Tate's continued imprisonment is called preventative detention. He is being held on grounds that, if he were released, he would likely commit crimes e.g. intimidate or harm women.
This means you can imprison ppl for crimes they have NOT committed.
It's like "pre-crime."
Liberal states have always used preventative detention to persecute political dissidents, particularly against people of color and Muslims in colonial contexts.
This was also the justification for detaining Muslims in Gitmo. The US gov admitted that they could not charge...
...the Muslim inmates for any crimes, but they were still justified in detaining these Muslims because, if they were released, they could *potentially* commit crimes. Why? Bc religious Muslims are usually violent and inclined to terrorism. That was their bigoted argument.
In order to maintain power, the US and other liberal states use preventative detention and other means to suspend due process and nullify the supposed human rights they claim to uphold.
Andrew Tate is simply the most recent high profile victim of this tactic.
Ironically, the social justice clowns who claim to fight colonialism and stand with Muslims and people of color are celebrating Tate's detention. This is because their understanding of liberal repression is simplistic and immature and also because they are colonialists at heart.
Vast majority of social justice and decolonial activists approve of the use of extreme repression/violence to destroy people, culture, & religions they believe are bigoted, misogynistic, or homophobic. They approve of the liberal state slaughtering those with differing beliefs.
This is why most woke liberals are happy Tate is detained in violation of all standards of due process and habeas corpus. Basic human rights don't apply for "misogynists" just like they didn't apply for Muslim "terrorists" at Gitmo.
How the US gov funds native informants to spread Islamic reform online.
Jay Hashmi is a troll who is often in my replies crying about how I'm "scared" to debate him. I get about a dozen debate challenges per day from no name losers like Jay, but...
...Jay is different because he was recently hired as a director at @mpac_national.
MPAC is a "Muslim" org with a long history working for the US gov to police, surveil, and entrap Muslims.
MPAC has worked closely with the FBI and DHS to implement CVE policies against Muslims.
What is CVE? It is the gov program developed post 9/11 used in numerous countries to target religious Muslims by characterizing them as "extremists" for things like growing a beard, being strict about not drinking, or believing that Islam is the only religion acceptable to God.
And don't say that this topic is not relevant to modernism. My book is highly concerned with the history of murtads like you working with liberal colonial regimes to surveil & brutally crack down on religious Muslims.
Your work with MPAC is a continuation of that bloody legacy.
Go ahead & have your boss @SalamAlmarayati ask his handlers at the Dept of Homeland Security if they will allow you to debate me at UCLA on this topic.
If you refuse, we will know the real reason: MPAC couldn't get permission from DHS bc they don't want you to blow your cover.
These three are at the forefront of pushing zionism onto Muslims on social media in the English language. They target distinct Muslim demographics (shia, salafi, desi). But their core message is the same:
1. Palestinians are primarily to blame for their own plight, not Israel.
2. Hamas is a terrorist org and Israel is justified in attacking Palestine in order to eliminate them.
3. Political Islam in general is extremism, terrorism, a deviation from true Islam.
4. Any Muslim that calls for Caliphate is a terror sympathizer.
5. Any Muslim who criticizes Saudi, UAE, Egypt govs for normalizing ties with Israel is an extremist.
6. Making ties with Israel is Islamically acceptable/required, and the Prophet ﷺ would have done the same.