It’s wild reading British news headlines from abroad. A govt not talking to crucial sectors on strike, people barely managing a cost of living crisis, Brexit costs unacknowledged, so too climate crisis, but govt wants to whip up fury about small boats & leave ECHR yet again.
These politically unstable years since the referendum have done a lot of damage - with Britain on one hand rightly damning violations of international law by states including Russia and China, but itself making wrecking ball threats which jeopardise & may weaken those same norms.
This “pick and mix” approach to law isn’t just reflected internationally, but also domestically. Tomorrow, as the Lords debate #REULBill, we have another example of a govt playing fast and loose with the frameworks and stability of law. It’s a dangerous game. With consequences.
Just re-posting a piece I wrote a few weeks ago on the #REULBill, in case it’s of assistance to anyone tomorrow.
For those who haven’t read this, a powerful read from a respected HL committee which states the #REUL Bill “runs directly counter to the principles of parliamentary democracy and represents a significant backward step.”
One last addition - this is a useful thread on that HL report I linked earlier. It will be extremely useful and I hope peers of all political stripes will read and consider it. #REULBill
And just like that, #GlobalBritain becomes the next Brexit catchphrase to bite the dust. This news that the UK formally is to downgrade its longstanding commitment to human rights for close diplomatic ties is a real blow. Soft power has always mattered. theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
Hoping for a strong and principled response from opposition parties on the govt’s reported foreign policy intention to drop the UK’s long-standing commitment to human rights for close diplomatic ties.
Pragmatism has always been a bedrock of foreign policy. But my own experience of British diplomacy around the world has been that the values, language & culture of human rights often have been played an important role, even if not always as central as human rights advocates wish.
#IndyRef2 UK Supreme Court ruling now with unanimous judgment: Court has decided it does have power to decide reference from Lord Advocate. Consistent with rule of law & public interest.
Supreme Court does not uphold SNP arguments on the right to self-determination under international law. Finds it cannot meet the threshold of a colonised people or an oppressed people, following Canadian SC judgment on Quebec.
Proposed Bill *does* relate to reserved matters
Scot Parliament does not have right to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence without agreement from Westminster.
The speedy congratulations posted out by world leaders overnight is really testament to quite how frightening a Bolsonoro victory would have been, and they are a rare joy and optimism to behold, even with the hard work ahead for Brazil. Parabens @LulaOficial!
Leading the way with genuine warmth and elegant optimism is, as ever, President Macron, reflecting that Lula’s win opens a new page of history in Brazil.
They are not EU laws but UK laws which we have because of our EU membership. The #REUL Bill will set fire to legal certainty & stability for individuals, business & growth. An arbitrary way to make law, allowing Ministers to replace or lose 2400+ laws, without Plmnt scrutiny.
All sorts of critical regulations are affected, including employment rights, environmental protections, food standards, consumer rights, animal protection etc.
Replacing decades of carefully crafted regulations which protect us requires careful consultation & scrutiny by Plmnt.
The Government's own REUL dashboard makes clear the scale of the task. DEFRA has 570 pieces of law alone.
Even if the sunset is delayed (as reportedly being considered), it doesn't diminish the resource required or the lack of democratic accountability. public.tableau.com/app/profile/go…
Hoping lawyers, civil society & MPs examine carefully the #RetainedEULawBill. It will hand sweeping power to the executive over critical areas of people’s lives like workers rights, environmental & consumer protections, with alarming implications for legal certainty & stability.
If it feels like Groundhog Day, that’s because it is. But this is not an argument about Brexit.
We have left the EU. That doesn’t enable a free pass for any govt of the day to deregulate in an arbitrary way.
The risks of unintended consequences, at the very least, are high.
This is a really excellent @commonslibrary background briefing which I would urge people to read carefully.
Warning: It’s hot towel over head territory. It is dry & helps to consider substantive examples in workers rights or environmental protections . commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief…