Cut My Tax Profile picture
Feb 3 10 tweets 4 min read
Fun facts on the UK tax code, the longest in the world.

Its complexity is yet anther way in which tax is holding Britain back. A thread:
The UK tax code is over 21,000 pages long and contains over 10 million words.

That's about 12 times the length of the Complete Works of Shakespeare and 12.5 times the number of words in the Bible (800,000 words).
It's 8 times longer than Marcel Proust’s ‘À La Recherche Du Temps Perdu’ which at 1.26 million words has the Guinness World Record for the longest novel ever written.

Proust's novel is a better read.
By contrast the Hong Kong tax code, reckoned to be one of the world's most effective, is a mere 300 pages long.

Of course Hong Kong is now significantly richer than Britain and has better public services.
It is possible to reduce the length of our tax code, but that would require leadership. Chancellor Nigel Lawson scrapped one tax every budget and reduced the number of income tax bands to two.

Since then politicians have blabbed on about simplifying but done the exact opposite
Labour's Gordon Brown trebled the length of the tax code. His successor, George Osborne, called the tax code "one of the most complex and opaque” on earth, and said he would simplify it radically.

In practice the tax code doubled again under his tenure as Chancellor.
Osborne set up a new quango, the Office for Tax Simplification, which failed to simplify taxes but did cost taxpayers over £1m per year.

It even once proposed increasing CGT. Thankfully it was abolished by @KwasiKwarteng
Our current government of course continues to increase the complexity of the code. We have had the new digital services tax and of course the 'making tax digital' requirements.

Better described as 'making tax more tiresome' these introduce horrendous new levels of complexity.
The code's complexity has many negative consequence, not only on investment as well as compliance costs, but also for all those who are hounded by HMRC for misinterpreting the code.
The only meaningful way to simplify the tax code is to scrap whole taxes.

That needs courage and leadership, sadly in short supply across all parties.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cut My Tax

Cut My Tax Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CutMyTaxUK

Feb 2
Corporate tax should be zero, points out Stuart Kirk in an excellent article in the FT

Scrapping corporation tax would remove myriad distortions and inefficiencies 1/6 Image
"Companies are generally seen as fair game when it comes to taxes. It looks much better on television to target the global headquarters of a faceless mega-firm than a hard-up family with bills to pay. And therein lies the problem," says @stuartkirk__.....2/6 Image
"What politicians around the world fail to understand is that companies do not exist as such — they are nothing but a series of trade-offs between four groups of humans: staff, customers, suppliers and investors. Companies do not generate tax. Only people can do that". 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jan 23
A shocking new study of official UK Gov data from @Civitas_UK has revealed that a record 54.2% of individuals now live in households which receive more in benefits than they pay in direct and indirect taxes. A thread: Image
Moreover 83% of all Income Tax is paid by just 40% of British adults

And more than half – 53% – is paid by the top 10% of earners, three times as much income tax as the bottom 60% – despite this group being six times larger. Image
The top 20% of individuals pay two thirds – 66% – of all Income Tax, handing over, on average, £35,000 more in taxes than they receive in public spending or universal benefits (like a bus pass they probably don't use).
Read 6 tweets
Jan 23
Another leading British businessman has lambasted the Government's tax polices.

Sir Rocco Forte says "the Government is paralysing the economy with taxes."
"Individuals who are relatively low earners are being subjected to draconian levels of taxation. No one on £50k can be considered rich – indeed many families on this level of income are still in receipt of benefits – but that is the point at which the 40% tax rate kicks in."
"Incentives to work are constantly being eroded. Big earners are being driven overseas and big spenders are being discouraged from coming here in the first place," Sir Rocco laments.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
A thread on the Hat Tax.

The hat tax was introduced by PM Pitt the Younger’s government in 1784 as a means of raising extra revenue. The theory was that rich people had more hats. Image
The tax had two components:
1. a licence that hat retailers were forced to buy, accompanied by a compulsory sign “Dealer in Hats by Retail.” The licence cost £2 in London and 5 shillings elsewhere.
2. a requirement for each hat to have a revenue stamp pasted inside on its lining. Image
The cost of the revenue stamp depended on that of the hat. The more expensive the hat = the higher the tax.

A hat costing four shillings attracted a duty of threepence, all the way up to a tax of two shillings for hats over twelve shillings.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 17, 2022
If you are successful in Scotland 54% of your income will be confiscated if you start to earn over £43,663.

A thread on how the SNP Government’s tax increases will undermine the Scottish Government’s revenue base. 1/9
Employees living in Scotland earning between £43,663 and £50,270 will now pay 22% more than their counterparts elsewhere in the UK, - a 54% tax rate - as the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland has highlighted. 2/9
Only 362,000 Scots pay the higher rate of tax, but together with the 15,000 who pay the top rate, they account for 60% of tax receipts. It doesn’t seem too smart for the SNP to persecute them if it wants to preserve Scotland’s tax base. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Dec 15, 2022
Why should taxpayers be forced to fund the anti-taxpayer, public sector lobby misnamed the Institute for Fiscal Studies? - A thread

Today it called for another tax rise: Image
The IFS argues for increased taxes to fund the public sector. That's no surprise as it's to all intents and purposes part of the public sector. In 2020, the last year for which this "transparent" body published accounts, 64% of its budget was paid for by the UK government. Image
Another 10% of its budget comes from international public sector bodies heavily financed by the British Government and much of the rest from leftist charities such as the Joseph Rowntree and Rockwool Foundations.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(