A bore evacuator creates a pressure differential in order for the toxic fumes created by firing a shell to leave through the barrel.
No crew member wants a puff of toxic gas when the breech opens!
It is thin and surrounds a part of the barrel that has holes in it.
The bore evacuator can be seen at work when a tank fires a shell. The toxic gas (a white plume of smoke) can be seen leaving the barrel AFTER the shell has already been fired.
Every modern tank has one. It usually appears as a "bump" in the barrel, a portion of bigger diameter.
An M1A2 Abrams, with and without its bore evacuator:
Original video:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵The presence of Relikt ERA on the latest T-72B3M could point towards decreasing russian tank stocks.
Here's why 👇
1/5 #UkraineRussiaWar #Ukraine️ #Tanks
The Kontakt-5 module usually seen on the T-72B3M is welded to the hull. It would be costly and time consuming to remove it.
This means that if a tank which already has Kontakt-5 gets upgraded to T-72B3M, it would most likely retain the old ERA, as we've seen up until now.
2/5
This means it's possible that all T-72B3M tanks ever produced used hulls of T-72s that already had Kontakt-5 installed.
The earliest contracts never mention K-5, as it was likely assumed to already be installed. Plus, assembly line photos show hulls with K-5 pre-installed.
🧵The T-90M is known for being arguably the most protected tank of all the in-service russian MBTs but the turret side protection leaves a lot to be desired...
#Ukraine #UkraineRussiaWar #UkraineWar
The turret side is protected by two segments of Relikt ERA (Explosives sandwiched between 2x flyer plates). One of them is angled, while the upper one is not. This leaves a large gap in the side protection, as the non-angled ERA will perform much worse.
Russian forces had to learn the hard way, as issues with this area of the tank have appeared over the course of the war, with some tanks being penetrated in the side of the turret.
During the year 2000, the development of the TOS-1A was taking place. Realising that the T-80U tank was not going to be produced anymore, Omsktransmash made a last ditch effort to remain relevant and used the chassis with the new TOS-1A turret module.
The usage of the T-80U chassis significantly improved the mobility of the system, however there were several issues. The suspension was less reliable than on the T-72 platform and the gas turbine's air intake sucked in propellant fumes and dirt after firing a salvo of rockets.
🧵 VACUUM - The tangled history of Russia's high-power armour piercing shell.
Disclaimer: The information in this thread has not been adequately verified to be true due to a lack of quality data on the topic at hand!
For the purposes of this thread, I will assume that Vacuum is a real project and will present its alleged history as I have understood it.
In the early 1990s, Yekaterinburg Plant No.9 received a request to create two new cannons of different calibers, but using a similar technology and design. The resulting cannons were the 125mm 2A82 cannon and the 152mm 2A83 cannon respectively.