-2 unique among human pathogenic coronaviruses."
"When SARS-CoV-2βN protein has already been shown to bind to RNA (Schmidt et al., 2021), we still do not know how exactly S protein binds to S mRNA for nuclear translocation. "
"We only know is S mRNA nuclear translocation is more likely mediated by the S protein because S mRNA nuclear translocation was always associated with the S protein."
"In conclusion, the SARS-CoV-2βS protein has a functional pat7 NLS βPRRARSV,β that results in one out of four S proteins translocating into the nucleus in infected cells. S Protein appears to shuttle S mRNA (possibly the genome) into the nucleus of the infected cells."
The real question is ... If this was true, do you think they knew that before using the entire sequence in the vaccines? π€
I guess this is the cue for the mRNA β‘οΈ cDNA thread/papers that show that indeed it reverse transcribes. @dr_SDRK
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
But this is part of a much larger backdrop of information when you start looking at data that spans 2020-2022... Because something changed in 2021 that impacted a large proportion of the population (especially in the Western World).
@super_spreaders A few things that might help clarify things to your viewers. (In simplified/layman terms.)
1) Your DNA contains the code for you. Including all the protein you can make.
@super_spreaders 2) When your cell wants to produce (synthesize) protein, it first makes a copy of your DNA, but as mRNA (transcription). 3) This happens inside the nucleus of your cell. The mRNA then leaves the nucleus of the cell (into the cytoplasm); but stays in the cell.
@super_spreaders 4) The mRNA gets taken up by ribosomes (some cellular machinery) for protein synthesis (to make proteins) in the rough ER (organelle/region of the cell).
Twitter auto/easy conversation archiver ideas (not a thread unroller -- I want to archive the convo since people are still getting banned left, right and center):
[1] Could be higher level than most. Even with a HS biology (to the level where they cover cell biology and human anatomy), if this knowledge is a decade old (or even 5 years) and they're not in a science field that recalls any of that knowledge, I have serious doubts ...
/2
[1] they'd even know it's a cell diagram at a glance (and a eukaryotic cell at that).
It's probably fine to name things (e.g. lipidnanoparticle - LNP).
It's complex enough that you may want to consider a series of diagrams with different texts and things pointed out and ...
/3
A longitudinal cohort study from Scandinavian countries starting 2020-12-27.
"Among 23β―122β―522 Nordic residents (81% vaccinated by study end; 50.2% female), 1077 incident myocarditis events and 1149 incident pericarditis events were identified. Within the 28-day ..."
/2
"... period, for males and females 12 years or older combined who received a homologous schedule, the second dose was associated with higher risk of myocarditis, with adjusted IRRs of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.43-2.14) for BNT162b2 and 6.57 (95% CI, 4.64-9.28) for mRNA-1273."
/3