#AGBT23 More details on the $ILMN Illumina Infinity reads technology from Alex Aravanis (post from LinkedIn).
Also first data shared on XLEAP-SBS chemistry for the NextSeq 1000/2000 instruments. Not sure why would anyone buy one of these instruments given the alternatives from @ElemBio and @CompleteGenomic 's G400.
First shipment on NovaSeq X: if Illumina can beat the competition at anything in the next few months, it'll be on manufacturing and deployment of the NovaSeq X.
A summary of announcements/highlights from #AGBT23 (in no particular order):
#AGBT23 cfDNA methylation profiling as a blood biomarker for Congestive Heart Failure. This is from the same team that gave you the @GrailBio Methylation Atlas, now applied to biomarker discovery. genomeweb.com/sequencing/agb…
#AGBT23 Miga on the comparison between PacBio Revio and Oxford @nanopore High Duplex / UltraLong reads. PacBio 21/46 T2T and ONT 24/46 (higher is better). Ultralong reads scaffolding for both (unconfirmed) would mean ONT lead is even bigger.
In #NextGenerationProteomics news, today we cover the basics of Proximity ligation assay (PLA) technology, also known as proximity barcoding assay technology, which is a method for detecting protein-protein interactions in cells or tissues.
The assay is based on the principle of ligating two probes (such as antibodies) that are in close proximity to each other, typically within a few nanometers. The ligation reaction produces a circular DNA molecule that is amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and
can be detected by sequencing or by fluorescence-based microarray readouts. The technology allows for the quantification of specific protein interactions in complex biological samples and can be used for a variety of applications, including drug discovery,
Given all the talk of $100 genomes and tens of thousands of genomes being sequenced per year on a single instrument, the question arises: how many of these sequencing factories are we going to see? how many genome equivalents do we need capacity for?
Taking the 50,000 genomes a year mark as a starting number, and considering we have 140 million new-borns a year, we would need 2,800 DNBSEQ T20 factories distributed around the world only to keep up with the new-born human population.
If we consider that about 10% of the world population is older than 65 years, that's 788 million people. If we rounded up to 1 billion people needing cancer screening via liquid biopsy, and estimated the sequencing needed to be 1/10th of a human genome equivalent, then
In #NextGenerationSequencing, @CompleteGenomic's new of the <$100/genome with their DNBSEQ T20 available from Q3 2023, and their T7x3 $130/genome pricing, we now have 3 companies that have hit the $200/genome mark with announcements: @ElemBio $ILMN Illumina and Complete Genomics.
Both $ILMN Illumina and @CompleteGenomic's will hit the $200/genome and <$100/genome mark in the second half of 2023, but @ElemBio Element Bio AVITIx3 and Complete Genomics T7x3 pricing models are *now* available at $200/genome and $130/genome respectively.
Also @UltimaGenomics is working on their U100 instrument aiming at $100/genome, and had several announcements of partnerships with library prep providers at #AGBT23.
In #JPM2023, $NAUT Nautilus Bio didn't make their slides available, but they have a slide deck from an investor meeting in December 2022. They intend to launch their Proteome Analysis Platform in Mid-2024.
They see a market opportunity of $25B, where 50% would be BioPharma customers, and 20% Academic and Research.
One of the biggest piece of news is that $NAUT Nautilus Bio recently partnered with Abcam to enhance their affinity reagent development program.
In #JPM2023 news, $SEER also presented. They are another of the Next Generation Proteomics Sequencing players. One of their USPs is that they have an approach capable of finding different protein variants that would be undistinguishable with affinity-based approaches.
This includes slice variants, where the "Peptide Level" identification allows them to detect meaningful differences where other approaches are not able to.
Since their method is based on peptides, they can go into the 1M+ elements per run, where panel-based affinity methods are limited to the thousands or maybe tens of thousands.