Can anyone explain how all-cause mortality in the UK in April 2020 spiked at exactly the same time in every region when travel routes into the UK are overwhelmingly via the South East?
Travel is undertaken by only a fraction of the population at any one time, so the idea that "COVID" could be spread by travel as explanation of this sporadic pattern of worldwide spread seems unlikely.
It should spread locally - predominantly.
Yet there was basically no increase in all-cause mortality outside of Wuhan in mainland China for 2 years.
Which means that the only logical explanation is that the MERS outbreaks - which were "not natural" - were the model for the transmitting "COVID" to the world in such an unnatural manner. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32288979/
The remaining question should be: how could this be obtained with a coronavirus, which can't survive in the water supply or the food supply or in UV light? healthline.com/health/does-uv…
One answer is an infectious clone or vector. Just like the Astrazeneca "vaccine" - you can put a virus into another organism and the other organism can express the virus
The supervising author is Pei-Yong Shi of the UTMB who is (1) affiliated to the PLA-CCP (2) the head of the lab that produced the "neutralising antibody" studies for the Pfizer "vaccine".
No, I'm not kidding.
Here are Pei-Yong Shi's academic networks.
Pfizer.
Novartis.
Gilead.
Chinese Academy of Sciences (PLA-CCP)
The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.
"No name" virus.
Really?
The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.
In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.
But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.
Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25):