Another related and carefully stated reflection of the same from @MrMarkEThomas in a thread on the #REUL. If firms are deregulated clumsily while we erode human rights, firms do not self-police. See Shell, BP and more general billionaire uptick
@MrMarkEThomas The argument that those with power and wealth will default to an altruistic equilibrium for the country is utter nonsense. This should all be a stark example
Finally, if you struggle to credit me with the knowledge to be reliable on this. Martin Wolf is here with similar. @FT's top man on the prevailing economics prospectmagazine.co.uk/economics-and-…
I said I was done, but maybe note hecklers at Biden's state of the nation. It is the equivalent cohort cheering for destruction of our public services and our protective regulations and laws
The party were warned against misleading us and brewing up fights with more concocted and fictional enemies. Folk are not daft, we mostly see through it
It is not either greedy bullies, or deluded commies. Most of us sit squarely in the middle and really need a return to some humanity, sanity, honesty, accountability
The RAAC thing has completely broken my head. The timing has to be a decision, unless it was forced by a leak. This government that did everything not to shut schools doing this? What is going on? I suspect more will come out
Perhaps close enough to the election to guarantee the cost is a problem for the next administration. @bylinetimes reporting in June, to go with what you know about Gove cancelling the school building programme in 2010. It's a 'Why now?' not 'Why? question bylinetimes.com/2023/06/28/hun…
Why is our human rights act and ECHR inconvenient for government? Not just about people on small boats. What could a government do to you and your family if there is no backstop to appeal elsewhere and laws can be changed and passed with little consideration of human rights?
That is the frustration driving this move. The NHS data reuse and AI ambitions are central here, as are the plans for deregulation. If done carelessly and workers rights and consumer rights are run roughshod over, the equation is 'Will we get caught and can we be sanctioned?'
That is evidenced here from when an EU delegation came to review plans for Data Protection divergence with the Data Reform Bill (DPDI No.2 Bill as it is now)
Matt heaping on the easy to agree with nostalgia, with a nascent movement entirely dependent on social media and targeting people to foster grievance at some poorly defined blob of 'new elite' people
Free Speech Union, as the main partner organisation, is run by an Oxford graduate who has spent most of his life as contrarian loud hailer. All about the terrors of wokeness, diversity, and lack of race science in public policy. What exactly is fought for against and for here?
A nominally new sovereignty fight to congeal around for the election. Won't happen, for good reasons, but that simply adds grist to the mill for arguing 'EU' interference (it's Council of Europe, not part of the EU body we left)
If this government can pull off getting people to vote against their own Human Rights, then we would see rights in domestic law erode for all in the next parliament. What would weaker human rights do? Sure you can treat migrants how the heck you like, but same for everyone
Onwards and don't swerve to spare the proles? This is not exactly a quiet ambition. When Cameron had Beechcroft look into no fault firing, main flies in the ointment were equalities law, human rights act, EU worker protections, and ECHR appeal mechanisms. Not about your freedom
This is like letting NHS backlogs grow and staff leave so we hate that enough to tolerate NHS private rescue packages. These people are that utilitarian about lives. Suck it and see, fatally