Fun facts on the UK tax code, the longest in the world.
Its complexity is yet anther way in which tax is holding Britain back. A thread:
The UK tax code is over 21,000 pages long and contains over 10 million words.
That's about 12 times the length of the Complete Works of Shakespeare and 12.5 times the number of words in the Bible (800,000 words).
It's 8 times longer than Marcel Proust’s ‘À La Recherche Du Temps Perdu’ which at 1.26 million words has the Guinness World Record for the longest novel ever written.
Proust's novel is a better read.
By contrast the Hong Kong tax code, reckoned to be one of the world's most effective, is a mere 300 pages long.
Of course Hong Kong is now significantly richer than Britain and has better public services.
It is possible to reduce the length of our tax code, but that would require leadership. Chancellor Nigel Lawson scrapped one tax every budget and reduced the number of income tax bands to two.
Since then politicians have blabbed on about simplifying but done the exact opposite
Labour's Gordon Brown trebled the length of the tax code. His successor, George Osborne, called the tax code "one of the most complex and opaque” on earth, and said he would simplify it radically.
In practice the tax code doubled again under his tenure as Chancellor.
Osborne set up a new quango, the Office for Tax Simplification, which failed to simplify taxes but did cost taxpayers over £1m per year.
It even once proposed increasing CGT. Thankfully it was abolished by @KwasiKwarteng
Our current government of course continues to increase the complexity of the code. We have had the new digital services tax and of course the 'making tax digital' requirements.
Better described as 'making tax more tiresome' these introduce horrendous new levels of complexity.
The code's complexity has many negative consequence, not only on investment as well as compliance costs, but also for all those who are hounded by HMRC for misinterpreting the code.
The only meaningful way to simplify the tax code is to scrap whole taxes.
That needs courage and leadership, sadly in short supply across all parties.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Britain has a tax system where the top 100 super-taxpayers contribute almost as much as the North Sea oil industry; where the top 0.1% pay more income tax than the entire bottom 50%," notes @FraserNelson as he shreds Labour's class warfare smokescreen on tax. 1/5
"Even in her best-case scenario, rich-squeezing barely affects the public finances. [By her own estimates] her moves on inheritance tax, schools & non-doms together increase the tax haul by just below 0.5%. The real money is raised by stealth tax: freezing everyone’s tax-free allowance & catching more workers in higher tax brackets. And, of course, the big one: raising employers’ national insurance (NI), a tax paid indirectly by workers (through lower pay) and consumers (through inflation, now highest in the G7)."
"Raising employers’ NI was expected to lose 50,000 jobs over five years — it has in fact cost 125,000 jobs so far, with more to come. And that’s before the coming Employment Rights Bill."
But who has been getting the new payrolled jobs, asks Fraser?
Keir Starner has appointed a Housing Minister who hates private housing.
Miatta Fahnbulleh, former CEO of the far left New Economics Foundation (NEF), wants to tax & regulate private housing to death and build state housing instead.
1/11
Miatta & the NEF are fixated on forcing the transfer of private rented homes to the public sector. "Policy should be geared towards upgrading existing private rented homes to ensure they are energy efficient, & acquiring & repurposing them as homes for social rent," they write.
"Social housing held and controlled by the public sector is best placed to meet social policy needs," they say.
They are not keen on the private sector building more houses, sniffily noting that "meeting the housebuilding targets would make it impossible for the UK to achieve its commitment to its carbon reduction goals by 2050."
Miatta herself campaigned against a private housing development in Peckham, saying "I support building homes on the Aylesham site — but they must include the right amount of social and affordable housing.”
Of course housing developments aren't viable on those terms.
Keir Starmer has appointed a high tax fanatic, Minouche Shafik, as his personal economic adviser.
Shafik is a collectivist academic who believes that “the idea that you are successful because you are smart & hardworking is pernicious & wrong."
She is a menace. 1/6
She wants to grab people's pension pots, saying "those with comfortable pension pots must be expected to pay more towards the common good.”
She also proposed “the imposition of property taxes which would direct a flow of capital from those in high value properties to those unable to get on the property ladder, through a capital endowment scheme.”
She co-chaired Torsten Bell's ‘Economy 2030 Inquiry’ which proposed a vast number of tax hikes, including the following:
Cut the VAT registration threshold to £50,000 then £30,000.
Create Road Duty for EVs.
End free carbon permits & introduce carbon border adjustment.
Encourage local congestion charges.
Charge Capital Gains Tax on death and when moving out of UK.
Scrap non-dom status.
Hike national insurance for higher self-employed incomes by 300% to 8%.
Hike basic rate of Dividend tax from 8.75% to 20%.
Introduce NI for rental income.
Extend employer NI to employer pension contributions.
Cut the £270,000 cap on tax-free pensions to £40,000.
Make everyone pay inheritance tax by scrapping the nil-rate band.
Hike vehicle excise duty for heavier cars.
Introduce pay-per-mile road duty for electric vehicles.
Scrap business and agricultural property reliefs.
Raise CGT on shares to 37% and real estate to 53%.
A branch manager of a lettings business was awarded a £25,000 bonus, but was horrified to learn that he would be left with less than nothing after tax. As a result of his £25,000 bonus, £25,533 would be taken by the tax man.
1/4
Over £100k the tax rate on his £25,000 bonus was 60% i.e. £15,000. "On top of this, he pays 2% NI plus another 9% is deducted to pay for this student loan which is really a graduate tax. This means an effective tax rate of 71% i.e. £17,750." writes Adam Walker
"As if this isn’t bad enough he has a 2-year-old daughter. Because he earned too much, he had already lost his right to claim child benefit which is worth £1,354p.a. However, his bonus £25,000 bonus means that he also no longer qualifies for 30 hours per week of free childcare which is worth a further £7,783p.a.. "
"When you add all this together, the impact of his £25,000 bonus is that the poor chap will be £533 worse off. He was so disgusted by this that he asked his employer to pay the whole of his bonus into his pension. This avoided the tax but it didn’t make him feel any less resentful."
"At the age of 28, he was looking forward to spending his hard-earned bonus on something nice not locking it up in a pension that he cannot spend for another 30 or 40 years.
As a consequence, their star manager who they so desperately wanted to keep decided to leave & take a job in Dubai."
"As we talk about the tax-raising budget to come we should not think of it as inevitable. It would be a gross breach of promise. It was what Labour were elected not to do, what they told us all that they would not do," says Danny Finkelstein in @thetimes
It's a key point
1/4
"Labour ran for office saying repeatedly that their plans were “about prosperity, not higher taxes”. At its manifesto launch Angela Rayner announced that “we can’t tax our way to growth.” To which Rachel Reeves added that “we don’t have a tax-and-spend manifesto. We have a growth plan.”
“There is nothing in our plans that requires any further increases in taxes, I have confidence in that. Voters can have confidence,” Rachel told Sky News.
"All of our plans are fully funded and fully costed and none of them require tax rises over and above the ones that we’ve already announced,” said Keir