1/ Available footage from the recently held joint Russia-Belarus "tactical flight exercise" suggests that it did not extensively incorporate lessons from Ukraine. That said, the exercise did include several noteworthy elements in this regard. (A short 🧵with a few examples 👇).
2/ The Belarusian side trained to conduct combat search & rescue (CSAR). Retrieval of "downed" airmen was performed by Mi-8MTV-5-1s supported by Mi-24s. A 🇧🇾 military official described it as "quite a difficult element " with "conditions approximating those of actual combat."
3/ Meanwhile, The Belarusian Chief of the General Staff, Viktor Gulevich, emphasized that being able to rescue downed airmen is vital because "the preparation of any pilot is very expensive in a financial sense."
Gulevich's remark & the CSAR scenario is noteworthy because...
4/ many Russian aircrews (including experienced crews) have been downed over Ukraine. Hence, CSAR has been an important element of Russian air operations in the war. Notably, Russian attack helicopters will typically have a CSAR-tasked Mi-8 attached to them (as seen here).
5/ Another notable aspect of the exercise is the participation of a Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) A-50U airborne warning & control (AEW&C) aircraft.
The two stills below allows us to identify the participating A-50U as Bort "43" Red (RF-50608).
6/ Commander of the Belarusian Air & Air Defense Forces, Andrey Lukyanovich, emphasized that the A-50U "allowed us to significantly expand radar coverage practically across the entire depth of Belarusian territory, specifically at low- and very low-altitudes."
7/Lukyanovich's remark is noteworthy given that, In Ukraine, the Russian military continues to face low-altitude targets. Indeed, Ukrainian fixed- & rotary-wing aircraft often operate at low- & very-low levels to enhance their survivability (as seen here).
8/ Also noteworthy is the employment of the A-50U in support of suppression/destruction of enemy air defenses (SEAD/DEAD) missions during the exercise, though few details are provided.
9/ In this regard, the VKS' relatively small fleet of A-50(U)s has seen extensive use in the war against Ukraine, supporting, among other things, defensive and offensive counterair (including SEAD/DEAD) tasks/sorties conducted by Russian multirole and strike fighters.
10/As a final example, the exercises saw the participation of MiG-31K/I strike aircraft, which, together with the 9-S-7760 aero-ballistic missile, make up the Kinzhal weapon system. Kinzhal was used "for work against detected ground targets" (presumably, simulated launches only).
11/ Kinzhal is a relatively recent addition to the VKS' arsenal. It has seen limited use in the war against Ukraine, with some Kinzhal strikes likely having been conducted from Belarusian airspace.
12/12 Reportedly, Kinzhal was used to strike, inter alia, underground command posts, and munitions storage sites. Presumably, the exercise rehearsed attacks against similar "detected ground targets." No details are provided on what assets were used to detect & locate targets.
Update 1/2
In a new VoenTV segment, the commander of Belarus' 116th ShAB stated that aircrews practiced low-level loft delivery techniques.
In Ukraine, low-level loft delivery techniques are widely employed by Russian ground attack aircraft & helicopters to enhance survivability.
Update 2/2
Interestingly, however, none of the footage released from the exercise shows aircraft and/or helicopters conducting loft attacks with rockets and/or bombs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A short post on the "Dva Majora" (Two Majors) Telegram channel regarding the S-70 shoot down incident claims the following:
"This was the first combat evaluation. At the end of testing, control over the vehicle was indeed lost."
(Image unreleated to incident)
2/ "The S-70 left the zone of combat duty and was shot down by our accompanying fighter so as to eliminate the risks of the prototype combat vehicle diverting to the enemy."
3/ "During the combat evaluation, previously unidentified vulnerabilities in the drone control system were identified. After they are resolved, testing - including combat use - will resume."
1/ The Jan. 2024 edition of Military Thought features an article entitled "Peculiarities of Air Tactics in Modern Combat Operations & Ways of their Improvement." It includes a section listing some of the "unfavorable factors reducing the effectiveness of VVS aviation operations."
2/ While the section offers nothing new to those who follow the Russian Air Force (VVS) and the war in Ukraine, it is nevertheless notable because one of the authors is VVS commander Col. Gen. Sergey Dronov.
Factors identified by Dronov and his co-authors (two colonels) include:
3/ " - Large-scale military assistance from NATO and EU countries [in the form of] armament, munitions, high-precision weapons, UAVs, air defense assets, etc.
- Actions of Ukrainian Armed Forces (VSU) air defense systems of Russian [i.e. Soviet] and foreign origin."
1/ The VKS and PLAAF held another joint patrol with Tu-95MS strategic missile carriers and H-6K bombers. The Russian MoD reports that the joint patrol was conducted over the East China Sea, Sea of Japan and Pacific Ocean, lasting approximately 8 hours.
2/ Per the MoD, the aircraft were escorted by Su-35S, Su-30SM & J-11B fighters. Latter two types are not shown; however, the video briefly shows a Su-35S ("21" Blue), MiG-31BSM ("94" Blue) & Su-30M2 ("41" Blue). All 3 are assigned to the 22nd IAP based in Tsentralnaya Uglovaya.
3/ The video shows that the joint exercise also involved an A-50U AEW&C aircraft (Bort "37" Red / RF-93966).
1/ Since someone asked why Su-34s are typically shown carrying just 1 ARM each:
Su-34 SEAD patrols are largely meant to deter Ukrainian SAM operators from emitting. They are conducted in a risk-averse manner; the Su-34s appear to operate well inside Russian-controlled airspace...
2/ and rarely (if at all) enter the engagement zones of Ukrainian SAM systems inorder to attempt to entice their operators into activating their radars so as to then attack them with ARMs. Hence, Su-34s seemingly oftentimes do not launch ARMs on such patrols, especially given...
3/ that the rules of engagement apparently typically require them to first report a detected emitter to a command post and then wait for authorization to launch an ARM against it. This is done to reduce the likelihood of fatricide, but also increases the chances that...
1/ "A US-made Patriot air defense system was likely damaged, but not destroyed, as the result of a Russian missile barrage in and around Kyiv early Tuesday morning local time, a US official tells CNN." cnn.com/2023/05/16/pol…
2/2 "The US is still assessing to what degree the system was damaged, the official said. That will determine whether the system needs to be pulled back entirely or simply repaired on the spot by Ukrainians forces."
1/ Anonymous sources cited by Izvestia assert that Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missiles are being launched by Ukrainian Su-24Ms, which operate "under the cover of MiG-29 & Su-27 fighters [equipped] with HARM anti-radiation missiles." iz.ru/1513291/izvest…
2/ According to the sources, "[to ensure the safety of their aviation, the Ukrainian command is [also] actively using false targets in the form of UAVs" (presumably, they mean Miniature Air-Launched Decoys (MALDs), though other UAVs may be employed for this purpose as well).
3/3 Lastly, Izvestia's sources alledge that "[t]he VKS shot down several Ukrainian aircraft and one Storm Shadow in recent days." Of course, zero evidence is provided to support these kill claims.